A case of right ventricle perforation in a 63-year old man after blind needle pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion is presented, focusing on the delayed diagnosis of this serious complication. During surgical repair, the pigtail catheter was found to enter the right ventricle with its tip resting within the pulmonary artery

Easo, Jerry

Foroulis, Christophoros N.

Grosomanidis, Vassilis

Tossios, Paschalis

English

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki: Open Journals / ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ

IntroductIonPericardiocentesis has shown to be an effective meth-od for drainage of pericardial effusions. Complications such as pneumothorax, haematothorax, purulent peri-carditis, ventricular arrhythmias as well as chamber lacerations have been reported to reach up to 10% in the past1. Electrocardiographic guiding, echocardio-graphic guiding and injection of contrast media im-proved the initially blind approach and significantly reduced these complications to 2% in recent clinical studies2,3. Cardiac injuries after pericardiocentesis are rarely reported in the literature1,2,4. We present a patient with pericardial effusion who underwent peri-cardiocentesis, perforation of the right ventricle of the heart and surgery for removal of the pigtail catheter from the right ventricle.case report A 63-year old male was initially scheduled for sur-gery of iliofemoral arteriosclerotic occlusive disease. Because of history of coronary artery disease and pre-vious myocardial infarction he underwent trans-tho-racic echocardiography (TTE) during the preoperative work-up. TTE revealed a clinically “silent” pericar-dial effusion around the heart (maximum diameter of 1 cm). The left ventricular function was impaired and ejection fraction was 35%. For more than one month the patient had reported moderate symptoms includ-ing chest pain, and dyspnoea on exercise. Thus, elec-tive vascular surgery was abandoned. During his sub-sequent TTE examination 10 days later, an increase of the maximum diameter of pericardial effusion was found reaching 2 cm. Computed tomography of the chest confirmed the circular pericardial effusion, without assessment of the etiology due to a lack of other pathological findings. The patient’s symptoms worsened during the following days, leading to dys-pnoea on minimal exertion and subsequently at rest with features of orthopnoea, coughing and weakness. The next day he underwent blind needle pericardio-centesis for pericardial drainage. The procedure was felt to be uncomplicated by the performing physi-cian, however only 50 ml of serous fluid could be ini-tially aspirated. Chest radiograph after the procedure showed the pigtail catheter with the tip projecting in the superior reflection of the pericardium. These find-ings were considered to be normal. The patient was admitted to the department of car-diac surgery one day later because of chest pain and persistence of pericardial effusion. On admission the Case RepoRtdelayed diagnosis of right ventricle perforation  after blind needle pericardiocentesis.Paschalis Tossios1, Christophoros N. Foroulis1, Vassilis Grosomanidis1, Jerry Easo21AHEPA University Hopsital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thessaloniki, Greece2Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oldenburg, GermanyaBstract: A case of right ventricle perforation in a 63-year old man after blind needle pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion is presented, focusing on the delayed diagnosis of this serious complication. During surgical repair, the pigtail catheter was found to enter the right ventricle with its tip resting within the pulmonary artery. Key Words: Pericardiocentesis, Pigtail catheter, Right ventricle perforation.Corresponding author: Paschalis Tossios, MD, AHEPA University Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 1 Stilponos Kyriakidi Street, 546 36 Thessaloniki, Greece, Tel: +30 2310 994867, Fax: +30 2310 994871, e-mail: ptossios@hotmail.com, ptosios@med.auth.gr 46 Aristotle University Medical Journal, Vol. 38, Issue 3, October 2011patient was dyspnoeic and his systolic blood pressure dropped below 100 mmHg. The subsequent TTE ex-amination showed an unexpected course of the pigtail catheter within the right ventricular cavity. Moreover, continuous aspiration of pure bloody effusion over the catheter was feasible. Prior to surgical revision coronary angiography was performed revealing a two vessel disease with proximal stenoses of left anterior descending (LAD) artery and right coronary artery (RCA). In addition, cardiac cathererization confirmed the echocardiographic findings and showed the pigtail catheter passing through the right ventricle with its tip resting in the bifurcation of the pulmonary artery (Figure 1A). An emergency operation was planned and the patient reached the operating room under moderate support with inotropic drugs. After median sternotomy and pericardiotomy 300 ml of bloody ef-fusion could be collected, while the epicardial surface of the heart showed signs of inflammation with partial adherence to the pericardium. The pigtail catheter was found at the level of 27 cm to enter the apex of the right ventricle (Figure 1B). Removal of the catheter from the right ventricle was uncomplicated and the punction hole could be safely sutured. Then, LAD and RCA arteries were grafted with left internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein grafts respectively. The postoperative course was uneventful. Microbiologic and histologic examinations showed no specific infec-tion. The patient was discharged home on the tenth postoperative day. dIscussIonOver the last decades echocardiography has emerged as an important tool for the diagnostics and manage-ment of pericardial effusion with confirmation of its location and distribution. Among the various published methods of performing pericardiocentesis, the subxi-phoid approach is the one postulated by the American Heart Association5. Briefly, the needle entry site is located directly below the xiphoid, approximately 1 cm left of midline. The needle on syringe is advanced through the skin entry site at a 30° angle, directed to-wards the right shoulder. After the needle has entered the pericardial sac a pigtail catheter is inserted with the Seldinger technique. This blind approach is some-times assisted by electrocardiography to prevent myo-cardial injury. In contrast to that, echocardiographic guiding of the needle during pericardiocentesis and injection of contrast media to monitor and confirm the position of the catheter represent improved techniques with reduced complication rates2,6,7 that have been clearly demonstrated by the Stanford Experience8 and, more recently by the Mayo Clinic Experience9. These results confirmed the subxiphoid approach with echocardiographic guidance as the gold standard for the management of pericardial effusion. Figure 1. a: Cardiac catheterization shows the pigtail catheter (arrows) passing through the right ventricle into the pulmo-nary artery. B: Intraoperative view of the pigtail catheter entering the apex of the right ventricle. Iatrogenic Heart Perforation 47However, a number of puncture and catheter relat-ed complications such as pneumothorax, haematotho-rax and ventricular arrhythmias may still occur in the range of 2% to 5%2,6,7. Another, more infrequent com-plication, is the puncture of cardiac chambers. Tsang et al.9 from the Mayo Clinic reviewed 245 patients necessitating pericardiocentesis after cardiac surgery over a period of 9 years, showing an incidence of 0.8% concerning ventricular perforation. McDonald et al.10 demonstrated in his retrospective study ven-tricular perforation also with an incidence about 1% in patients treated by percutaneous catheter drainage. In the presented case, perforation of the right ventricle was diagnosed in retrospect during pericar-diocentesis, without immediate awareness of the per-forming physician. However, failure of the procedure could be determined after a delay of 24 hours on the basis of TTE providing information about the unex-pected course of the pigtail catheter. Cardiac catheter-ization and surgery confirmed these findings. In conclusion, the possibility of ventricular injury should be kept in mind while performing pericardio-centesis in patients with pericardial effusion. There-fore, we recommend pericardiocentesis to be per-formed under echocardiographic guidance.ΠΕΡΙΛΗΨΗ: Παρουσιάζεται περίπτωση ασθενούς 63 ετών, που υπέστη διάτρηση της δεξιάς κοιλίας της καρδιάς σε περι-καρδιοπαρακέντηση για εκκένωση ευμεγέθους περικαρδιακής συλλογής, εστιάζοντας κυρίως στην καθυστερημένη διάγνωση της σοβαρής αυτής επιπλοκής. Ο καθετήρας παροχέτευσης βρέθηκε διεγχειρητικά εντός της δεξιάς κοιλίας της καρδιάς, με το άκρο του να φθάνει στην πνευμονική αρτηρία.Λέξεις Κλειδιά: Περικαρδιοπαρακέντηση, Καθετήρας pigtail, Διάτρηση δεξιάς κοιλίας της καρδιάς.Καθυστερημένη διάγνωση διάτρησης της δεξιάς κοιλίας της καρδιάς  στη διάρκεια «τυφλής» περικαρδιοπαρακέντησης.Πασχάλης Τόσιος1, Χριστόφορος Ν. Φορούλης1, Βασίλης Γροσομανίδης1, Jerry Easo21Πανεπιστημιακό Νοσοκομείο ΑΧΕΠΑ, Α΄ Κλινική Θώρακος-Καρδιάς και Μεγάλων Αγγείων, Θεσσαλονίκη, Ελλάδα2Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oldenburg, GermanyreFerences  1. Bastian A., Meißner A., Lins M., Siegel EG., Möller F,. Simon R.. Pericardiocentesis: differential aspects of a common procedure. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 572-576.  2. Tsang TS., Barnes ME., Hayes SN., Freeman WK, Dearani JA., Osborn Butler SL., et al. Clinical and echo cardiographic characteristics of significant peri-cardial effusions following cardiothoracic surgery and outcomes of echo-guided pericardiocentesis for man-agement. Chest 1999; 116: 322-331.  3. Lindenberger M., Kjellberg M., Karlsson E., Wranne B. Pericardiocentesis guided by 2-D echocardiogra-phy: the method of choise for treatment of pericardial effusion. J Intern Med 2003; 253: 411-417.  4. Buchanan CL., Sullivan VV., Lampman R., Kulkarni MG. Pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drain-age: an effective therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 817-820.  5. Cummins RO. Textbook of Advanced Cardiac Life Support. Dallas: American Heart Association, 1987: 187-205.48 Aristotle University Medical Journal, Vol. 38, Issue 3, October 2011  6. Ball JB., Morrison WL. Cardiac tamponade. Postgrad Med J 1997; 73:141-145.  7. Callahan JA., Seward JB., Nishimura RA., Miller FA., Reeder GS., Shub C., et al. Two-dimensional echocar-diographically guided pericardiocentesis: experience in 117 consecutive patients. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 476-479.  8. Krikorian JG., Hancock EW. Pericardiocentesis. Am J Med 1978; 65: 808-814.  9. Tsang TS., Enriquez-Sarano M., Freeman WK., Barnes ME., Sinak LJ, Gersch BJ., et al. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided peri-cardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77: 429-436.10. McDonald JM., Meyers BF., Guthrie TJ., Battafarano RJ., Cooper JD., Patterson GA. Comparison of open subxiphoid pericardial drainage with percutaneous catheter drainage for symptomatic pericardial effu-sion. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 811-816.

Delayed diagnosis of right ventricle perforation after blind needle pericardiocentesis

https://ejournals.lib.auth.gr/aumj/article/download/4701/4802

Delayed diagnosis of right ventricle perforation after blind needle pericardiocentesis

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki: Open Journals / ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ