To what extent are citizens able to control their elected officials? Does representation
improve when issues become visible? Conflicting results in studies of legislative
representation are frequently attributed to issue salience or subconstituency politics.
However, most conclusions about the effect of issue salience rely on studies of responsiveness on issues held to be either important or visible. Consequently, we have little idea of how changes in salience serve to alter the representational relationship. To
examine this question, we employ a natural experiment to exploit the sudden increase
in issue visibility surrounding the consideration of the Armenian Genocide Resolution.
We are unable to detect any evidence that salience (as measured by visibility) enhances responsiveness to majority preferences. Instead, salience appears to alter legislators’ sensitivity to different intense subconstituency groups in their districts