Enriching interpersonal relations: two disabled architects’ aesthetic appreciation and conception of built space

Abstract

Some notions of aesthetics in architecture focus on the individual-environment relation rather than on the relations between individuals occurring within space and the role of architecture therein. Other notions start to question these individual perspectives by looking into aesthetic sensibilities oriented towards creating environments that enrich interpersonal relations. In this context, our study examines two architects’ aesthetic appreciation and production of built space, and how it relates to their perspective of being disabled. We report on the study of two cases: the Sorenson Language and Communication Center (SLCC) and Urban Chandelier, in tandem with their architects’ experiences of being disabled. Along with analyzing design media, in-depth interviews with deaf architect George Balsley and with vision impaired architect William Feuerman gave insight into how the aesthetics of their conceived spaces facilitate, enhance or intensify socio-affective relationships with(in) the environment and/or between bodies. In relation to George’s deaf ways of being, the SLCC nuances spatial boundaries by attending to spatial communication pathways and degrees of visual privacy relevant for sign language. For its part, Urban Chandelier aims to enhance social (inter)action and facilitate appropriation of urban space. Conceptually, the chandelier’s effect relates to William’s own experiences: his vision impairment altered his visual attention, granting him with a newfound awareness of his own body, his surroundings, and a more socially-oriented understanding of aesthetics. In light of these findings, our study supports the claim that aesthetic enjoyment may be taken in (inter)active and socio-affective relationships occurring within, and supported by, the built space.status: publishe