We review and clarify the sufficient conditions for uniquely defining the
generalized weak value as the weak limit of a conditioned average using the
contextual values formalism introduced in Dressel J, Agarwal S and Jordan A N
2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 240401. We also respond to criticism of our work in
[arXiv:1105.4188v1] concerning a proposed counter-example to the uniqueness of
the definition of the generalized weak value. The counter-example does not
satisfy our prescription in the case of an underspecified measurement context.
We show that when the contextual values formalism is properly applied to this
example, a natural interpretation of the measurement emerges and the unique
definition in the weak limit holds. We also prove a theorem regarding the
uniqueness of the definition under our sufficient conditions for the general
case. Finally, a second proposed counter-example in [arXiv:1105.4188v6] is
shown not to satisfy the sufficiency conditions for the provided theorem.Comment: 17 pages, final published respons
