Alcântara, João

Caminada, Martinus Wigbertus Antonius

Dvořák, Wolfgang

Sá, Samy

English

In the current paper, we re-examine the connection between abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation. Although these are often claimed to be equivalent, we observe that there exist well-studied admissibility-based semantics (semi-stable and eager) under which equivalence does not hold

Caminada, M (author)

Sa, S. (author)

Alcantara, J. (author)

Dvorak, W. (author)

TU Delft Repository

On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation

A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artiﬁcial Intellligence,

A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.

Abstract argumentation systems.

An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.

An introductionto argumentationsemantics.

Anabstract,argumentation-theoreticapproach to default reasoning.

Argument-based logic programming.

Argumentation semantics for defeasible logic.

Assumption-based argumentation.

Comparing two unique extension semantics for formal argumentation: ideal and eager.

Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming.

Computing ideal sceptical argumentation.

Dvoˇ r´ ak. On the difference between assumption-based argumentation and abstract argumentation.

On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.

Parametric properties of ideal semantics.

Reasoning on the web with assumption-based argumentation.

Semi-stable semantics.

Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages.

On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

TU Delft Repository