Energy efficiency comparison between 2.1 GHz and 28 GHz based communication networks

Abstract

Mobile communications have revolutionized the way we communicate around the globe, making communication easier, faster and cheaper. In the first three generations of mobile networks, the primary focus was on voice calls, and as such, the traffic on the networks was not as heavy as it currently is. Towards the fourth generation however, there was an explosive increase in mobile data traffic, driven in part by the heavy use of smart phones, tablets and cloud services, that is in turn increasing heavy energy consumption by the mobile networks to meet increased demand. Addition of power conditioning equipment adds on to the overall energy consumption of the base stations, necessitating deployment of energy efficient solutions to deal with the impacts and costs of heavy energy consumption. This thesis investigates the energy efficiency performance of mobile networks in various scenarios in a dense urban environment. Consideration is given to the future deployment of 5G networks, and simulations are carried out at 2.1 GHz and 28 GHz frequencies with a channel bandwidth of 20 MHz in the 2.1 GHz simulation and 20 MHz in 28 GHz scenario. The channel bandwidth of the 28 GHz system is then increased ten-fold and another system performance evaluation is then done. Parameters used for evaluating the system performance include the received signal strength, signal-to-interference-plus-noise-ratio, spectral efficiency and power efficiency are also considered. The results suggest that deployment of networks using mmWave frequencies with the same parameters as the 2.1 GHz does not improve the overall performance of the system but improves the throughput when a bandwidth of 200 MHz band is allocated. The use of antenna masking with down tilting improves the gains of the system in all three systems. The conclusion drawn is that if all factors are the same, mmWave systems can be installed in the same site locations as 2.1 GHz systems. However, to achieve better performance, some significant modifications would need to be considered, like the use of antenna arrays and beam steering techniques. This simulation has considered outdoor users only, with indoor users eliminated. The parameters in a real network deployment might differ and the results could change, which in turn could change the performance of the system

    Similar works