In a globalising market, labour migration in low-skilled sectors plays an important role. A growing number of poor people move between their villages of origin, capital cities, and international destinations, while financially sustaining their families and home countries. The positive role of remittances for alleviating the poverty of sending countries is widely acknowledged. However, migration also leads to a growing imbalance between rural and urban areas and certain unfavourable societal changes. Drawing on case studies in Central and South Asia, this issue of evidence for policy examines the challenges of making migration safer and more beneficial for low-skilled workers

Ghimire, Anita

Gurung, Ganesh

Thieme, Susan

In a globalising market, labour migration in low-skilled sectors plays an 

important role. A growing number of poor people move between their 

villages of origin, capital cities, and international destinations, while 

financially sustaining their families and home countries. The positive role 

of remittances for alleviating the poverty of sending countries is widely 

acknowledged. However, migration also leads to a growing imbalance 

between rural and urban areas and certain unfavourable societal changes. 

Drawing on case studies in Central and South Asia, this issue of 

evidence for policy examines the challenges of making migration safer and more beneficial for low-skilled workers

Bern Open Repository and Information System (BORIS)

Making migration safer Policy messagen   Labour migrants in the low-skilled sector have a strong potential to be development agents in poverty alleviation.n   Considering migration in development means taking into account the different stages of migration, from departure to return. For example, information and vocational training benefit migrants before they leave the country.n   Circular migration should be facilitated by governments with measures such as flexible residency, citizenship rights, and portable benefits.n   The migrants’ social and economic security and the impact on families left behind should be considered. Circular migrationWorldwide, more than 214 million people live outside their countries of origin. About half of these are labour migrants, making significant contribu-tions to the economies of both receiv-ing (host) and sending (home) coun-tries. This has resulted in a widespread recognition of the advantages of mi-gration. Policymakers and develop-ment agencies now consider labour migrants as new development agents. For example, the UN has initiated a High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development (since 2006). Or in the case of Nepal, the government recently drafted a nation-al “Foreign Employment Policy 2011” – this policy is the most relevant na-tional norm governing international labour migration out of Nepal.  Despite increased international and national awareness of migrants and their economic contributions, much remains to be done in terms of clarify-ing and improving their legal status. NCCR North-South research on migra-tion in Asian countries has shown that due to their perceived temporary status and high mobility, migrants’ rights as citizens as well as their living Updated edition 2014........................ In a globalising market, labour migration in low-skilled sectors plays an important role. A growing number of poor people move between their villages of origin, capital cities, and international destinations, while  financially sustaining their families and home countries. The positive role  of remittances for alleviating the poverty of sending countries is widely acknowledged. However, migration also leads to a growing imbalance between rural and urban areas and certain unfavourable societal changes. Drawing on case studies in Central and South Asia, this issue of evidence  for policy examines the challenges of making migration safer and more beneficial for low-skilled workers.Kathmandu airport: Nepali workers about to depart for the Gulf region (2012). Outmigration and resulting remittances are a main pillar of Nepal’s economy. Photo: Anita Ghimire Case studies featured here were conducted in: India, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Pakistanand working conditions are still fre-quently neglected by both their host country and their home country. Remittance economies  in AsiaMigration benefits both host and home countries. Host countries bene-fit economically, since migrants con-tribute labour. And home countries benefit economically, since migrants send home remittances. Indeed, re-mittances are the second-most impor-tant source of external funding for South Asian countries such as Bangla-desh, India, Pakistan, and Nepal. In Nepal’s case, remittances from labour migration have been identified as accounting for 22 percent of the country’s GDP (World Bank 2013). Despite a recent protracted civil war in Nepal, the country has managed to achieve several of its MDG goals relat-ed to economic and social aims. Most experts and development practition-ers in Nepal credit remittances for enabling sustained improvements in the lives of many Nepalis, even dur-ing times of severe conflict. In Paki-stan, remittances were a major source of funding in rebuilding the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) after the earthquake in 2005. Examples from Central Asia show that Kyr-gyzstani migrants working in Russia and Kazakhstan send home remittanc-es that contribute as much as 30 per-cent of the country’s GDP in a given year (World Bank 2013). Alleviating povertyThe positive role of remittances and their potential contribution for poverty alleviation has been recognised across South Asia. Bangladesh and Pakistan have set up separate ministries for the welfare of their migrant communities abroad. In rural communities with little cash income, even small transfers of money are highly valued as they re-duce vulnerability to risks such as crop failure, food shortages, or disease. For Nepali migrants and their families, having family members in neighbour-ing India assures access to medical treatment and education. It also means there are fewer family members strain-ing the household budget.Economies that have grown depend-ent on remittances, however, are vul-nerable. Researchers have found that unreliable remittances are a major financial threat to households in rural NWFP, Pakistan. Further, remittances alone cannot replace the overall con-tribution made by family members to their family (e.g., through parental or family care) or made by citizens to their state (e.g., through participation in the political process or social movements).Countries’ shifting  migration roleSouth Asia is not just a region that sends migrants elsewhere. It is also an important receiving and transit region. For example, though known globally as a migrant-sending country, Nepal itself hosts many Bangladeshi An older couple and their grandchild in Kyrgyzstan: those who remain behind are often greatly affected by the insecure position of family members working abroad. Thus, introduc-ing measures that assure safe migration also aids non-migrating family members – frequently elderly people who must care for small children. Photo: Kazu Ahmed (2008)Featured case studiesRadio programme for Nepali migrantsFor many people from Nepal, outmigra-tion has become an increasingly impor-tant livelihood strategy, and outmigra-tion is now a pillar of Nepal’s economy. While the situation for Nepali migrants has improved, research results suggest that migrants from rural areas of Nepal often lack a solid basis for making in-formed choices about working abroad, since public and private services for migrants are concentrated in Kathman-du. Migrants’ main source of information tends to be the brokers at employment agencies (known locally as “manpower agencies”) who help arrange for work placements abroad. But the information that brokers provide is often biased or distorted to benefit the agencies them-selves and does not necessarily help mi-grants make informed choices. A radio project has made it possible to better in-form migrants and potential migrants of the dangers and opportunities they face. The programme was set up as an infor-mation bulletin in partnership with an NGO, researchers, and a group of wom-en migrant returnees. About 200 local “listeners’ clubs” were established to provide radio access, collect feedback, and encourage wider dissemination of information. As no sound migration pol-icy and official information mechanisms exist in Nepal to date, the programme has helped bridge the information gap.Need for infrastructure develop-ment in Kyrgyz migration areasSmall and medium-sized towns are important intermediary points between rural and urban areas in Kyrgyzstan. They provide social and economic services that not only make a return of migrants more likely but also enable non-migrants to obtain access to health care, childcare, and education. Scholars call for policies that support urban–rural integration and provide public invest-ment to encourage the flow of goods and resources across sectors and locations. A more integrated economy offers more choices and allows individu-als and households to pursue their own best paths out of poverty. The rise of a more diversified non-farm economy can thus result in positive transformation. and Indian workers as well as Tibetan and Bhutanese refugees. Due to dif-fering national migration policies in the region, certain countries function as transition hubs and meeting places for professionals of different national-ities. For example, while there are strict policies in place that limit mi-gration between India and Pakistan, both Indians and Pakistanis can easily migrate to Nepal. In this way, Nepal and other countries (e.g., Maldives) have become favourable meeting and transition hubs for migrants from other countries in South Asia. Rural–urban divideThe interdependence between inter-nal and international migration is clearly apparent. While the urban–ru-ral divide is a driving factor of migra-tion, it is also perpetuated as a result of migration. People leave their villag-es in search of opportunities in the cities – in their own country or abroad. A study in Kyrgyzstan has shown that although most migrants wish to return to their home country, their first choice would be the capital, Bishkek, rather than their village of origin. Reasons not to return to rural areas include fewer economic oppor-tunities and a lack of social or medi-cal services.Social changeMigration redefines the division of labour and responsibilities. This af-fects migrants themselves and those who remain behind. In Pakistan, agri-cultural work has become increasing-ly feminised due to male outmigra-tion. In Nepal, migration itself has become feminised, as female outmi-gration is a growing trend. NCCR North-South researchers discovered that those who remain behind not only face a greater workload, they also assume more decision-making responsibility – as found in the case of migrants’ wives left behind in Ne-pal. During the Maoist conflict in Ne-pal, women were also left to negoti-ate with the conflicting parties – a new dynamic in the Nepali context.Social and economic  protectionWhile migrants’ remittances are wel-comed by their home countries, the migrants themselves are rarely con-sidered in policymaking and develop-ment interventions. In the host coun-tries, migrants’ mobility is often restricted, their livelihoods are left vulnerable, and they themselves are harassed by the authorities. Lack of adequate education, lack of know-ledge about the host country, and insecure working and living condi-tions make it hard for migrants to recover the costs associated with migration (e.g., debts, placement fees, travel), hamper their ability to send remittances to relatives back home, and prevent them from saving enough money to invest in the future. Many migrants live from hand to mouth.The female face of migrationNational migration policies are often gendered and limit the international migration of women. Nepal, for exam-ple, has restricted women’s labour migration to specific countries, such as the Gulf States. This was suppos-edly done in the name of “positive discrimination” – in order to protect women from being exploited as do-mestic workers. However, women have continued to migrate from Ne-pal, often using irregular channels that expose them to even greater risk. While a recent policy amendment ended Nepal’s total ban on female labour migration to Gulf countries, women under the age of 32 are still restricted from doing so. In Pakistan, female labour migration was com-pletely banned for many years. Now, for the first time, a new draft policy currently under discussion would enable broad-based female labour migration.DefinitionCircular migrationThe International Organization for Migration (IOM) defines circular migration as the fluid movement, of people between countries, including temporary or long-term movement which may be beneficial to all involved if occurring voluntarily and linked to the labour needs of countries of origin and destination (www.iom.int).Strengthening migrants’ wives in PakistanIn Pakistan, male labour migration often increases the vulnerability of family members who remain behind. In particular, women’s mobility is often restricted in the absence of male companions. Migrants’ wives face greater difficulties in accessing health care facilities because a male chaper-one is typically required for them to venture outside the homestead. Yet, international experience has shown that social networks based on women’s common interest and characterised by more egalitarian relations between the members have the potential to enhance their resilience. Therefore, village organisations, researchers, and NGOs have  entered into a partnership to promote the formation of inter-house-hold, village-level organisations among transnational migrants’ wives in the Upper Dir district in Pakistan. Featured case studies, cont.A Nepali woman doing domestic work in Lebanon (2012). Banning women’s migration has not stopped them from leaving in search of work. It has exposed them to even greater risks of exploitation. Photo: NIDSFurther readingGhimire A and Upreti BR. 2010. The forgot-ten forces: The role of migrants in post-con-flict state building. In: Upreti BR, Sharma SR, Pyakuryal KN, Ghimire S, editors. 2010. The Remake of a State: Post-conflict Challenges and State Building in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: NCCR North-South South Asia Regional Coordination Office and Human and Natural Resources Studies Centre (HNRSC), Kathmandu University.Ghimire A, Upreti BR, Gurung G, Adhikari J, Arnoy J, Thieme S, editors. 2012. Nepal Migration Yearbook 2011. Kathmandu, Nepal: NIDS and NCCR North-South. Siegmann KA. 2010. Strengthening whom? The role of international migration for women and men in Northwest Pakistan. Progress in Development 10(4):345–361. Thieme S. 2012. Coming home? Patterns and characteristics of return migration in Kyr-gyzstan. International Migration. [Early View (online version of record published before inclusion in an issue).  DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00724.x]World Bank. 2013. Migration and Remittances. [http://tinyurl.com/2ughy8; accessed  20 November 2013]......................................................Susan Thieme, PhDSenior Teaching and Research Associate University of Zurich susan.thieme@geo.uzh.chAnita Ghimire, PhDPostdoctoral Fellow NCCR North-Southbhattarainitu@gmail.comThe NCCR North-South is co-financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and the participating institutions. The views expressed in evidence for policy belong to the author(s) concerned and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the funding agencies, the overall NCCR North-South network, or other institutions.Keywords: circular migration, development agents, remittances, low-skilled workers, civil rights, economic security, social protection, India, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Pakistan Policy implications of NCCR North-South research•		Migration	policies	should	separately	address	the	different	stages	of	migration:	life in the home country, pre-departure preparations, and travelling to as well as working and living in the host country. The lives and movements of low-skilled workers (mainly from rural areas) should be systematically addressed when planning, implementing, and evaluating development programmes in home and host countries. There should also be greater cooperation between institutions that are formally in charge of migration issues and others that are not, such as migrants’ associations or local microfinance groups.•		Facilitating	beneficial	circular	migration	requires	elimination	of	disincentives	to	such circulation, primarily by providing flexible residency and citizenship rights. This would not only reduce irregular migration and risks of human trafficking, it would also allow migrants to limit expenses associated with migration, enabling them to save money and acquire the skills needed for a more successful return. •		Efforts	must	be	made	to	improve	migrants’	social	and	economic	security	through stable access to pension funds, health insurance, and opportunities for career development. Mitigation efforts must also address the vulnerability of family members who remain behind. Researchers point out the need to improve rural populations’ living conditions through greater access to health care, childcare, and education; and through more investment in rural infrastructure such as transport and communications systems. •		Policymakers	and	the	private	sector	should	make	migration	safer	and	more	beneficial for migrants by providing adequate information on the migration process and the destination countries. Before leaving, workers should be given the opportunity to receive training in the skills required by host countries’ labour markets.Ganesh Gurung, PhD Executive Director Institute for Development Studies (NIDS), Nepalganesgrg@mos.com.npThe National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South is a worldwide research net work including six partner institutions in Switzerland and some 140 universities, research institutions, and development organi sations in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Europe. Approxi-mately 350  researchers worldwide contribute to the activities of the NCCR North-South.  NCCR North-South Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) University of Bern Hallerstrasse 10 3012 Bern Switzerlandwww.north-south.unibe.chThis issueAcademic adviser: Prof. Ulrike Müller-Böker, DSGZEditor: Claudia MichelEditorial support: Tina Hirschbuehl, Anu LannenDesign: Simone KummerPrinted by Printed by Varicolor AG, Bern Citation: Thieme S, Ghimire A, Gurung G. 2014. Making migration safer [updated]. Evidence for Policy Series, Global Edition, No. 2b. Bern, Switzerland: NCCR North-South.evidence for policy evidence for policy provides research highlights from the NCCR North-South on important development issues. The policy brief series offers information on topics such as governance, conflict, livelihoods, globalisa-tion, sanitation, health, natural resources, and sustainability in an accessible way. evidence for policy and further research information are available at: www.north-south.unibe.ch  

Making migration safer

ZORA

Zurich Open Repository andArchiveUniversity of ZurichMain LibraryStrickhofstrasse 39CH-8057 Zurichwww.zora.uzh.chYear: 2014Making migration safer [updated]Thieme, Susan; Ghimire, Anita; Gurung, GaneshAbstract: In a globalising market, labour migration in low-skilled sectors plays an important role. Agrowing number of poor people move between their villages of origin, capital cities, and internationaldestinations, while financially sustaining their families and home countries. The positive role of remit-tances for alleviating the poverty of sending countries is widely acknowledged. However, migration alsoleads to a growing imbalance between rural and urban areas and certain unfavourable societal changes.Drawing on case studies in Central and South Asia, this issue of evidence for policy examines the chal-lenges of making migration safer and more beneficial for low-skilled workers.Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of ZurichZORA URL: http://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-93057Published VersionOriginally published at:Thieme, Susan; Ghimire, Anita; Gurung, Ganesh (2014). Making migration safer [updated]. Evidencefor Policy / NCCR North-South, 2014(2b):online.Making migration safer Policy messageQLabour migrants in the low-skilled sector have a strong potential to be development agents in poverty alleviation.QConsidering migration in development means taking into account the different stages of migration, from departure to return. For example, information and vocational training benefit migrants before they leave the country.QCircular migration should be facilitated by governments with measures such as flexible residency, citizenship rights, and portable benefits.QThe migrants’ social and economic security and the impact on families left behind should be considered. Circular migrationWorldwide, more than 214 million people live outside their countries of origin. About half of these are labour migrants, making significant contribu-tions to the economies of both receiv-ing (host) and sending (home) coun-tries. This has resulted in a widespread recognition of the advantages of mi-gration. Policymakers and develop-ment agencies now consider labour migrants as new development agents. For example, the UN has initiated a High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development (since 2006). Or in the case of Nepal, the government recently drafted a nation-al “Foreign Employment Policy 2011” – this policy is the most relevant na-tional norm governing international labour migration out of Nepal.  Despite increased international and national awareness of migrants and their economic contributions, much remains to be done in terms of clarify-ing and improving their legal status. NCCR North-South research on migra-tion in Asian countries has shown that due to their perceived temporary status and high mobility, migrants’ rights as citizens as well as their living Updated edition 2014........................ In a globalising market, labour migration in low-skilled sectors plays an important role. A growing number of poor people move between their villages of origin, capital cities, and international destinations, while  financially sustaining their families and home countries. The positive role  of remittances for alleviating the poverty of sending countries is widely acknowledged. However, migration also leads to a growing imbalance between rural and urban areas and certain unfavourable societal changes. Drawing on case studies in Central and South Asia, this issue of evidence  for policy examines the challenges of making migration safer and more beneficial for low-skilled workers.Kathmandu airport: Nepali workers about to depart for the Gulf region (2012). Outmigration and resulting remittances are a main pillar of Nepal’s economy. Photo: Anita Ghimire Case studies featured here were conducted in: India, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Pakistanand working conditions are still fre-quently neglected by both their host country and their home country. Remittance economies  in AsiaMigration benefits both host and home countries. Host countries bene-fit economically, since migrants con-tribute labour. And home countries benefit economically, since migrants send home remittances. Indeed, re-mittances are the second-most impor-tant source of external funding for South Asian countries such as Bangla-desh, India, Pakistan, and Nepal. In Nepal’s case, remittances from labour migration have been identified as accounting for 22 percent of the country’s GDP (World Bank 2013). Despite a recent protracted civil war in Nepal, the country has managed to achieve several of its MDG goals relat-ed to economic and social aims. Most experts and development practition-ers in Nepal credit remittances for enabling sustained improvements in the lives of many Nepalis, even dur-ing times of severe conflict. In Paki-stan, remittances were a major source of funding in rebuilding the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) after the earthquake in 2005. Examples from Central Asia show that Kyr-gyzstani migrants working in Russia and Kazakhstan send home remittanc-es that contribute as much as 30 per-cent of the country’s GDP in a given year (World Bank 2013). Alleviating povertyThe positive role of remittances and their potential contribution for poverty alleviation has been recognised across South Asia. Bangladesh and Pakistan have set up separate ministries for the welfare of their migrant communities abroad. In rural communities with little cash income, even small transfers of money are highly valued as they re-duce vulnerability to risks such as crop failure, food shortages, or disease. For Nepali migrants and their families, having family members in neighbour-ing India assures access to medical treatment and education. It also means there are fewer family members strain-ing the household budget.Economies that have grown depend-ent on remittances, however, are vul-nerable. Researchers have found that unreliable remittances are a major financial threat to households in rural NWFP, Pakistan. Further, remittances alone cannot replace the overall con-tribution made by family members to their family (e.g., through parental or family care) or made by citizens to their state (e.g., through participation in the political process or social movements).Countries’ shifting  migration roleSouth Asia is not just a region that sends migrants elsewhere. It is also an important receiving and transit region. For example, though known globally as a migrant-sending country, Nepal itself hosts many Bangladeshi An older couple and their grandchild in Kyrgyzstan: those who remain behind are often greatly affected by the insecure position of family members working abroad. Thus, introduc-ing measures that assure safe migration also aids non-migrating family members – frequently elderly people who must care for small children. Photo: Kazu Ahmed (2008)Featured case studiesRadio programme for Nepali migrantsFor many people from Nepal, outmigra-tion has become an increasingly impor-tant livelihood strategy, and outmigra-tion is now a pillar of Nepal’s economy. While the situation for Nepali migrants has improved, research results suggest that migrants from rural areas of Nepal often lack a solid basis for making in-formed choices about working abroad, since public and private services for migrants are concentrated in Kathman-du. Migrants’ main source of information tends to be the brokers at employment agencies (known locally as “manpower agencies”) who help arrange for work placements abroad. But the information that brokers provide is often biased or distorted to benefit the agencies them-selves and does not necessarily help mi-grants make informed choices. A radio project has made it possible to better in-form migrants and potential migrants of the dangers and opportunities they face. The programme was set up as an infor-mation bulletin in partnership with an NGO, researchers, and a group of wom-en migrant returnees. About 200 local “listeners’ clubs” were established to provide radio access, collect feedback, and encourage wider dissemination of information. As no sound migration pol-icy and official information mechanisms exist in Nepal to date, the programme has helped bridge the information gap.Need for infrastructure develop-ment in Kyrgyz migration areasSmall and medium-sized towns are important intermediary points between rural and urban areas in Kyrgyzstan. They provide social and economic services that not only make a return of migrants more likely but also enable non-migrants to obtain access to health care, childcare, and education. Scholars call for policies that support urban–rural integration and provide public invest-ment to encourage the flow of goods and resources across sectors and locations. A more integrated economy offers more choices and allows individu-als and households to pursue their own best paths out of poverty. The rise of a more diversified non-farm economy can thus result in positive transformation. and Indian workers as well as Tibetan and Bhutanese refugees. Due to dif-fering national migration policies in the region, certain countries function as transition hubs and meeting places for professionals of different national-ities. For example, while there are strict policies in place that limit mi-gration between India and Pakistan, both Indians and Pakistanis can easily migrate to Nepal. In this way, Nepal and other countries (e.g., Maldives) have become favourable meeting and transition hubs for migrants from other countries in South Asia. Rural–urban divideThe interdependence between inter-nal and international migration is clearly apparent. While the urban–ru-ral divide is a driving factor of migra-tion, it is also perpetuated as a result of migration. People leave their villag-es in search of opportunities in the cities – in their own country or abroad. A study in Kyrgyzstan has shown that although most migrants wish to return to their home country, their first choice would be the capital, Bishkek, rather than their village of origin. Reasons not to return to rural areas include fewer economic oppor-tunities and a lack of social or medi-cal services.Social changeMigration redefines the division of labour and responsibilities. This af-fects migrants themselves and those who remain behind. In Pakistan, agri-cultural work has become increasing-ly feminised due to male outmigra-tion. In Nepal, migration itself has become feminised, as female outmi-gration is a growing trend. NCCR North-South researchers discovered that those who remain behind not only face a greater workload, they also assume more decision-making responsibility – as found in the case of migrants’ wives left behind in Ne-pal. During the Maoist conflict in Ne-pal, women were also left to negoti-ate with the conflicting parties – a new dynamic in the Nepali context.Social and economic  protectionWhile migrants’ remittances are wel-comed by their home countries, the migrants themselves are rarely con-sidered in policymaking and develop-ment interventions. In the host coun-tries, migrants’ mobility is often restricted, their livelihoods are left vulnerable, and they themselves are harassed by the authorities. Lack of adequate education, lack of know-ledge about the host country, and insecure working and living condi-tions make it hard for migrants to recover the costs associated with migration (e.g., debts, placement fees, travel), hamper their ability to send remittances to relatives back home, and prevent them from saving enough money to invest in the future. Many migrants live from hand to mouth.The female face of migrationNational migration policies are often gendered and limit the international migration of women. Nepal, for exam-ple, has restricted women’s labour migration to specific countries, such as the Gulf States. This was suppos-edly done in the name of “positive discrimination” – in order to protect women from being exploited as do-mestic workers. However, women have continued to migrate from Ne-pal, often using irregular channels that expose them to even greater risk. While a recent policy amendment ended Nepal’s total ban on female labour migration to Gulf countries, women under the age of 32 are still restricted from doing so. In Pakistan, female labour migration was com-pletely banned for many years. Now, for the first time, a new draft policy currently under discussion would enable broad-based female labour migration.DefinitionCircular migrationThe International Organization for Migration (IOM) defines circular migration as the fluid movement, of people between countries, including temporary or long-term movement which may be beneficial to all involved if occurring voluntarily and linked to the labour needs of countries of origin and destination (www.iom.int).Strengthening migrants’ wives in PakistanIn Pakistan, male labour migration often increases the vulnerability of family members who remain behind. In particular, women’s mobility is often restricted in the absence of male companions. Migrants’ wives face greater difficulties in accessing health care facilities because a male chaper-one is typically required for them to venture outside the homestead. Yet, international experience has shown that social networks based on women’s common interest and characterised by more egalitarian relations between the members have the potential to enhance their resilience. Therefore, village organisations, researchers, and NGOs have  entered into a partnership to promote the formation of inter-house-hold, village-level organisations among transnational migrants’ wives in the Upper Dir district in Pakistan. Featured case studies, cont.A Nepali woman doing domestic work in Lebanon (2012). Banning women’s migration has not stopped them from leaving in search of work. It has exposed them to even greater risks of exploitation. Photo: NIDSFurther readingGhimire A and Upreti BR. 2010. The forgot-ten forces: The role of migrants in post-con-flict state building. In: Upreti BR, Sharma SR, Pyakuryal KN, Ghimire S, editors. 2010. The Remake of a State: Post-conflict Challenges and State Building in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: NCCR North-South South Asia Regional Coordination Office and Human and Natural Resources Studies Centre (HNRSC), Kathmandu University.Ghimire A, Upreti BR, Gurung G, Adhikari J, Arnoy J, Thieme S, editors. 2012. Nepal Migration Yearbook 2011. Kathmandu, Nepal: NIDS and NCCR North-South. Siegmann KA. 2010. Strengthening whom? The role of international migration for women and men in Northwest Pakistan. Progress in Development 10(4):345–361. Thieme S. 2012. Coming home? Patterns and characteristics of return migration in Kyr-gyzstan. International Migration. [Early View (online version of record published before inclusion in an issue).  DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00724.x]World Bank. 2013. Migration and Remittances. [http://tinyurl.com/2ughy8; accessed  20 November 2013]......................................................Susan Thieme, PhDSenior Teaching and Research Associate University of Zurich susan.thieme@geo.uzh.chAnita Ghimire, PhDPostdoctoral Fellow NCCR North-Southbhattarainitu@gmail.comThe NCCR North-South is co-financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and the participating institutions. The views expressed in evidence for policy belong to the author(s) concerned and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the funding agencies, the overall NCCR North-South network, or other institutions.Keywords: circular migration, development agents, remittances, low-skilled workers, civil rights, economic security, social protection, India, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Pakistan Policy implications of NCCR North-South researchr.JHSBUJPOQPMJDJFTTIPVMETFQBSBUFMZBEESFTTUIFEJGGFSFOUTUBHFTPGNJHSBUJPOlife in the home country, pre-departure preparations, and travelling to as well as working and living in the host country. The lives and movements of low-skilled workers (mainly from rural areas) should be systematically addressed when planning, implementing, and evaluating development programmes in home and host countries. There should also be greater cooperation between institutions that are formally in charge of migration issues and others that are not, such as migrants’ associations or local microfinance groups.r'BDJMJUBUJOHCFOFGJDJBMDJSDVMBSNJHSBUJPOSFRVJSFTFMJNJOBUJPOPGEJTJODFOUJWFTUPsuch circulation, primarily by providing flexible residency and citizenship rights. This would not only reduce irregular migration and risks of human trafficking, it would also allow migrants to limit expenses associated with migration, enabling them to save money and acquire the skills needed for a more successful return. r&GGPSUTNVTUCFNBEFUPJNQSPWFNJHSBOUTTPDJBMBOEFDPOPNJDTFDVSJUZthrough stable access to pension funds, health insurance, and opportunities for career development. Mitigation efforts must also address the vulnerability of family members who remain behind. Researchers point out the need to improve rural populations’ living conditions through greater access to health care, childcare, and education; and through more investment in rural infrastructure such as transport and communications systems. r1PMJDZNBLFSTBOEUIFQSJWBUFTFDUPSTIPVMENBLFNJHSBUJPOTBGFSBOENPSFbeneficial for migrants by providing adequate information on the migration process and the destination countries. Before leaving, workers should be given the opportunity to receive training in the skills required by host countries’ labour markets.Ganesh Gurung, PhD Executive Director Institute for Development Studies (NIDS), Nepalganesgrg@mos.com.npThe National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South is a worldwide research net work including six partner institutions in Switzerland and some 140 universities, research institutions, and development organi sations in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Europe. Approxi-mately 350  researchers worldwide contribute to the activities of the NCCR North-South.  NCCR North-South Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) University of Bern Hallerstrasse 10 3012 Bern Switzerlandwww.north-south.unibe.chThis issueAcademic adviser: Prof. Ulrike Müller-Böker, DSGZEditor: Claudia MichelEditorial support: Tina Hirschbuehl, Anu LannenDesign: Simone KummerPrinted by Printed by Varicolor AG, Bern Citation: Thieme S, Ghimire A, Gurung G. 2014. Making migration safer [updated]. Evidence for Policy Series, Global Edition, No. 2b. Bern, Switzerland: NCCR North-South.evidence for policy evidence for policy provides research highlights from the NCCR North-South on important development issues. The policy brief series offers information on topics such as governance, conflict, livelihoods, globalisa-tion, sanitation, health, natural resources, and sustainability in an accessible way. evidence for policy and further research information are available at: www.north-south.unibe.ch  

Making migration safer [updated]

http://www.zora.uzh.ch/93057/1/2014_ThiemeS_etal_PB_SafeMigration_Kopie_.pdf

Making migration safer [updated]

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Bern Open Repository and Information System (BORIS)

ZORA