Chromogranin A (CgA) is gaining acceptance as a serum marker of
neuroendocrine tumors. Its specificity in differentiating between
neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine tumors, its sensitivity to detect
small tumors, and its clinical value, compared with other neuroendocrine
markers, have not clearly been defined, however. The objectives of this
study were to evaluate the clinical usefulness of CgA as neuroendocrine
serum marker. Serum levels of CgA, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and the
alpha-subunit of glycoprotein hormones (alpha-SU) were determined in 211
patients with neuroendocrine tumors and 180 control subjects with
nonendocrine tumors. The concentrations of CgA, NSE, and alpha-SU were
elevated in 50%, 43%, and 24% of patients with neuroendocrine tumors,
respectively. Serum CgA was most frequently increased in subjects with
gastrinomas (100%), pheochromocytomas (89%), carcinoid tumors (80%),
nonfunctioning tumors of the endocrine pancreas (69%), and medullary
thyroid carcinomas (50%). The highest levels were observed in subjects
with carcinoid tumors. NSE was most frequently elevated in patients with
small cell lung carcinoma (74%), and alpha-SU was most frequently elevated
in patients with carcinoid tumors (39%). Most subjects with elevated
alpha-SU levels also had elevated CgA concentrations. A significant
positive relationship was demonstrated between the tumor load and serum
CgA levels (P < 0.01, by chi 2 test). Elevated concentrations of CgA, NSE,
and alpha-SU were present in, respectively, 7%, 35%, and 15% of control
subjects. Markedly elevated serum levels of CgA, exceeding 300
micrograms/L, were observed in only 2% of control patients (n = 3)
compared to 40% of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (n = 76). We
conclude that CgA is the best general neuroendocrine serum marker
available. It has the highest specificity for the detection of
neuroendocrine tumors compared to the other neuroendocrine markers, NSE
and alpha-SU. Elevated levels are strongly correlated with tumor volume;
therefore, small tumors may go undetected. Although its specificity cannot
compete with that of the specific hormonal secretion products of most
neuroendocrine tumors, it can have useful clinical applications in
subjects with neuroendocrine tumors for whom either no marker is available
or the marker is inconvenient for routine clinical use