Floridi, Luciano

Ganascia, Jean-Gabriel

Pagallo, Ugo

Verbeek, Peter-Paul

Vermaas, Pieter

Verbeek, Peter P.C.C.

University of Twente Research Information

                    ABSTRACTS              4 - 6 July 2013 420  Panel B Governance and the technologies of information  Luciano FLORIDI University of Hertfordshire, UK luciano.floridi@philosophy.ox.ac.uk  Jean--‐Gabriel GANASCIA University Pierre and Marie Curie, France  Ugo PAGALLO Faculty of Law University of Turin, Italy  Peter--‐Paul VERBEEK Department of Philosophy University of Twente, The Netherlands p.p.c.c.verbeek@utwente.nl  Pieter  VERMAAS Department of Philosophy Delf University of Technology, The Netherlands p.e.vermaas@tudelft.nl    The post--‐Westphalian Nation State developed by becoming more and more an Information Society. However, in so doing, it progressively made itself less and less the main information agent, because what also made the Nation State possible and then predominant, as  a  historical  driving  force  in human politics , namely Information and Communication technologies (ICTs), is also  what  is  now making it less central, in the social, political and economic life across the world.  ICTs fluidify the topology of politics. They do not merely enable but actually promote (through management and empowerment) the agile, temporary and timely aggregation, disaggregation and re--‐aggregation of distributed groups around shared interests across old, rigid boundaries represented by social classes, political parties, ethnicity, language barriers, physical barriers, and so forth.  This is generating a new tension between the Nation State, still understood as a major organisational institution, yet no longer monolithic but increasingly morphing into a multiagent system itself, and a variety of equally powerful, indeed sometimes even more politically influential and powerful, non-‐‐ Statal organisations. Geo--‐politics is now global and increasingly nonterritorial, but the Nation State still defines its identity and political legitimacy in terms of a sovereign territorial unit, as a Country.  The panel will discuss how new informational multiagent systems (MAS) be designed in such a way as to take full advantage of the socio--‐political progress made so far, while being able to deal successfully with the new global challenges (from the environment to the financial markets) that are undermining the legacy of that very progress. It is not an easy task. But the hope is that the panel will 420  Panel B   contribute  to  identify  solutions,  resolve  problems,  and  anticipate  difficulties  in  this  vital  area  of human  interactions.  

English

Governance and the technologies of information

NARCIS 

Governance and the technologies of information

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Twente Research Information

NARCIS