Journal ArticleDabigatran etexilate is an oral anticoagulant that acts as a direct, competitive thrombin inhibitor. Large randomized clinical trials have shown higher doses of dabigatran (150 mg taken twice daily) to be superior to warfarin in terms of stroke and systemic embolism rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. As a result, in 2010 the US FDA approved the use of dabigatran for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran is especially attractive in the outpatient setting because patients do not require routine monitoring with prothrombin times or international normalized ratios. To date, no effective reversal agent for dabigatran in the event of catastrophic hemorrhage has been identified. The authors report a case of an elderly patient, being treated with dabigatran for atrial fibrillation, who presented with a rapidly expanding intracranial hemorrhage after a ground-level fall. This case highlights an impending neurosurgical quandary of complications secondary to this new anticoagulation agent and suggests potential options for management

Garber, Sarah

Sivakumar, Walavan.

English

The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital Library

J Neurosurg / Volume 116 / May 2012                                                                                                                     J Neurosurg 116:1093–1096, 20121093AtriAl fibrillation has long been shown to increase the risk of stroke and death.5,6 Pharmacological stroke prevention agents for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have evolved in an effort to address various aspects of the coagulation cascade. Specific efforts aimed at altering thrombus formation have included platelet function inhibitors, such as aspirin and clopidogrel, and vitamin K blockade, with warfarin. Treatment with war-farin results in a relative stroke risk reduction of 60%;6 however, this drug’s efficacy has been hindered by the need for frequent monitoring, multiple interactions with food and other medications, and its increased risk of hem-orrhage.1 Newer agents have aimed at more direct coagu-lation factor inhibition. Large, randomized, multicenter noninferiority trials have shown that direct thrombin in-hibitors, such as dabigatran, have lower rates of stroke and systemic embolism than warfarin with decreased rates of major hemorrhage.1,3 In the event of traumatic hemorrhage in patients receiving dabigatran, however, there are currently no effective reversal agents. Familiar-ity with this new anticoagulation agent is critical in the neurosurgical community so that management options, while currently limited, can be implemented in a timely fashion.Case ReportThis 83-year-old man was evaluated in the emer-gency department after a ground-level fall at home. One month earlier, he had been diagnosed with new-onset atrial fibrillation and started on dabigatran 150 mg twice a day by his primary care physician. On initial neurosur-gical evaluation, the patient was found to have a GCS of 15.9 Noncontrast CT revealed a right temporal intraparen-chymal hemorrhage with surrounding cerebral edema, as well as a small right subdural hematoma and a small area of SAH (Fig. 1 left). There was also a small amount of left frontal lobe and left parietal lobe SAH (Fig. 1 right). Ini-tial laboratory values revealed an international normal-ized ratio of 1.4, a prothrombin time of 17.2 seconds (nor-mal range 12–15.5 seconds), and a partial thromboplastin time of 43 seconds (normal range 24–35 seconds). Platelet counts were normal at 271. The thrombin time was also measured and found to exceed 150 seconds (normal range Neurosurgical complications of direct thrombin inhibitors—catastrophic hemorrhage after mild traumatic brain injury in a patient receiving dabigatranCase reportSarah T. Garber, M.D., Walavan SivakuMar, M.D., anD richarD h. SchMiDT, M.D., Ph.D.Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UtahDabigatran etexilate is an oral anticoagulant that acts as a direct, competitive thrombin inhibitor. Large random-ized clinical trials have shown higher doses of dabigatran (150 mg taken twice daily) to be superior to warfarin in terms of stroke and systemic embolism rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. As a result, in 2010 the US FDA approved the use of dabigatran for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran is especially attractive in the outpatient setting because patients do not require routine moni-toring with prothrombin times or international normalized ratios. To date, no effective reversal agent for dabigatran in the event of catastrophic hemorrhage has been identified. The authors report a case of an elderly patient, being treated with dabigatran for atrial fibrillation, who presented with a rapidly expanding intracranial hemorrhage after a ground-level fall. This case highlights an impending neurosurgical quandary of complications secondary to this new anticoagulation agent and suggests potential options for management.(http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.2.JNS112132)key WorDS      •      dabigatran      •      intracerebral hemorrhage      • anticoagulation      •      thrombin      •      traumatic brain injury      • neurosurgical complicationAbbreviations used in this paper: GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage.S. T. Garber, W. Sivakumar, and R. H. Schmidt1094                                                                                                                      J Neurosurg / Volume 116 / May 201214.7–19.5 seconds). The patient was admitted to the neu-rocritical care unit for serial neurological examinations.Approximately 2 hours after admission to the inten-sive care unit, the patient developed dysarthric speech, although he was still able to briskly follow commands. Repeat CT demonstrated significant interval progression of both the right parenchymal and left frontal hemor-rhages (Fig. 2A). Although the neurosurgical team was aware of the limited options available for reversal of dab-igatran, a weight-based dose of recombinant factor VII was administered because it has a rapid onset of action. The patient’s mental status continued to decline, however, and he required emergency endotracheal intubation for a GCS score of 6 (E1, V1, M4).9 A final CT scan, ob-tained only 6 hours after his initial presentation, showed extensive progression of the patient’s bilateral intrapa-renchymal hemorrhages, now encompassing most of the left hemisphere with 7 mm of left-to-right midline shift and effacement of the left lateral ventricle (Fig. 2B). After extensive discussion with the patient’s family regarding his poor neurological prognosis, the decision was made to transition the patient to comfort care. The patient died shortly thereafter.DiscussionThe recent approval of dabigatran by the US FDA for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation presents a new dilemma for neu-rosurgeons. Patients treated with dabigatran are often el-derly individuals with multiple comorbidities. Imbalance and falls are common in this population, and intracranial hemorrhage resulting even from minor trauma may occur with increasing frequency as use of this drug becomes more widespread.Atrial fibrillation is characterized by a loss of or-ganized atrial contraction, which can lead to stasis and thrombus formation. In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, the annual risk of stroke can be calculated ac-cording to the CHADS2 criteria.7 Because thrombin plays a key role in fibrin clot formation and is essential to blood coagulation, it is an attractive target for pharmaceutical agents. Current anticoagulants such as unfractionated low-molecular-weight heparin and the vitamin K antago-nist warfarin require frequent blood draws and dosing ad-justments to ensure patients remain in a therapeutic range.Dabigatran is a synthetic thrombin inhibitor that binds directly to clot-bound and free thrombin with high specificity.8 Pharmacokinetic highlights include 80% re-nal excretion and a serum half-life of 12–17 hours. Be-cause of its half-life, which is shorter than that of war-farin, dabigatran is typically administered twice daily. It is not metabolized by cytochrome p450 isoenzymes and therefore is less likely to potentiate drug-drug interac-tions.8 In addition, because dabigatran has been shown to have little interaction with food or drugs, it can be pre-scribed in a fixed dose without the constraints of frequent monitoring.8 The most common side effect of dabigatran is dyspepsia, although clinical trial results indicate a pos-sible increased risk of myocardial infarction in patients taking this drug.1 The mechanism behind this cardiac dysfunction is currently unknown.Analysis by the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy) trial investigators3 showed that lower doses of dabigatran (110 mg twice daily) had a lower rate of intracranial hemorrhage when compared with warfarin, while a higher dose (150 mg twice daily) had a similar rate. Additionally, the higher-dose dabigatran was superior to warfarin in the annual rate of stroke and systemic embolism. Postulated to by-Fig. 1. Noncontrast head CT scans obtained in the emergency department showing right temporal intraparenchymal hemor-rhage with associated subdural hemorrhage and SAH (left) and left frontal subarachnoid blood (right).J Neurosurg / Volume 116 / May 2012Neurosurgical complications of direct thrombin inhibitors1095pass the activated factor VII–tissue factor binding that is integral to initiating coagulation, dabigatran preserves hemostatic protection mechanisms that the brain employs to limit spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage.3 In addi-tion to its use in stroke and systemic embolism preven-tion in patients with atrial fibrillation, dabigatran is also currently approved in both Europe and Canada for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.8There is currently no effective antidote to reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in the event of an emer-gency. As a direct thrombin (factor II) inhibitor, dabiga-tran exerts its mechanism of action at the very end of the coagulation cascade, and therefore both factor VIIa and fresh-frozen plasma are ineffective as treatment options. One recent randomized clinical trial showed no effect of prothrombin complex concentrate on the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran.2 Although recent preclinical trials using murine models have shown that high-dose pro-thrombin complex concentrate slows the expansion of intracerebral hematoma, direct clinical applicability is limited by a lack of neurological outcome monitoring and appropriate safety and efficacy studies.10 Additionally, prothrombin complex concentrate is not currently avail-able at our institution and so was not used in this case. Because dabigatran is primarily renally excreted, dialysis is an alternative for drug clearance and can remove ap-proximately 35%–60% of the drug in 2–3 hours.4 Dialy-sis was not considered at the time of initial presentation of our patient, and by the time of his deterioration it was too late to implement effectively.While dabigatran can alter the activated prothrombin time, this has not been shown to be an effective measure of systemic anticoagulation. The thrombin time is the most sensitive laboratory test to assess the effects of dabi-gatran in urgent clinical situations. In addition, the throm-bin time is a rapidly obtained laboratory value that should be readily available in the inpatient and emergency de-partment setting. Our patient presented with a markedly elevated thrombin time, which could have been serially monitored to assess his response to dabigatran had his clinical course been prolonged.As stated, recombinant factor VII administration failed to slow the progression of our patient’s intracra-nial hemorrhage. Dabigatran is different from warfarin, whose inhibitory effect on clotting factors II, VII, IX, and X can be reversed by fresh-frozen plasma, vitamin K, and factor VII. In the absence of an effective antidote, treating physicians should consider obtaining a thrombin time and instituting early use of dialysis in conjunction with judi-cious use of intravenous fluid administration to maintain renal perfusion. Caution is necessary, however, because patients with atrial fibrillation have tenuous intravascular volume status, and fluid overload can lead to worsening heart function. Dabigatran is only the first of several di-rect thrombin inhibitors that may enter clinical use (Table 1), and these agents will likely have similar risks for cata-strophic progression of traumatic injuries.ConclusionsNew direct coagulation factor inhibitors, such as dab-igatran, have demonstrated superior stroke and systemic embolism prevention without the burdensome monitor-ing and drug-drug interactions seen with agents such as warfarin. Although dabigatran has been shown to have a lower incidence of major bleeding than warfarin, in the event of catastrophic hemorrhage no effective rever-sal agent exists. Neurosurgeons are likely to encounter this clinical scenario more frequently with the increased use of dabigatran and other similar drugs. Preclinical and early clinical trials have thus far failed to yield an effective reversal agent for these medications, and new treatments are certainly needed. The authors stress that a high index of suspicion for catastrophic hemorrhage is Fig. 2. Noncontrast head CT scans. A: Study obtained approximately 2.5 hours postadmission showing significant interval evolution of the patient’s intracranial hemorrhage bilaterally. B: Study obtained 6 hours postadmission revealing significant further progression of the patient’s intracranial hemorrhage.S. T. Garber, W. Sivakumar, and R. H. Schmidt1096                                                                                                                      J Neurosurg / Volume 116 / May 2012required in patients taking dabigatran so that the limited management options can be evaluated and implemented without potentially life-threatening delay.DisclosureThe authors report no conflict of interest concerning the mate-rials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.Author contributions to the study and manuscript preparation include the following. Conception and design: all authors. Acquisi-tion of data: Garber, Sivakumar. Analysis and interpretation of data: Garber, Sivakumar. Drafting the article: Garber, Sivakumar. Criti-cally revising the article: all authors. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: all authors. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Schmidt.AcknowledgmentThe authors thank Kristin Kraus, M.Sc., for her masterful help in preparing this paper.References 1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al: Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361:1139–1151, 2009 2. Eerenberg ES, Kamphuisen PW, Sijpkens MK, Meijers JC, Buller HR, Levi M: Reversal of rivaroxaban and dabigatran by prothrombin complex concentrate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. Circulation 124:1573–1579, 2011 3. Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz M, Healey JS, Oldgren J, et al: Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger pa-tients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation 123:2363–2372, 2011 4. Ganetsky M, Babu KM, Salhanick SD, Brown RS, Boyer EW: Dabigatran: review of pharmacology and management of bleeding complications of this novel oral anticoagulant. J Med Toxicol 7:281–287, 2011 5. Hart RG, Benavente O, McBride R, Pearce LA: Antithrombot-ic therapy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 131:492–501, 1999 6. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI: Meta-analysis: antithrom-botic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonval-vular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 146:857–867, 2007 7. Medi C, Hankey GJ, Freedman SB: Stroke risk and antithrom-botic strategies in atrial fibrillation. Stroke 41:2705–2713, 2010 8. Stangier J, Stähle H, Rathgen K, Fuhr R: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran in healthy elderly subjects. Clin Pharmacokinet 47:47–59, 2008 9. Teasdale G, Jennett B: Assessment of coma and impaired con-sciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84, 197410. Zhou W, Schwarting S, Illanes S, Liesz A, Middelhoff M, Zorn M, et al: Hemostatic therapy in experimental intracere-bral hemorrhage associated with the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Stroke 42:3594–3599, 2011Manuscript submitted November 23, 2011.Accepted February 6, 2012.Please include this information when citing this paper: published online March 6, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.2.JNS112132.Address correspondence to: Richard H. Schmidt, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, 175 North Medi-cal Drive East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132. email: neuropub@hsc.utah.edu.TABLE 1: List of direct thrombin inhibitors*Drug Name Brand Name FDA Regulatory Statusdabigatran  etexilatePradaxa approved for prevention of stroke & blood  clots in patients w/ nonvalvular atrial   fibrillation (2010)Argatroban Argatroban approved for prophylaxis or treatment of   thrombosis in patients w/ HIT (2000) &  for use during PCI in patients w/ or at   risk for HIT (2002) lepirudin Refludan approved for the treatment of HIT Type II   (1998)bivalirudin Angiomax approved for use w/ aspirin & provisional  glycoprotein inhibitors as anticoagula-  tion therapy for patients undergoing a   PCI (2005)desirudin Iprivask approved for the prevention of DVT in pa-  tients undergoing elective hip replace-   ment (2003); tested in randomized trial  in patients w/ HIT AZD0837 tested in a randomized Phase II study for   patients w/ atrial fibrillation; compared  w/ vitamin K antagonists in nonran-   domized Phase II study in patients w/   nonvalvular atrial fibrillationM118 tested in Phase II study for use as antico-  agulant in patients w/ stable coronary  artery disease undergoing a PCI*  DVT = deep venous thrombosis; HIT = heparin-induced thrombocyto-penia; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.

Neurosurgical complications of direct thrombin inhibitors - catastrophic hemorrhage after mild traumatic brain injury in a patient receiving dabigatran

https://collections.lib.utah.edu/dl_files/ad/91/ad9173e2cf52ecb0e6e769fcb648ee505c5a5bbf.pdf

Neurosurgical complications of direct thrombin inhibitors - catastrophic hemorrhage after mild traumatic brain injury in a patient receiving dabigatran

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital Library