Journal ArticleOUR TOPIC POSES two key questions. First, what are the pitfalls of writing from within our own religious tradition? Second, what are the advantages? In thinking about the Jewish tradition, my mind conjures up and fixes upon a quotation from Sheriff Wyatt Earp, upholder of law and order in Dodge City, Kansas, and later in Tombstone, Arizona: "The law," he said, "is a funny thing." Similarly,  being Jewish and writing from within a Jewish tradition is a funny thing. Jews have no hierarchical structure. We don't really belong to an organized religion. Individual congregations affiliate with different movements-the Reform movement, the Conservative movement, the Orthodox movement, and the Reconstructionists. Ties are  loose, nonbinding. Each congregation is a body, a community unto itself. The rabbi's authority in each congregation is simply the power to persuade. When our rabbi in Salt Lake City was asked by a member  of the First Presidency: "How far does your authority extend?" the rabbi responded, "Never beyond the kitchen of my own home-and usually not even there

Goldberg, Robert A.

English

Journal ArticleOUR TOPIC POSES two key questions. First, what are the pitfalls of writing from within our own religious tradition? Second, what are the advantages? In thinking about the Jewish tradition, my mind conjures up and fixes upon a quotation from Sheriff Wyatt Earp, upholder of law and order in Dodge City, Kansas, and later in Tombstone, Arizona: "The law," he said, "is a funny thing." Similarly,  being Jewish and writing from within a Jewish tradition is a funny thing. Jews have no hierarchical structure. We don\u27t really belong to an organized religion. Individual congregations affiliate with different movements-the Reform movement, the Conservative movement, the Orthodox movement, and the Reconstructionists. Ties are  loose, nonbinding. Each congregation is a body, a community unto itself. The rabbi\u27s authority in each congregation is simply the power to persuade. When our rabbi in Salt Lake City was asked by a member  of the First Presidency: "How far does your authority extend?" the rabbi responded, "Never beyond the kitchen of my own home-and usually not even there

The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital Library

AJewish Perspective Robert A. Goldberg O UR TOPIC 1'05ES two key questions. First, what are the pitfalls of writing from within our own religious t raditio n? Second, what are the advanlages? In thinking about the J ewish traditio n, my mind conjures up and fixes upon a quotation from Sheriff Wyatt Earp, upholder of law and order in Dodge City, Kansas, and later in Tombstone, Arizona: "The law," he said, "is a funny thing." Simi· larly, being Jewish and writing from within a Jewish tradition is a funny thing. J ews have no hierarchical su'ucture. We don't really belong lO an organized religion. Individual congregations affiliate with differ-ent movements-the Reform movement, the Conservative move-ment, the Orthodox movemCIll. and the Reconstructionists. Ties are loose, nonbinding. Each congregation is a body, a community unto ilSelf. The rdbbi's authority in each congregation is simply the power to persuade. When our rabbi in Salt Lake City was asked by a mem~ ber of the First Presidency: "How far does your authority extend?" the rabbi responded, "Never beyond the kitchen of my own home-and usually not even there." Other than monotheism, there is no binding doctrine, no bind-ing catechism that unites Jews. The individual is in communion with Cod as he or she perceives Him or Her. 111ere have been no excom-munications of dissenters, of agnostics, or of atheists for at least three or four centuries. Moreover, there is a spectrum of answers 1O the question: Who is aJew? A fie rce debate rages, not only in Israel • 122 The Journal of Mormon History but in this country. It concerns such matters as the mother's religion, ritual observance, and the conversion practice-all of which suggest slightly different answers to that complex question. And that complex question leads us to a larger, more profound issue. For many Jews, both in Israel and here,Judaism is more than a religion. It is an ethnicity, a cultural, historical, and ethical identity. Judaism, then, is more than the synagogue. It is a commitment to ethical beliefs and codes, a responsibility (tikkun olam) to repair the world, to pursue goodly behavior, to leave the world a better place, to help the weak, to support the poor. Such behaviors are performed not from a desire for heavenly reward or because of fear of punish-ment. Such, in my mind, is Judaism-a call beyond the self, a call to activism-not only to Jews but to all of mankind and womankind. In that context, 1 would like to focus on two questions: How has my Jewish identify affected my sense of history? And how have my experiences and my research, in turn, echoed and fed back to shape my identity? To answer those questions, I ask that you go with me on a historical quest that is intensely personal. It is important and valuable because it reveals the interplay of the historian, the religious tradition, and the pursuit of history. About half a century ago, I was born in New York City which has a critical mass of Jews. That means it is easy to be Jewish there. Public schools close for Jewish religious holidays. Organizations exist to foster the full range of Jewish belief and Jewish ideas. There are multiple synagogues, many cultural events, and, of course, a great many places to obtain Jewish food. You don't have to worry about being Jewish in New York. That perhaps explains the minimum of Jewish education I received as a child. I learned the bare essentials for bar mitzvah, the coming-of-age ceremony by which Jewish boys and girls at age thirteen assume the responsibilities of adulthood. The idea was that being and stayingJewish would take care of itself. But then the unexpected happened. When I was fifteen, my family moved to Scottsdale, Arizona, a suburb of Phoenix. It was the mid-1960s, and there was only one synagogue in the entire Phoenix area. I was the only Jew in my high school. Some hotels and restau-rants did not serve J ews. Jews were not allowed to purchase homes in certain areas. The Phoenix Country Club had just ended its ban on Jewish members, but the famous Camelback Inn and other re-sorts were still closed to Jews. At Arizona State University, I found little relief; there were few Jews and no Jewish student organization. ) DEAN L MAy AND R OBERT A. G O LDBERG(fRADITION 123 What was once familiar , taken for granted, was now gone; and care packages from the East were poor means to foster a sense of J ewish-ness. This isolation and discrimination forced me to understand my-self as aJew. It led me to nurture and culti'~<lte my Jewish identity. I did it first as a hobby, then as a cOllege m~or, and !.hen as a profes-sion. I accomplished this by studying American history. Under-standing history became my means to rootedness and community. The subjects I research and write about are intensely personal and related to my life. In exploring these topics, I know myself as a person and as a Jew. An overview of tJle topics I have researched and published on will show what I mean by the interaction of identity, history, and the Jewish tradition. My first subject was the Ku Klux Klan . Most people, when they hear tJlese words, cOl~ure up an image of SoutJlem red-necks bent upon intimidating and harassing blacks. The 1960s were a formative period of time lo r me, and the Klan rode in ule 1960s. This became a very personal experience because my fourth-grade teacher, Mrs. Schwerner, was !lIe mouler of one of the tluee civil rights wo rkers killed in Mississippi in June 1964. The civil rights movement was salient, as was the Ku Klux Klan . I participated in civil rights demonstrations in New York City protesting discri mina-tion. I was thus drawn to study !.he Klan. However. I chose to re-search, not the Klan o f the I 960s bUlthe Klan of the 1920s, first as an hono rs project at Arizona State University and later fo r my dis-sertation at the University o f Wisconsin. I was interested in !.he Klan of the 1920s because it was the most powerful social movement of !.he li ght wing in our history. It was a national movement. which had its strongest branches, or klavel1ls, in Indianapolis, Chicago, Denver , and Los Angeles. And, perhaps, most important, the Klan move-mem during th is period was primarily anti-Catholic and anti:J ewish, not anti-black. It is estimated that perhaps 6 million men and women joined the Ku Klux Klan during the 1920s. For my dissert.'l.tion, which became my first book, I I studied Colorado, where the Klan elected mayors throughout the state. a governor, the lower house of the Slate legislature. and both U.s. Senalors. I found membership lists with 20,000 names for Denver IRoben A. Goldberg, fiO(}{/ed Empire: The Ku Klux Klan in Colorado (Urbana: University of Ittino is Press, 198 1). 124 The Journal of Mormon History and the small towns of Colorado and did a statistical analysis. I wanted to know who these people were, their occupations, where they lived, their marital status, the size of their families. What I found was that these Kluxers, these Klansmen and Klanswomen, were not the fringe, not the poor, not the alienated, but middle-class men and women, thirty years and older, married with children in stable homes. My interest was not simply academic. I learned a lot of things personally, knowledge that fortified my identity as a Jew. The first thing I did with my 20,000 names was hit the telephone books. I wanted to know if any of these people were still alive; I wanted to interview them. I wrote letters. Foolishly, I used my real name, Gold-berg, aJewish signal; but I thought this was an old movement. Anti-Semitism was surely dying in this country. This was the end of the twentieth century. From the first thirty letters, I received not one response. I then switched tactics. I made my middle name my first name and my first name my last so I magically became Alan Roberts. I sent out thirty more letters, and guess what? The Klan boys wanted to talk. I now came face to face with what I would call the beast. What these Klux-ers told me was painful and upsetting, but it was also strengthening. As one Kluxer said to me: "You can tell aJew just by looking at 'im." I inquired with unfeigned interest: "How can you do that? What are their characteristics?" He said, "Well, you know, they wave their hands around a lot. Their eyes are shifty. Surely you have Jewish friends." Another Klanner told me, "You can smell aJew, because Jews have Jew-stuff that oozes out of their pores." In 1980 I was offered a position at the University of Utah and came to Utah for the first time. I must tell you that my initial look at Utah stunned me. It looked like Scandinavia. Everybody was blond. It seemed as if I had zoomed back in time to the 1950s. There were glass milk bottles. All the women appeared to be pregnant. Dorothy, this sure wasn't New York. I felt absolutely out of place, worse than Arizona. My response was to start reading, first about the Mormon people, and then about the Jews in Utah. I located a book or two,2 not very good. However, I was particularly struck by ------- ---------------------~uanita Brooks, History of the.Jews of Utah and Idaho (Salt Lake City: Western Epics, 1973), and Leon Watters, The Pioneer.Jews of Utah, Vol. 2 in DEAN L. MAy AND ROBERT A. G OLDBERG(fRADrIlON 125 a little curiosity I found in a book on ghost towns in Utah. It seems thallhere had once been aJewish settlemem in Sanpete Coun ty. A phoLOgraph showed a b'laVeSLOne inscribed in Hebrew in the middle of the Utah desert. My interest was aroused . I did some research and found one anicle . ~ In 19 11 , two hundredJ cwish families in Philadelphia and New York subsnibed mo ney to buy land in Utah to fosler a back-to-the-soil movement. They named their settJement Clarion because it was to be a cl<uion call to theJews in New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Chicago to leave the cities and restructure Jewish life. I looked at tJ'e land records and found names. I putadvertisemenL" in Yiddish ncwspapers and the New York Review of Books. I also looked through the telephone directo]-ies for the mo re unusual names-not like Goldberg and Goldste in but Binder, Oklm, and Nilva. I was able to track down fifty-three of the families who scttled in Clarion in 19 11 . 1l,ese fifty-three produced ninejournals, ranging in size from fi fteen to two hundred pages, and one slllvivor. Vi'hat I uncovered in Clarion, Utah, was a moment of J ewish time informed by a mass of materials. I imerviewed the sons and the daughters, who had maimained networks with one another. These people went on pilgrimages to Sanpete County to touch this moment in Jewish time. "n,ey had preserved the letters and notes. BeingJewish allowed me entrance. Being Jewish enabled me LO understand the nuances of their lives. I was always struck by the fact that. when I interviewed these people, they brought in thei,' children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren t.o listen. It was clear tJ,at they wanted tJ,eir own fam ilies to hear this story-that it was a story wortJl hearing and teaching, again and again. I also interviewed Mormon fanners in Sanpete County, and I was impressed . They remembered the colony. Several had painstak-ingly collected informatio n about the colony. Generously they gave it to me. "Take it with you ," they said. "Write a book about it. This is important. " Still, I was jarred when I heard Sanpete Coumy people use the word Jew as an adjective. "Those are the J ew farms, and those Studies in Amcrican Jewisb History (New York: American Jewish Historical Society, 1952). 3Everett Cooley. MClarion, Utah: J ewish Colony in Zion," Utah Historical Quarterly 30 (Spring 1968): 11 3-3 1. 126 The Journal of Mormon History are Jew fences, and those are Jew gravestones." It conjured up images of Nazi Germany for me all over again. Clarion, Utah, was one of about twenty Jewish agricultural colo-nies planted in the United States as part of this back-to-the-soil move-ment. Others were created in Canada, Argentina, and of course, Israel. In fact, in 1909, Degania was Israel's first kibbutz, preceding by just two years the Jewish settlement in Clarion. The Jews in Clar-ion stayed on the land for five years, struggled against poor soil, no water, and weather disasters. While the colony officially died in 1916, some Jewish farmers stayed on for an additional fifteen years in Sanpete County because they believed they were changing the lives of a larger population ofJews. That they failed is their history. That they struggled, that they were greater than themselves, that they fought for the Jewish people is the legacy they leave to my commu-nity. I have great pride in knowing that their story is now incorpo-rated in junior high school textbooks of Utah history. Again, in my research, I was changed. I learned about Russian discrimination against Jews. I learned about Jewish left-wing move-ments and the migration to America. This was self-education and self-study. I take pride in the fact that I added a piece of the Jewish mOSaIc. '." My third book related to my activism in the civil rights move-ment in the 1960s and in Students for a Democratic Society.4 This study obviously continued my absorption in social movements-col-lective action by men and women to change America. Again I was intrigued by the Jewish angle to American activism. Jews participate disproportionately in social movements. It is estimated that Jews formed half of the American Communist Party membership in the 1930s and 1940s. The Free Speech movement at Berkeley, Students for a Democratic Society, and the National Organization for Women were disproportionately Jewish. In this book I write of a Jewish socialization process, family conditioning that fosters a toleration of radicalism, a questioning of authority, an assertiveness in defense of rights. Even more person-ally, in my study of the Communist Party of New York in the 1930s and' 40s, I came across the Furriers Union, which was heavily domi-nated by Communists. When my father came back from World War 4Robert A. Goldberg, Grassroots Resi5tance: Social Movements zn Twentieth-Century America (Chicago: Waveland Press, 1996). D EAN 1. MAy AND ROBERT A . GOLDBERG(fRAOITION 127 II , he had brieny belonged to ulis union. I immediately gOl on the phone: "Hey, Dad, did you ever hear of Max Green?" "Sure, I knew Max Green . He was in Ule Furriers Union." "Did you ever hear of Abe Si l ver?~ " I knew Abe-wait a min ute," he said. "Who ha,'e you been talking to? Where'd you get those names?" My fa ther men told me ~something he 'd never told me before. As a child in the 1930s, he had belonged to the Young Pioneers, a Communist youth group. Th is exchange informed a statement he had made constantly to me during the 1960s: "Whatever you do, whatever protests you are in, whatever organization you join, don't sign anything." My most recen t book is a biography of Barry Goldwater, a U.S. Senator from Arizona for thirty years and a presidential candidate in 1964.5 Goldwater is credited with birthing the modern American consenra tive movement. As a youth , I was absolutely intrigued by Ban)' Goldwater . The first political book I read- at age eleven in 1960-was The Conscience oJa Conseroative (Shepherdsville, Ky.: Vic-tor Publishing Co., 1960). At thirteen , I read Goldwater's other book, Why Not Victory?(New York, McGraw-Hili, 1962). I knew Barry had the answers. In high school in New York, my brother and I were Goldwater's only supporters. In 1964, I took my mother to the voting b0001, closed Ule curtain , and tumed the lever for Goldwater. Ban)' and I have since spli t company poljtically. The Vietnam War drove me to the left and him furUlCr to the right, but mat's another story. I was eager to do a biography on Barry Goldwater, to revisit me site of my adolescent rebellion and to study me J ew who got closest to the office of the American presidency. Two jokes made the rounds in meJewish community during the 1964 campaign, bOlh in reference to Bar ry Goldwater's J ewish father and Christian mother. One went, "Well, we all knew mat the tirstJ ewish president would be an Episcopalian. " And the second one, Ban)' Goldwater told. While preparing to tee up one day at a club that d idn 't admit Jews as members, the club president came running up and said , "Bany, you 're half Jewish . You can' t play golf here." To which Barry said, "Well, since I'm o nly half Jewish, le t me play the fi rst n ine holes." . 5Robcn A. Goldberg, Barry GoldWlller (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1995). 128 The Journal oj Mormon History In the book, I explore Barry Goldwater's Jewish roots. I trace the story of his grandfather, Michael Goldwasser, from the shtetl in Poland to the Arizona outback and eventually to his home in San Francisco. Here was a man who held to his faith, attending services weekly on the Sabbath, sending his children to Hebrew school, being part of aJewish merchant network out of California that reached to Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and Idaho. He was a Zionist, a believer in a Jewish state in Israel. His son Baron was bar mitzvahed but became alienated, became assimilated, did not participate inJewish organizational activities, and married outside the faith. Barry Gold-water's first memories are of Christmas, sitting in the lap of Santa, who interestingly enough was played by Aaron Goldberg, another Jew who lost his way. Barry's father never mentioned his Judaism, and Barry mused to me during one interview, "Here I am, a half:Jew, and I don't know a goddamn thing about it." But Barry Goldwater's Judaism was not so easy to escape. At Virginia's Stanton Military Academy where he went to high school, he faced anti-Semitism. According to his yearbook, his nickname was "Goldberg," which surprised me. I interviewed his roommate who told me: "It was better than calling him 'Kike.'" Barry Goldwater told me, "I had to go back east to learn that Jews were somehow different." Rather than sensitizing Barry Goldwater and giving him greater awareness, he accepted the anti-Semitism in silence. He made no protest, and he ran from his identity. When he pledged Sigma Chi at the University of Arizona, he did not object when his closest friend, Harry Rosensweig, a Jew, was denied admission be-cause Sigma Chi had a "no Jews" policy. As president of his country club, he maintained a strict exclusionist policy; and when the Jews of Phoenix were seeking to open restricted clubs, Barry Goldwater would not assist them. In fact, he held his press conference conced-ing defeat to Lyndon Johnson after the 1964 election at the most notorious restricted club, the Camelback Inn. Barry Goldwater never came to terms with his heritage. He never accepted it and never understood it. He always had a sense of ambivalence because hisJewishness made him feel different. It made him uncomfortable. He had a recognition, which I feel that all Jews in this country know, feel, and fear-that in this golden land of freedom and opportunity, we are not at home. As a minority, we face hostility. Jews feel a need-as I would argue every minority does-to accommodate, to DEAN L. MAy AND ROBERT A. G OLDBERG(fRAornoN 129 adjust, and to assimilate. This makes us more Jewish at home and in our community than we are outside. In conclusion, I hope that this roundabout excursion has shed light on the questions of histOl), thinking and hisIOl) '-wriling, and their interconnections with ethnic and religious identities. Who I am shapes what I study, the questions I ask, and my in terpretation. Still, my in terp retations are bound by my personal and professional in-tegrity. I have been privileged. , have ne"er been restricted nor intimidated by community authority o r censors. My hope is that my work is free from denial, excuse, or mindless glorificatio n. Ifnot, my exploration o f the past would short-circuit my larger goals. To ex-plore the past is to understand my self, my community, and my people. 

Jewish perspective

https://collections.lib.utah.edu/dl_files/30/bc/30bc008bb0b86a69a1fc62f3eb0e6ae912faa39d.pdf

Jewish perspective

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital Library