We investigate the effects of potential sources of systematic error on the
angular and photometric redshift, z_phot, distributions of a sample of redshift
0.4 < z < 0.7 massive galaxies whose selection matches that of the Baryon
Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) constant mass sample. Utilizing over
112,778 BOSS spectra as a training sample, we produce a photometric redshift
catalog for the galaxies in the SDSS DR8 imaging area that, after masking,
covers nearly one quarter of the sky (9,913 square degrees). We investigate
fluctuations in the number density of objects in this sample as a function of
Galactic extinction, seeing, stellar density, sky background, airmass,
photometric offset, and North/South Galactic hemisphere. We find that the
presence of stars of comparable magnitudes to our galaxies (which are not
traditionally masked) effectively remove area. Failing to correct for such
stars can produce systematic errors on the measured angular auto-correlation
function, w, that are larger than its statistical uncertainty. We describe how
one can effectively mask for the presence of the stars, without removing any
galaxies from the sample, and minimize the systematic error. Additionally, we
apply two separate methods that can be used to correct the systematic errors
imparted by any parameter that can be turned into a map on the sky. We find
that failing to properly account for varying sky background introduces a
systematic error on w. We measure w, in four z_phot slices of width 0.05
between 0.45 < z_phot < 0.65 and find that the measurements, after correcting
for the systematic effects of stars and sky background, are generally
consistent with a generic LambdaCDM model, at scales up to 60 degrees. At
scales greater than 3 degrees and z_phot > 0.5, the magnitude of the
corrections we apply are greater than the statistical uncertainty in w.Comment: Accepted by MNRA