Davies, Neil M.

Itani, Taha

Jones, Tim

Martin, Richard M.

Munafò, Marcus R.

Rai, Dheeraj

Taylor, Amy E.

Taylor, Gemma M. J.

Thomas, Kyla H.

English

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of varenicline versus NRT for smoking cessation in people with neurodevelopmental disorders, compared to those without, at up to four years after exposure. We analysed electronic medical records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink using three different statistical approaches: multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and instrumental variable analysis. Exposure was prescription of varenicline versus NRT and the primary outcome was smoking cessation at 2- years. We included 235,314 people aged 18 and above with eligible smoking cessation prescriptions in the effectiveness analysis. Smokers with neurodevelopmental disorders were 48% less likely (95% confidence interval: 42%,54%) to be prescribed varenicline than NRT,compared to smokers without neurodevelopmental disorders. At 2-year follow-up, smokers with neurodevelopmental disorders prescribed varenicline were 38% more likely to quit smoking (95% confidence interval: 6%,78%). Similar results were obtained using PSM and instrumental variable analyses. There was little evidence showing that varenicline increased the likelihood of mental health related adverse events in people with neurodevelopmental disorders. Varenicline is less likely to be prescribed to people with neurodevelopmental disorders despite results suggesting it is more effective than NRT and little evidence of increased likelihood of mental health related adverse events

Explore Bristol Research

Long-term effectiveness and safety of varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy in people with neurodevelopmental disorders:A prospective cohort study

https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/219426811/s41598_019_54727_5.pdf

Long-term effectiveness and safety of varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy in people with neurodevelopmental disorders:A prospective cohort study

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Explore Bristol Research