Airoldi, James, MD

Carrillo, Mary Anne, MD

Dapuzzo-Argiriou, Lisa M, MD

Galdi, Luisa, DO

Gonzalez-Rios, Angel, MD

Kissling, Jessika, MD

Kunselman, Allen R, MS

Legro, Richard S, MD

Maines, Jaimie, MD

Neubert, George, MD

Repke, John, MD

Rochon, Meredith, MD

Schnatz, Peter F, DO

Smulian, John C, MD, MPH

English

Lehigh Valley Health Network: LVHN Scholarly Works

Lehigh Valley Health NetworkLVHN Scholarly WorksDepartment of Obstetrics & GynecologyA Multi-Center, Two-Arm, Single-BlindRandomized Trial of Two Different IntravenousFluids During Labor (Poster).Lisa M. Dapuzzo-Argiriou MDLehigh Valley Health Network, lisa_m.dapuzzo@lvhn.orgJohn C. Smulian MD, MPHLehigh Valley Health Network, john.smulian@lvhn.orgMeredith Rochon MDLehigh Valley Health Network, Meredith_L.Rochon@lvhn.orgLuisa Galdi DOJessika Kissling MDSee next page for additional authorsFollow this and additional works at: https://scholarlyworks.lvhn.org/obstetrics-gynecologyPart of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Commons, and the Statistics and Probability CommonsThis Poster is brought to you for free and open access by LVHN Scholarly Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in LVHN Scholarly Works by anauthorized administrator. For more information, please contact LibraryServices@lvhn.org.Published In/Presented AtDapuzzo, J., Smulian, J., Rochon, M., Galdi, L., Kissling, J., Schnatz, P., Neubert, G., Gonzalez-Rios, A., Airoldi, J., Carrillo, M., Maines,J., Kunselman, A., Repke, J., & Legro, R. (2014, February 3-8). A multi-center, two-arm, single-blind randomized trial of IV fluids duringlabor. Poster presented at: The Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine 34th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LAAuthorsLisa M. Dapuzzo-Argiriou MD; John C. Smulian MD, MPH; Meredith Rochon MD; Luisa Galdi DO; JessikaKissling MD; Peter F. Schnatz DO; George Neubert MD; Angel Gonzalez-Rios MD; James Airoldi MD;Mary Anne Carrillo MD; Jaimie Maines MD; Allen R. Kunselman MS; John Repke MD; and Richard S.Legro MDThis poster is available at LVHN Scholarly Works: https://scholarlyworks.lvhn.org/obstetrics-gynecology/57 © 2014 Lehigh Valley Health NetworkObjective: To determine if the intrapartum use of a 5% glucose-containing intravenous solution decreases the chance of a cesarean delivery for women presenting in active labor.Methods: This was a multi-center, prospective, single (patient) blind, randomized study design implemented at 4 obstetric residency programs in Pennsylvania. Singleton, term, consenting women presenting in active spontaneous labor with a cervical dilation of <6cm were randomized to lactated Ringer’s with or without 5% glucose (LR versus D5LR) as their maintenance intravenous fluid. The primary outcome was the cesarean birth rate. Secondary outcomes included labor characteristics, as well as maternal or neonatal complications. Log-binomial regression was used to assess risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) after adjusting for participating center.Results: There were 309 women analyzed from 4 hospital sites. Demographic variables and admitting cervical dilation were similar among study groups. There was no significant difference in the cesarean delivery rate for the D5LR group (23/153 or 15.0%) versus the LR arm (18/156 or 11.5%), [RR (95%CI) of 1.32 (0.75, 2.35), P=0.34]. There were no differences in augmentation rates or intrapartum complications. The postpartum hemorrhage rate was 6.0% in the LR arm and 1.3% in the D5LR arm, P=0.05). There also was a marginally higher rate of neonatal hypoglycemia (glucose < 40 mg/dL) and 5 minute Apgar scores <7 in the D5LR group versus the LR group.Conclusions: The use of intravenous fluid containing 5% dextrose does not lower the chance of cesarean delivery for women admitted in active labor.Funding:Clinical Trials Registry number NCT01110005. This project is funded, in part, under a grant with the Pennsylvania Department of Health using Tobacco CURE Funds. The Department specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations or conclusions. This project described also was supported by the National Center for Research Resources, Grant UL1 RR033184 and is now at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant UL1 TR000127.  The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.Background:  •  Adequate caloric and fluid intake is important for muscle performance •  The uterus is a muscle undergoing work during labor •  Data suggest adding glucose to maintenance IV fluids in labor    –  May shorten labor duration in nulliparas   –  May reduce umbilical artery acidemia and hypercarbiaConclusions:  • Stratify patients into predetermined categories:    –  Vancomycin dosing and age range  •  Assess relationship between categories •  Evaluate attainment of vancomycin concentrations within each category  •  Patient-specific information to be collected will include:      –  Age [PMA and Postnatal age (PNA)]    –  Weight   –  Vancomycin dose and frequency   –  Days of vancomycin therapy   –  Measured vancomycin trough concentrations   –  Timing of vancomycin trough concentrations   –  Location of infection and organism   –  Documentation of organism eradication via cultures or clinical determination by the neonatologist   –  Daily serum creatinine from drug initiation to discontinuation   –  Presence of any co-administered nephrotoxic drugs  Abstract: Note: Study halted by DSMC due to overall lower than expected cesarean rates and revised sample size calculation showing unattainable target of 3374 subjects.Hypotheses:  •  IV hydration during labor with a glucose-containing fluid will lead to more efficient uterine contractility and will lead to a reduction of cesarean delivery and improved labor characteristics in women presenting in active labor. •  There is no increase in maternal or neonatal complications if glucose is used in IV fluids in laborMaterials and Methods:  •  Multi-center (4 regional OB/GYN residency programs) •  Prospective randomized single-blind •  Singleton in spontaneous labor with cervix <6cm dilation •  No glycemic dysregulation condition, steroids, prior cesarean, induction •  Randomized to maintenance IV fluid of either    –  Lactated Ringers (LR)   –  Lactated ringers with 5% glucose (D5LR) •  Any needed bolus of IVF was LR •  Randomization stratified by site •  Analyses   –  Risk Ratios (RR) and 95% CI   –  Log-binomial regression models   –  Parametric and non-parametric tests  •  Data Safety Monitoring CommitteeResults: Primary Outcomes:  •  No difference in cesarean delivery rate   –  D5LR-15% and LR-11.5%   –  RR (95% CI) of 1.32 (0.75, 2.35); P=0.34 •  No difference in cesarean delivery rate after adjusting for ketonuria   –  RR (95% CI) of 1.37 (0.78, 2.41); P=0.34 •  No difference in labor onset to delivery time        –  Cox proportional hazards (95% CI) of 1.00 (0.80, 1.26); P=0.99Conclusions: •  The addition of glucose to maintenance intrapartum IV fluids for women in spontaneous active labor at <6m:    –  Does not reduce the cesarean delivery rate   –  Does not shorten labor   –  Does not lower oxytocin augmentation rate   –  Does not change complication rates except marginally more cases of neonatal hypoglycemia and 5 minute Apgar scores <7, and marginally fewer postpartum hemorrhagesNote: Data reported as mean ± SD [n] for continuous variables and proportion (%) for categorical variables, with the exception of admission dilation (cm) which is reported as median (25th, 75th percentile) [n] due to non-normally distributed data.  P-values adjusted for recruitment site.Lactated RingersN=161D5 Lactated RingersN=157Subjects ExcludedConsent Not Complete (N=2)Ineligible (N=2)Withdrew Consent (N=1)Subjects ExcludedConsent Not Complete (N=3)Ineligible (N=1)AnalyzedN=156AnalyzedN=153RandomizedN=3181Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA; 2University of South Florida-Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL; 3The Reading Hospital, Reading, PA; 4St. Luke’s University Hospital, Bethlehem, PA;5Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PAA Multi-Center, Two-Arm, Single-Blind Randomized Trial of Two Different Intravenous Fluids During LaborLisa Dapuzzo, MD1, John C. Smulian, MD, MPH1,2, Meredith L. Rochon, MD1  Luisa Galdi, DO3, Jessika Kissling, MD3, Peter F. Schnatz, DO3, George Neubert, MD3,Angel Gonzalez Rios, MD4, James Airoldi, MD4, Mary Anne Carrillo, MD5, Jaimie Maines, MD5, Allen R. Kunselman, MS5, John Repke, MD5, Richard S. Legro, MD5Figure 1.Randomization FlowchartTable 1: Demographic and labor characteristics compared   between treatment arms of LR and D5LR solution.   LR(N=156)D5LR(N=153)p-valueMaternal age (years) 26.8 ± 4.9 [156] 26.7 ± 4.9 [153] 0.87 Nulliparity 86/156 (55.1%) 83/151 (55.0%) 0.99Hispanic 12/156 (7.7%) 21/152 (13.8%) 0.09Race 0.19     Caucasian 127/156 (81.4%) 129/151 (85.4%)     African American 11/156 (7.1%) 4/151 (2.7%)     Other 18/156 (11.5%) 18/151 (11.9%)Private Insurance 116/153 (75.8%) 111/152 (73.0%) 0.57> 12th Grade Education 93/136 (68.4%) 89/133 (66.9%) 0.84Tobacco use 17/153 (11.1%) 15/152 (9.9%) 0.72Alcohol use 4/153 (2.6%) 9/145 (6.2%) 0.13Initial BMI (kg/m2) 26.5 ± 5.8 [148] 26.1 ± 6.5 [147] 0.63Initial weight (kg) 69.8 ± 15.1 [152] 69.5 ± 17.5 [148] 0.87Weight gain (kg) 12.0 ± 6.6 [150] 13.5 ± 9.9 [148] 0.14Hypertensive disorders 2/156 (1.3%) 0/153 (0%) 0.17Ketonuria on admission 15/106 (14.2%) 8/103 (7.8%) 0.23Admission dilation (cm) 4.0 (3.0, 4.0) [156] 4.0 (3.0, 4.0) [152] 0.92Note: Data reported as mean ± SD [n] for continuous variables and proportion (%) for categorical variables, time to delivery (hours) is reported as median (25th, 75th percentile) [n].  P-values adjusted for recruitment site (except for chorioamnionitis, meconium, shoulder dystocia, postpartum hemorrhage, and base deficit).  Table 2: Obstetric outcomes compared between treatment arms of LR                      and D5LR solution.  LR(N=156)D5LR(N=153)Risk Ratio(95% CI)p-valueCesarean delivery 18/156 (11.5%) 23/153 (15.0%) 1.3 (0.7, 2.3) 0.87 Cesarean delivery (adjusted for ketonuria)   1.4 (0.8, 2.4) 0.27Time to delivery (hours) 12.1 (8.4, 18.0) [150] 12.8 (7.6, 18.3) [150] 0.69Augmentation 88/156 (56.4%) 92/153 (60.1%) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) 0.40Any Operative Delivery (C/S, Forceps, Vacuum) 25/156 (16.0%) 31/153 (20.3%) 1.3 (0.8, 2.1) 0.31Intrapartum fluids (ml)       Randomized fluid 2058 ± 1176 [109] 1472 ± 998 [115] <0.01    Total fluids 2086 ± 1263 [110] 2043 ± 1378 [115] 0.89Meconium 5/152 (3.3%) 4/150 (2.7%) 0.8 (0.2, 3.0) 0.75Chorioamnionitis 6/152 (3.9%) 5/150 (3.3%) 0.8 (0.3, 2.7) 0.78Postpartum hemorrhage 9/151 (6.0%) 2/149 (1.3%) 0.2 (0.0, 1.0) 0.05Shoulder dystocia 5/152 (3.3%) 5/150 (3.3%) 1.0 (0.3, 3.4) 0.98Umb artery gases        pH 7.24 ± 0.07 [48] 7.22 ± 0.08 [59] 0.67    pH  ≤7.15 7/48 (14.6%) 12/59 (20.3%) 1.0 (0.5, 2.3) 0.96    UA pCO2 54.8 ± 11.1 [49] 55.0 ± 11.4 [59] 0.55    Base deficit >12 3/48 (6.3%) 6/58 (10.3%) 1.7 (0.4, 6.3) 0.46Note: Data reported as mean ± SD [n] for normally distributed continuous variables, median (25th, 75th percentile) [n] for non-normally distributed variables or ordinal variables, and proportion (%) for binary variables.  P-values adjusted for recruitment site.Table 3: Neonatal outcomes compared between treatment       arms of lactated Ringer’s (LR) solution and D5 lactated Ringer’s     (D5LR) solution.   LR(N=156)D5LR(N=153)p-valueBirth weight (g) 3428 ± 404 [156] 3408 ± 417 [153] 0.64 Male sex 83/156 (53.2%) 83/153 (54.3%) 0.88Apgar at 5min 9.0 (9.0, 9.0) [155] 9.0 (9.0, 9.0) [153] 0.06Apgar at 5min, <7 0/155 (0.0%) 4/153 (2.6%) 0.06Respiratory difficulty 4/153 (2.6%) 6/150 (4.0%) 0.52Suspected sepsis 3/151 (2.0%) 2/144 (1.4%) 0.69Neonatal hypoglycemia 7/50 (14.0%) 18/55 (32.7%) 0.05Hyperbilirubinemia with phototherapy 3/154 (1.9%) 1/146 (0.7%) 0.36NICU/special nursery admission 19/156 (12.2%) 17/153 (11.1%) 0.79LATCH Scores 8.0 (7.0, 9.0) [90] 8.0 (7.0, 9.0) [87] 0.15

A Multi-Center, Two-Arm, Single-Blind Randomized Trial of Two Different Intravenous Fluids During Labor (Poster).

https://scholarlyworks.lvhn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=obstetrics-gynecology

A Multi-Center, Two-Arm, Single-Blind Randomized Trial of Two Different Intravenous Fluids During Labor (Poster).

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Lehigh Valley Health Network: LVHN Scholarly Works