Morin, Lori S.

Stratton, Timothy P.

English

University of Montana

University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Syllabi Course Syllabi Fall 9-1-2000 PHAR 514.01: Pharmacy Ethics Timothy P. Stratton The University Of Montana Lori S. Morin University of Montana - Missoula, lori.morin@umontana.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi Let us know how access to this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Stratton, Timothy P. and Morin, Lori S., "PHAR 514.01: Pharmacy Ethics" (2000). Syllabi. 5283. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi/5283 This Syllabus is brought to you for free and open access by the Course Syllabi at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syllabi by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact scholarworks@mso.umt.edu. PHAR 514 - Pharmacy Ethics Fall, 2000 MW 1310-1430 Room: SB 336Instructors: Tim Stratton, Ph.D., R.Ph., ext. 2339, timstrat@selway.umt.edu (Course Coordinator)Lori Morin, R.Ph., MBA, ext. 4080, morin@selwav.umt.eduCourse description: Conducted in seminar format, this course will review ethical principles and schools of thought, and allow students to discuss and debate ethical dilemmas in health care and pharmacy practice.Course objectives: Upon completion of tins course, students will be able to utilize critical thinking skills and apply ethics theoiy and principles to analyze ethical dilemmas in health care and pharmacy practice scenarios. Students will also be able to evaluate their own ethical beliefs, justify their recommended courses of action, and demonstrate tolerance for opinions which differ from their own.Learning approaches: Faculty presentations, written assignments mid classroom discussions/debates will all be utilized-Grade determination: Grades will not be based upon a student’s ethical position on any issue. Rather, grades will be determined by the student’s ability to identify a case’s ethical concerns, address both sides of each issue identified and apply ethical theories and principles to defend their personal position on each issue. Six take-home written case analyses will constitute the written exams for the course. Students will have the opportunity to discuss each case in class before the assignment’s due date. Each student paper will be identified only by a sequential number (1 to n) selected by the student. Students will be responsible for retaining the code key until after an assignment has been graded. On each written assignment, 60% of the grade will be based on the above criteria, and 40% will be based upon the quality of the student’s writing. Each student may drop the lowest score of the first five assignments. All students must complete the final exam case.In addition to written assignments, students will be graded on the quality of their participation in individual mid group discussions/presentations, and by the quality of their participation as audience members during presentations by others.Attendance is expected at every class session; students anticipating having to miss a class session should contact one of the instructors beforehand. Five (5) points will be deducted for each unexcused absence.Late assignments will be subjected to a 10% penalty for each day an assignment is overdue.(continued on other side):Point Distribution:Written case analyses (5 @ 50 points each -  30 points content; 20 points writing and grammar) 250 points Final written case (50 points content; 25 points writing and grammar) 75 pointsParticipation-scenario presentation/discussion facilitation 25 points -scenario discussions 25 points*-lecture topic discussions 25 points* Total points possible 400 points . -*Don’t ignore these points -   _ , 1' A = 90-100% of possible points B *= 80-89% of possible points C = 70-79% of possible points■ ■ ■ .   ■■■- - ■-- - - - '- - - :■--' -PHAR 514 Course Schedule Fall, Y2K09-06 TPS Course IntroductionGeneral discussion of ethics in pharmacy Assignment 1:(a) Locate one article from the professional or lay press which you believe represents an ethical dilemma.(b) Type a half to full-page description from your internship/externship experiences where you or the pharmacists with which you worked faced an ethical dilemma in practice. You do not necessarily need to include how the dilemma was dealt with. Keep your write-up short, but provide enouj^i details that the class can discuss the situation you describe. Please write your name on the back of your write-up.09-11 LJM Values/Morals/Laws and compromises between the threeProfessional Codes of Ethics Professional Sfandards vs. Institutional Ethics09-13 TPS Problem-solving in Ethics cases (using student articles as examples)Assignment 1 due09-18 TPS DefinitionsFoundations of ethical decision making (Aristotle)Exam 1 distributed09-20 TPS Foundations of ethical decision making (Kant)Exam 1 discussion09-25 TPS Foundations of ethical decision making (Mill)Exam 1 write-up due09-27 TPS Levels of moral development (Kohlberg, Gilligan)10-02 TPS Occupations vs. Professions: Which Is Pharmacy?Exam 2 distributed10-04 TPS/LJM Ethics in professional communicationsEthics of professional relationships Exam 2 discussion10-09 LJM Case discussion: “The Romantic Pharmacist”Are You a Moral Wimp?10-11 TPS Ethics related to drug distribution (bias, rationing) Exam 2 write-up due10-16 TPS Distributive Justice (video)10-18 TPS Distributive Justice (discussion)Quality ofLife Drugs Exam 3 distributed/discussed10-23 TPS Professional Ethics vs. Business Ethics Relations with the pharmaceutical industry10-25 TPS Ethics of placebos Exam 3 write-up due10-27 to 10-29 APhA-ASP Region VH MRM (Spokane)10-30 LJM Right to die (video)11-01 LJM Right to die (discussion)End of life ethics11-06 LJM Assisted suicide Medical Power of Attorney11-07 ELECTION DAY HOLIDAY -  NO CLASSES11-08 TPS Right to refuse to fill a prescription Exam 4 distributed/discussed11-13 TPS Burden o f Knowledge (video)11-15 TPS Burden o f Knowledge (discussion)Exam 4 write-up due11-20 LJM Impaired/incompetent colleagues11-22 STUDENT TRAVEL DAY (NO CLASSES)11-27 TPS Student case scenarios: Presentations Exam 5 distributed/discussed11-29 TPS/LJM Student case scenarios: PresentationsExam 5 write-up due12-04 TPS/LJM Student case scenarios: Presentations12-06 TPS/LJM Case discussions: Dr. Herbert Swick, Institute of Medicine andHumanities, moderator12-11 TPS Student case scenarios: PresentationsFinal Exam distributed12-13 TPS Student case scenarios: PresentationsFinal Exam discussion12-IS (Finals week) Final Exam write-up duev

PHAR 514.01: Pharmacy Ethics

https://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6278&amp;context=syllabi

PHAR 514.01: Pharmacy Ethics

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Montana