Universidad de La Laguna. Servicio de Publicaciones
Abstract
L’ermetismo, per quanto criticato da Agostino, giunse agli umanisti avvolto dalla fama di una dottrina pacifica e ricca di conoscenze e saperi. Il complesso di conoscenze che lo caratterizzava investiva moltissimi campi del sapere dell’epoca, come medicina, matematica, astrologia, alchimia e a questa dottrina si guardava come fonte indiscutibile fino a che non interevenne la condanna filologica da parte di Isaac Casaubon. Da quel momento cambiò l’atteggiamento nei confronti di questo complesso sistema dottrinario, che venne sempre più emarginato.Although disregarded by Augustine, hermetism was highly appreciated among the humanists, who deemed it to be a peaceful doctrine that could provide expertise and valuable profound insights. The thoroughness and complexity of the hermetic tradition was fostered by contributions from the most diverse fields of study at the time, such as medicine, mathematics, astrology and alchemy. Hermetism would thus comprise a wide range of materials, knowledge and erudition and, therefore, maintain its unquestionable role as a source of
wisdom and learning. However, Isaac Casaubon’s philological condemnation of the allegedly ancient writings meant a turning point in their reception, and from that moment on, this body of doctrines kept on being challenged never to recover its former prestige and, therefore, barely surviving as a marginal system of knowledge