Leeds was designated a core city for trialling the Government’s Green Deal domestic energy efficiency policy. Leeds Beckett University undertook a monitoring and testing program on 65 dwellings to investigate the effectiveness of the insulation measures installed and to understand any underperformance. This report outlines the findings from a series of investigations including; surveys, air tightness tests, co heating tests, in situ U-value tests, hygrothermal and thermal bridging modelling, in use monitoring and occupant interviews. The surveys revealed that the ‘whole house approach’ to retrofit was, more often, missing, and quality assurance around insulation detailing was regularly absent, leading to avoidable errors and potentially embedding problems in the installations. Furthermore, moisture issues were, in the majority of instances, over-looked or made worse despite over half the sample having some form of damp. Despite this, energy savings were observed and the appearance of the dwellings were improved, thus apparent satisfaction was generally high, even though the installs were imperfect and moisture problems were introduced. Hygrothermal modelling of IWI cases suggests that thermal bridging at party walls can increase by more than 60% and that there could be potential for rot to embedded timbers. Insulation was recorded to reduce background ventilation of the dwellings by around 25% (a factor unaccounted for in government energy models), although some dwellings were still left with air tightness levels worse than modern day UK Building Regulations limits and replacing wet plaster with IWI was seen to undermine the performance of the insulation. The heat loss coefficient of three homes were tested and showed improvements of 25% and 56% for full retrofits with IWI, and 8% for a party wall retrofit; ¾ of these savings were achieved by fabric improvements and the final quarter from incidentally making dwellings more air tight. The before and after in use monitoring suggested the average savings in energy consumption from all retrofit types (EWI, IWI or other) were between 20% and 29%, although small sampling periods limits the certainty of the results. More reliably it was observed that comfort conditions improved; before the retrofit, 14 of the homes were experiencing discomfort from cold; the retrofit brought on average 2 /3 of uncomfortable homes into more reasonable comfort bands. Nearly all of the occupants had positive experiences, although no householders had to pay for the retrofit, reporting being warmer, bringing unused rooms back into operation and feeling more pride in their homes and communities. A variety of perceptions and behaviours were observed around set point temperatures, use of heating controls and motivations for using energy, all of which contribute to make a complex policy landscape. There is huge potential for domestic retrofit and although this research suggests the curren
