Insuring the integrity and security of hot mix asphalt (HMA) samples is critical to assuring the quality of the installed product and complying with
Federal requirements. Samples of HMA are often taken at the plant with limited state supervision. Further, samples are taken from a truck where
obtaining a representative sample can be difficult. The concept of moving the sample location to the job site offers the potential to address the
weaknesses cited above. However, there are a number of different approaches, each with advantages and disadvantages. The objective of the proposed
research project was to produce a review of successful methods and practices currently used to sample HMA during production and installation. This
included visiting other states and providing detailed documentation of the visits. While achieving this objective, sufficient data were collected to allow
IDOT’s personnel to draw a final recommendation for the optimum technique to be adopted for HMA sampling in future projects. During the course of this
project, sampling practices in six highway agencies were evaluated (Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, Florida, and Ministry of Transportation of Ontario).
Four of these agencies specify roadway sampling, while one agency is experimenting with a new generation of mechanical sampling device and another
agency samples directly from a Material Transfer Device (MTD). During the course of this project, areas of improvement in the current Illinois QC/QA
program were also identified.
In general, sampling behind the paver is being conducted by many states without much difficulty. Based on the site visits conducted in this research,
the TRP group determined that the roadway sampling procedure adopted by Michigan DOT is the most appropriate for possible implementation in Illinois.
In addition to this sampling technique, sealed bags adopted by Iowa DOT may be used, if necessary, to safely transport samples from the field to lab.
Results of this research project also indicated that all visited states have a much higher sampling/testing frequency than Illinois and have successfully
implemented an incentive/disincentive specification system. In addition, all visited states comply with the FHWA Technical Advisory (TA) or are in the
process of making changes to comply with the TA.
Based on these findings, the TRP has determined that the current Illinois QC/QA program is in need of several modifications to ensure successful
implementation of roadway sampling, to comply with the TA, and to encourage high-quality construction of HMA. While changing sample location would
improve sample security, it would not address shortcomings of the existing QC/QA program. In conjunction with implementation of roadway sampling, it is
recommended to base sampling on tons instead of time, that IDOT personnel determine random sampling locations, witness samples taken, and take
immediate possession of samples; adopt incentive and disincentive pay; and accept density based on field cores. It is also recommended that the formed
TRP group continue effort in revising the QC/QA program to gain compliance with the TA and to introduce changes deemed necessary from our field visits.Illinois Department of Transportationpublished or submitted for publicationnot peer reviewe
