CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Positive and negative evaluation of caregiving among three different types of informal care relationships
Authors
A Baronet
A Boer De
+34 more
Alice de Boer
BJ Kramer
BJ Kramer
BJ Kramer
BJ Tarlow
BW Winslow
C Lyonette
CA Cohen
CL Himes
CR Goodman
E Bacon
E Iecovich
J Lopez
JC Barker
Jurjen Iedema
LI Pearlin
M Hilgeman
M Pinquart
M Pinquart
M Raschick
Marjolein I. Broese van Groenou
ME Szinovacz
ME Yates
MP Lawton
MY Savundranayagam
NF Marks
NL Chapell
R Schulz
S Egging
S Katz
SH Zarit
SM Robertson
SR Rapp
Y Shirai
Publication date
1 January 2013
Publisher
Doi
Abstract
Based on the caregiver stress model, we examined how care demands, caregiver motivation, coping style and external support are associated with positive evaluation and caregiver burden among spousal, adult child and other types of care relations. Data from a sample of Dutch informal caregivers of 1,685 older persons (55 and older) were analyzed employing multivariate linear regression analyses for each of the care relationship types. Spouses (N = 206) report high positive evaluation and high burden, adult children (N = 1,093) report low positive evaluation, and other caregivers (N = 386) report high positive evaluation and a low burden. Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that motives and external support were important for positive evaluation but the impact varied among types of caregivers, whereas care demands and not asking for help were associated with burden for all types. Only among 'other' caregiver relationships, positive evaluation was negatively associated with burden. It is concluded that results confirm the dual nature of caregiving among spouses and children. The care context and motivation of the different types of caregivers explain their differences in care evaluation. Various interventions for types of caregivers are discussed. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10433-013-...
Last time updated on 10/12/2019
NARCIS
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 14/10/2017
VU Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research.vu.nl:publication...
Last time updated on 18/04/2020
DSpace at VU
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:dare.ubvu.vu.nl:1871/49683
Last time updated on 21/12/2013