6_22_1982_PERB_BD_DecisionsOCR.pdf: 112 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020

New York State Public Employment Relations Board

English

11_20_1981_PERB_BD_DecisionsOCR.pdf: 75 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020

eCommons (Cornell Univ.)

State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from November 20, 1981

DigitalCommons@ILR

State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from March 17, 1981

State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from June 22, 1982

State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from September 22, 1982

11_11_1980_PERB_BD_DecisionsOCR.pdf: 87 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020

State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from November 11, 1980

3_31_1981_PERB_BD_DecisionsOCR.pdf: 67 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020

State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from March 31, 1981

10_28_1982_PERB_BD_DecisionsOCR.pdf: 121 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020

State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from October 28, 1982

Cornell University ILR School 
DigitalCommons@ILR 
Board Decisions - NYS PERB New York State Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) 
3-31-1981 
State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions 
from March 31, 1981 
New York State Public Employment Relations Board 
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/perbdecisions 
Thank you for downloading an article from DigitalCommons@ILR. 
Support this valuable resource today! 
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the New York State Public Employment Relations Board 
(PERB) at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Board Decisions - NYS PERB by an 
authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact catherwood-
dig@cornell.edu. 
If you have a disability and are having trouble accessing information on this website or need materials in an 
alternate format, contact web-accessibility@cornell.edu for assistance. 
State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from March 31, 
1981 
Keywords 
NY, NYS, New York State, PERB, Public Employment Relations Board, board decisions, labor disputes, 
labor relations 
Comments 
This document is part of a digital collection provided by the Martin P. Catherwood Library, ILR School, 
Cornell University. The information provided is for noncommercial educational use only. 
This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/perbdecisions/225 
#2A-3/31/81 
BOARD DECISION 
AND ORDER 
STATE OF NEW YORK 
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD 
In the Matter of 
WEST HEMPSTEAD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, 
Respondent, 
- and -
_WES_T_HEMP_S_TE AD_AID-ES,AS-SnC T A T T OH,, — — : CAS-E-NO-.—U-^ 4-0^ -6 
Charging Party. : 
HENRY A. WEINSTEIN, ESQ., for Respondent 
KAPLOWITZ & GALINSON, ESQS. (BARBARA J. JOHNSON,ESQ., 
of Counsel), for Charging Party 
The West Hempstead Union Free School District abolished 
five teacher aide positions, the incumbents of which had per-
formed supervisory duties in the high school cafeteria, ter-
minated the employment of these employees and assigned the 
cafeteria supervision to teachers who performed these assign-
ments for one period per day at extra pay. Four of the aides 
were later reemployed for fewer hours per day in different 
positions. 
The West Hempstead Aides Association, which represents 
the teacher- aides, filed a charge alleging that this abolition 
of unit positions and assignment of the work outside the unit 
without first negotiating with it, violates §209-a.l(d) of 
the Taylor Law. 
Upon stipulated facts obtained through an exchange of cor-
respondence between the hearing Q'fficer and the parties, the 
hearing officer found that the District acted 'on: its- .':..-.-; 
v. A ) v«J 
Board U-4056 -2 
belief that a disciplinary problem existed in the high school 
which could better be controlled by classroom teachers. He held 
that because the safety and proper supervision of students was 
involved, the District's decision was a managerial one made in 
the performance of its mission. The hearing officer therefore 
concluded that the District's decision did not involve a mandatory 
subject of negotiation. Accordingly, he dismissed the charge. 
The charging party duly filed exceptions to the hearing 
officer's decision arguing, inter alia, that the employer's 
mission, i.e., the service it chooses to provide to the 
community, was not involved because the teachers perform exactly 
the same work as that performed by the teacher aides. 
While the District has maintained that the duties, assign-
ments and responsibilities of the teachers who now supervise the 
cafeteria are dissimilar to those of the teacher aides they 
replaced, there is no evidence in the record with respect to this 
claim. We deem such evidence relevant to a determination of this 
1 
matter. 
There is also no evidence in the record of the disciplinary 
problem claimed to exist in the high school cafeteria. We deem 
such evidence relevant as well. 
Accordingly, we are remanding the proceeding to the hearing 
officer to conduct a hearing for the purpose of taking evidence 
relating to the disciplinary problem claimed to exist in the 
1 North Shore Union Free School District, 10 PERB 1[3082 (1977, 
remand), 11 PERB 1[3011 (1978, final decision). 
OCU.0 
Board U-4056 
-3 
high school cafeteria and the duties, assignments and responsi-
bilities of the teachers who now supervise the cafeteria and the 
teacher aides who formerly supervised the cafeteria. The hearing 
officer is to submit to this Board- a report of his evidentiary 
findings, with copies to the parties, who may file exceptions to 
such findings. 
DATED: Albany, New York 
March 31, 1981 
Ha'rold R. Newman, Chairman 
£Uos Mddut^ 
I d a K l a u s , Member 
David C. R a n d i e s , Memlzfer 
e C"i] 1 
L* •- .* „>.--. _*w 
STATE OF NEW YORK 
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD 
In the Matter of 
EAST SYRACUSE-MINOA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, 
Employer, 
-and-
EAST SYRACUSE-MINOA CLERICAL ASSOCIATION, 
NYSUTy : — — : — — — ; — — 
P e t i t i o n e r , 
- a n d -
COUNCIL OF NON-INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL, 
I n t e r v e n o r . 
//2B-3/31/81 
BOARD DECISION 
AND ORDER 
JCASE_J!KL-JG1=1S9-4-
RICHARD ROSINSKI, ESQ., for Employer 
FRANK SQUILLACE, ESQ., for Petitioner 
SANDRA CROTTY, for Intervenor 
On March 12, 1968, the East Syracuse-Minoa Central School 
District (District) recognized the East Syracuse-Minoa Representa-
tive Council of Non-Instructional Personnel (Council) as the 
exclusive negotiating representative of the following groups of 
employees: (1) Bus Drivers, (2) Clerical Employees and Teacher 
Aides, (3) Custodians and Cleaners, (4) Food Service Handlers, 
(5) Mechanics - General and Transportation. The Council struc-
tured itself so that each of the five described groups of employees 
had a separate organizational structure and elected two repre-
sentatives to the Council to act on its behalf. The by-laws of 
the Council referred to the groups as "units of non-instructional 
personnel". The East Syracuse-Minoa Cleri'calLAssociatioii-, •". 
m. 
Board - C-1994 -2 
NYSUT ,•.:• •'.'. (Association) is the name of the organization of the 
clerical employees and teacher aides of the District. After 
affiliating with the New York State United Teachers, the Associ-
ation filed the petition herein to'be the exclusive representative! 
of the clerical employees and teacher aides. j 
Both the District and the Council opposed the petition. The 
Acting Director of Public Employment Practices and Representation 
(Director) ordered that there be an election among the employees S 
j 
in the "unit of teacher aides and clerical employees". The I 
i 
District filed exceptions to the order of the Director protesting,! 
among other things, that he improperly fragmented the existing 
negotiating unit. On the record before it, this Board could not j 
determine whether the original recognition of the Council was as 
representative of a single unit consisting of five groups or of 
five separate units. Were it the latter, the Acting. Director's 
decision would not have fragmented any existing unit. Were it 
the former, the existing unit would have been fragmented and the 
Acting Director would have had to have dealt with the question of 
whether the existing unit or the proposed unit were more appro-
priate. Accordingly, we remanded the matter for further pro-
ceedings. Upon remand, the Acting Director held a further hear-
ing. The evidence at that hearing did not establish the nature 
i 
of the original recognition. It did show, however, that from 
1968 through 1978, the locus of the more significant negotiations j 
had been at the group level and that, in 1978, it shifted to the 
Council level. 
Board - C-1994 -3 
The Acting Director did not find it necessary to decide 
whether the original recognition had created one or five units 
because of his conclusion that clerical employees and teacher 
aides had been afforded inadequate representation by the Council 
for the reason that the other four groups comprising the Council 
gave low priority in the negotiations to the clerical employees 
anji_t^ eacher_aid.e_s1, He_thex_ef-Or_e_conclu 
did not constitute a single cohesive unit. Accordingly, even if 
there had been a single unit, it would be appropriate to fragment 
that unit by excluding the clerical employees because of an 
internal conflict of interest as between the clerical employees 
and teacher aides and the other four groups comprising the Council. 
The District and the Council have both filed exceptions to 
the decision of the Acting Director. They argue that he has I 
misinterpreted the evidence and that the record does not justify 
fragmentation of the existing unit, which consists of five groups. 
We have reviewed the evidence and conclude that it supports the 
determination of the Acting Director. 
NOW, THEREFORE, WE AFFIRM the findings of fact and con- | 
elusions of law of the Acting Director, and, by reason of the 
foregoing, we find the appropriate unit to consist of all clerical 
employees and teacher aides to the exclusion of all other 
employees, as determined by the Acting Director, and 
WE ORDER that an election by secret ballot shall be held 
among those within the unit who were employed on 
the payroll date immediately preceding the date of 
this decision. 
14 
Board - C-1994 -4 
WE FURTHER ORDER that the District submit to the Director, 
the Council and the Association, an alphabetized 
list of unit employees within ten days of the 
receipt of this decision. 
If the intervenor desires to participate in the 
election, it shall so advise the Director, the District and 
—~the_As-S-0-C-iat-ion--by^ writien^ noiiae-3rlt±inu4^ en_day-s_o-f_it.s 
receipt of this decision. If such notice is not received, 
the Association may, within ten days thereafter, submit to 
the Director evidence sufficient to satisfy the requirements 
of §201.9(g)(1) of the Rules of this Board for certifica-
tion without an election. 
DATED: Albany, New York 
March 31, 1981 
ihfc»*uZ/£ w» 
Harold R. Newman, Chairman 
£#**•* /Cf24UA*>4. 
I d a KL^tas ,/ Member 
David C. R a n d i e s , Member 
R1F 
STATE OF NEW YORK 
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD 
In the Matter of 
POLAND CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, 
Employer, 
-and-
POLAND CENTRAL SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS 
ASSOCIATION, 
Pet iTTi on e r7~ 
On June 23, 19 80, the Poland Central School Bus Drivers 
Association (petitioner) filed, in accordance with the Rules 
of Procedure of the Public Employment Relations Board, a timely 
petition for certification as the exclusive negotiating repre-
sentative of certain employees of the Poland Central School 
^ District ('employer) . -. , 
On January 20, 1981, the Director of Public Employment 
Practices and Representation ordered that a secret ballot 
election be conducted among employees in the following unit: 
Included: All full-time and part-time non-
instructional employees. 
Excluded: Substitute bus drivers and employees 
who occupy the position of head bus 
drivers, head mechanic, cafeteria 
manager, head custodian or superintendent's 
secretary. 
Pursuant to that order, a secret ballot election was held 
on February 27, 1981. The results of the election indicate that 
the majority of eligible voters in the unit who cast valid ballots 
do not desire to be represented for purposes of collective 
#2C-3/31/81 
BOARD DECISION AND 
ORDER 
CASE NO. C-20 8.7 
1/ Poland Cen t ra l School D i s t r i c t , 14 PERB 1[40Q7, 6826 
Board - C-2087 
2/ 
negotiations by the petitioner. 
Therefore, it is ordered that the petition be, and it hereby 
is, dismissed. 
Dated: Albany, New York 
March 31, 1981 
. W-^~&UH<_^ 
arold R.Newman,Chairman 
3*t*u. / C ^ C ^ ^ 
Ida Klaus, Member 
David C. Randies, Memb< 
6617 
2/ There were 14 ballots cast in favor of and 21 ballots against 
representation by the petitioner. One challenged ballot was 
cast but it was not sufficient to affect the results of the 
election. 
STATE OF NEW YOR' 
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATJ S BOARD 
In the Matter of 
TOWN OF AMHERST, 
Employer, 
Case No. C-2051 
- and 
AMHERST EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, 
Petitioner, 
- and -
AFSCME, COUNCIL 66, LOCAL 1783B, 
AFL-CIO, 
Intervenor. 
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVE AND ORDER TO NEGOTIATE 
#3A-3/31/81 
A representation proceeding having been conducted in the 
above matter by the Public Employment Relations Board in accord-
ance with the Public Employees' Fair Employment Act and the' 
Rules of Procedure of the Board, and it appearing that a 
negotiating representative has been selected, 
•Pursuant to the authority vested in the Boerd by the 
Public Employees' Fair Employment Act, 
IT-IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the Amherst Employees Association 
has been designated and selected ,by a majority of the employees 
; of the above named public employer, in the unit described below, 
i as their exclusive representative for the purpose of collective 
I negotiations and the settlement of grievances. 
i 
| Unit: Included: Laborer, Laborer Foreman, Working Foreman, 
I Sewage Treatment Plant Operator, Sewer 
! Maintenance Man, Senior Maintenance Man, 
• ' .. Motor Equipment Operator, Automotive Mechanic 
j and Mason. 
Excluded: All other employees. 
Further, IT IS ORDERED^that the above named'public employer 
j shall negotiate collectively with the Amherst Employees Association; 
i . • • , 
i and enter into a written agreement with such employee organization 
•with regard to terms and conditions of employment, and shall 
'; negotiate collectively with such employee organization in^ the 
; determination of, and administration of, grievances. I 
Signed on the 31st day of March; 19 81 
Albany, New York 
larold R. Newman, Chairman 
I.'ERF. 5 0.4 ;.si8 
Jk^UcLL 
I d a KliftoS/, Mtmbei 
«Afafefi-T, 


Cornell University ILR School 
DigitalCommons@ILR 
Board Decisions - NYS PERB New York State Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) 
7-13-1983 
State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions 
from July 13, 1983 
New York State Public Employment Relations Board 
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/perbdecisions 
Thank you for downloading an article from DigitalCommons@ILR. 
Support this valuable resource today! 
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the New York State Public Employment Relations Board 
(PERB) at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Board Decisions - NYS PERB by an 
authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact catherwood-
dig@cornell.edu. 
If you have a disability and are having trouble accessing information on this website or need materials in an 
alternate format, contact web-accessibility@cornell.edu for assistance. 
State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from July 13, 
1983 
Keywords 
NY, NYS, New York State, PERB, Public Employment Relations Board, board decisions, labor disputes, 
labor relations 
Comments 
This document is part of a digital collection provided by the Martin P. Catherwood Library, ILR School, 
Cornell University. The information provided is for noncommercial educational use only. 
This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/perbdecisions/242 
STATE OF NEW YORK 
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD 
In the Matter of 
ROTTERDAM-M^HONASEN~CENTRArr^SCHOOL 
DISTRICT. 
Respondent, 
-and- CASE NO. U-6674 
MOHONASEN TEACHERS ASSOCIATION. 
NYSUT. AFT. AFL-CIO, 
Charging Party. 
PEMBERTON. BUCHYN & O'HARE. ESQS. (JOSEPH BUCHYN. 
ESQ., of Counsel), for Respondent 
RUBY P. NICHOLSON, for Charging Party 
BOARD DECISION AND ORDER 
This matter comes to us on the exceptions of the 
Rotterdam-Mohonasen Central School District (District) to a 
decision of a hearing officer that it violated §209-a.l(d) of 
the Taylor Law by refusing a demand of the Mohonasen Teachers 
Association. NYSUT. AFT. AFL-CIO (Association) to 
Board - U-6674 
-2 
negotiate the impact of its decision to increase the student 
contact hours of two physical education teachers. 
The hearing officer issued his decision, without holding 
a hearing. He had indicated to the parties^ that no hearing 
would be held unless an offer of proof of additional facts 
beyond those submitted to him at an earlier conference was 
submitted. He thereafter concluded that the offer of proof 
by the District did not warrant the holding of a hearing. 
Among the exceptions of the District to the hearing officer's 
decision is the assertion that the hearing officer erred in 
denying it a hearing because there were facts in dispute. 
In addition, the District urges in its exceptions that 
the conduct complained of did not involve a unilateral change 
in terms and conditions of employment and therefore the 
impact of that decision need not be negotiated. The District 
also argues that the hearing officer erred in not finding 
that a provision of the parties' agreement constitutes a 
waiver by the Association of mid-contract negotiations on 
impact matters. 
We are unable to make a proper determination of the 
issues involved in this charge on the present record. A full 
hearing on the charge should be held. 
ACCORDINGLY. WE ORDER that the matter be remanded to the 
Board - U-6674 -3 
hearing officer for a hearing on the charge and a subsequent 
report based upon the record made at such hearing. 
DATED:—July—1-3-,^ 1-9 8 3 
Albany, New York 
Harowd R. Newman, Chairman 
&U-AV*. l^<^. 
Ida Klaus. Member 
»*-i.> 
David C. Randies. Member 
STATE OF NEW YORK 
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD 
In the Matter of 
UNITED UNIVERSITY PROFESSIONS, INC.. 
NEW YORK STATE UNITED TEACHERS, and 
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS. 
Respondent, 
-and- CASE NO. U-6263 
THOMAS C. BARRY. 
Charging Party. 
BERNARD F. ASHE, ESQ. (IVOR R. MOSKOWITZ. ESQ.. of 
Counsel), for Respondent 
THOMAS C. BARRY, pro. se 
BOARD DECISION AND ORDER 
This matter comes to us on the exceptions of Thomas C. 
Barry to the decision of a hearing officer dismissing his 
charge that United University Professions. Inc. (UUP) does 
not have a proper agency shop fee refund procedure in that 
• \ 
Board - U-6263 -2 
the final appellate step of the refund procedure does not 
cover the portion of agency shop fees transmitted to UUP's 
affiliates. New York State United Teachers (NYSUT) and 
American Federation of Teachers (AFT)— 
Barry made four allegations in support of his charge 
relating to the lack of review of the affiliates' share of 
the agency shop fees. Three of those allegations are 
supported by the record: Between 60 and 70% of the agency 
shop monies received by UUP go to NYSUT and AFT; neither 
NYSUT nor AFT has a refund procedure; the final appellate 
step of the UUP's refund procedure is a determination by a 
neutral. 
) 
i/At an earlier stage of this proceeding, the 
Director of Public Employment Practices and Representation 
(Director) dismissed Barry's charge against UUP on the 
ground that it failed to set forth a prima facie case. 
Upon review, we determined that to the extent that the 
charge alleged that the refund procedure insulates the 
portion of the agency shop fee transmitted to the 
affiliates from the review by the neutral, the charge 
stated a prima facie case. We agreed with the Director 
that two other aspects of the charge did not set forth a 
prima facie case. We remanded the matter for a 
determination whether the facts support that part of the 
charge sustained by us. The decision of the hearing 
officer herein, upon remand, concludes that they do not. 
) 
Board - U-6263 -3 
Barry's fourth allegation is that the neutral review is 
limited to agency shop fee monies retained by UUP and does 
not extend to monies transmitted to NYSUT and AFT. The 
hearing officer has determined that the fourth allegation is 
not sustained. The only evidence in support of that 
allegation is a statement contained in the decision of the 
neutral designated under the UUP procedure to determine the 
amount of the refund due from UUP to agency shop fee payers 
for 1977-78 agency shop fee payments. He interpreted the 
submission to him to mean that: "I should not go behind the 
representations of NYSUT and AFT with respect to the amount 
of refund due from the expenditures of each organization." 
While this statement by itself might indicate that the 
agency shop fee monies sent by UUP to NYSUT and AFT have been 
insulated from any review by the neutral, the record of 
proceedings before the neutral actually shows a contrary view 
on his part. Thus, he noted that the financial reports of 
NYSUT and AFT. which were made part of the record before him. 
included financial information regarding the expenditures of 
NYSUT and AFT.- Moreover, he made clear that UUP' s 
i/This is the same kind of information as we require_ 
an employee organization to furnish to employees along with 
their agency shop fee refunds. Hampton Bays Teachers 
Assn.. 14 PERB ir3018 (1981). 
8388 
Board - U-6263 -4 
burden of establishing the correctness of the total refund 
extended to the amounts due from NYSUT and AFT. 
In further support of his exceptions, Barry also relies 
upon statements contained in the decision of the neutral 
designated to determine the amount of the refund due to 
agency shop fee payers for 1978-79 agency shop fee payments. 
The record of that proceeding shows that the neutral defined 
the issue before him as including review of the affiliates' 
expenditures as well as that of UUP. The record also shows 
that UUP recognized that it had to submit to the neutral the 
financial reports prepared by NYSUT and AFT. 
We are accordingly satisfied that the neutrals were not 
barred by UUP from reviewing the expenditures of the 
affiliates and that the neutrals took evidence in relation 
thereto. Barry, in his exceptions, appears to argue that the 
neutrals did not have sufficient evidence before them to 
support their decisions and that UUP did not provide them 
with satisfactory evidence. This objection is beyond our 
jurisdiction to consider since it goes to the merits of the 
neutrals' decisions. Hampton Bays Teachers Assn.. supra. 
Board - U-6263 -5 
Accordingly, we affirm the findings and conclusions of 
the hearing officer. 
NOW. THEREFORE. WE ORDER that the charge herein be. and 
it hereby is, dismissed. 
DATED: July 13. 1983 
Albany. New York 
old R. Newman. Chairman 
CA^JIS*-
&L. /az*~—-
Ida Klaus. Member 
David C. Randies, Member 
STATE OF NEW YORK 
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD 
In the Matter of 
BUFFALO MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, 
Employer, 
-and- CASE NO. C-2625 
CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION. 
INC.. LOCAL 1000. AFSCME. AFL-CIO, 
Petitioner, 
-and-
BUFFALO HOUSING AUTHORITY SECURITY 
OFFICERS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, 
Intervenor. 
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVE AND ORDER TO NEGOTIATE 
A representation proceeding having been conducted in the 
above matter by the Public Employment Relations Board in 
accordance with the Public Employees' Fair Employment Act and the 
Rules of Procedure of the Board, and it appearing that a 
negotiating representative has been selected. 
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Board by the Public 
Employees' Fair Employment Act. 
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the Civil Service Employees 
Association. Inc., Local 1000. AFSCME. AFL-CIO has been 
designated and selected by a majority of the employees of the 
above named public employer, in the unit agreed upon by the 
parties and described below, as their exclusive representative 
for the purpose of collective negotiations and the settlement of 
grievances. Q2!^ 
5*r ,k>;L<»'' 
Certification - C-2625 page 2 
Unit: Included: 
Excluded 
Housing security officer, housing 
security sergeant. 
All other employees. 
Further. IT IS ORDERED that the above named public employer 
shall negotiate collectively with the Civil Service Employees 
Association. Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO and enter into a 
written agreement with such employee organization with regard to 
terms and conditions of employment of the employees in the unit 
found appropriate, and shall negotiate collectively with such 
employee organization in the determination of, and administration 
of, grievances of such employees. 
DATED: July 13. 1983 
Albany, New York 
Harold R. Newman. Chairman 
<%Lg, ££<Ls**-~ 
Ida Klaus. Member 
David C. Randies, Member i r^  
v> ijf 
STATE OF NEW YORK 
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD 
In the Matter of 
BAY SHORE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT 
Employer. 
-and- CASE NO. C-2591 
BAY SHORE CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION 
Petitioner, 
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVE AND ORDER TO NEGOTIATE 
A representation proceeding having been conducted in the 
above matter by the Public Employment Relations Board in 
accordance with the Public Employees' Fair Employment Act and the 
Rules of Procedure of the Board, and it appearing that a 
negotiating representative has been selected. 
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Board by the Public 
Employees' Fair Employment Act. 
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the Bay Shore Classroom Teachers 
Association has been designated and selected by a majority of the 
employees of the above named public employer, in the unit agreed 
upon by the parties and described below, as their exclusive 
representative for the purpose of collective negotiations and the 
settlement of grievances. 
Unit: Included: All substitute teachers who have 
received a reasonable assurance 
of continuing employment in 
accordance with subdivision 10 of 
section 590 of the Labor Law. 
Excluded: All other employees. 
«.- 8393 
Certification - C-2591 page 2 
Further. IT IS ORDERED that the above named public employer 
shall negotiate collectively with the Bay Shore Classroom 
Teachers Association and enter into a written agreement with such 
employee organization with regard to terms and conditions of 
employment of the employees in the unit found appropriate, and 
shall negotiate collectively with such employee organization in 
the determination of. and administration of. grievances of such 
employees. 
DATED: July 13. 1983 
Albany, New York 
Harold R. Newman, Chairman 
<%*. &l '^4^ 
Ida Klaus. Member 
STATE OF NEW YORK 
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD 
In the Matter of 
CATTARAUGUS-ALLEGANY-ERIE-WYOMING 
COUNTIES BOCES. 
Employer, 
-and~ CASE NO. C-2595 
ENCHANTED MOUNTAIN TEACHERS ASSOCIATION/ 
NEA/NY. 
Petitioner. 
-and-
CATTARAUGUS COUNTY BOCES TEACHERS 
ASSOCIATION/NYSUT. 
Intervenor. 
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVE AND ORDER TO NEGOTIATE 
A representation proceeding having been conducted in the 
above matter by the Public Employment Relations Board in 
accordance with the Public Employees' Fair Employment Act and the 
Rules of Procedure of the Board, and it appearing that a 
negotiating representative has been selected. 
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Board by the Public 
Employees' Fair Employment Act. 
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the Cattaraugus County BOCES 
Teachers Association/NYSUT has been designated and selected by a 
majority of the employees of the above named public employer, in 
the unit agreed upon by the parties and described below, as their 
) exclusive representative for the purpose of collective 
negotiations and the settlement of grievances. 
, 8395 
Certification - C-2595 page 2 
Unit: Included: 
Excluded: 
All certified personnel. 
Administration personnel 
Further. IT IS ORDERED that the above named public employer 
shall—negotiate_colI:ectiv-eXy^ _wix;jh_tJie_Cat_taraUgus Co_unty_J30CES 
Teachers Association/NYSUT and enter into a written agreement 
with such employee organization with regard to terms and 
conditions of employment of the employees in the unit found 
appropriate, and shall negotiate collectively with such employee 
organization in the determination of, and administration of, 
grievances of such employees. 
DATED: July 13, 1983 
Albany. New York 
^ ^ ^ K - ^ f c - ^ 
Newman. Chairman 
A*. /C&^U-
Ida Klaus, Member 
David C. Randiest Meraoer 
-<u 


State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from July 13, 1983

https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1162&amp;context=perbdecisions

State of New York Public Employment Relations Board Decisions from May 8, 1981

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

eCommons (Cornell Univ.)

DigitalCommons@ILR

eCommons (Cornell Univ.)

DigitalCommons@ILR

DigitalCommons@ILR

eCommons (Cornell Univ.)

eCommons (Cornell Univ.)

eCommons (Cornell Univ.)

DigitalCommons@ILR

DigitalCommons@ILR