As part of its program of 'Excellence in Research for Australia' (ERA), the
Australian Research Council ranked journals into four categories (A*, A, B, C)
in preparation for their performance evaluation of Australian universities. The
ranking is important because it likely to have a major impact on publication
choices and research dissemination in Australia. The ranking is problematic
because it is evident that some disciplines have been treated very differently
than others. This paper reveals weaknesses in the ERA journal ranking and
highlights the poor correlation between ERA rankings and other acknowledged
metrics of journal standing. It highlights the need for a reasonable
representation of journals ranked as A* in each scientific discipline.Comment: 14 pages, 4 figures, 7 table