Since its rise at the beginning of the twentieth century, comparative legal research
has gained an influential place in legal research concerning national legal systems.
Comparative legal methodology is used to acquire insight into foreign legal systems,
to find solutions for problems of a specific legal system, or to promote the unifi cation
of law between national legal systems. Its methods consist of a comparison of
different legal systems or legal traditions (external comparison), or of fields of
law within national legal systems (internal comparison). With the proliferation
of regulatory regimes at the international level (e.g. in the context of the United
Nations or the WTO), comparative legal research has expanded its focus to include
international law. Consensus, however, has not been reached on the most suitable
way of applying comparative law methods to the global context. Can the concepts
and methods developed to conduct comparative legal research of national legal
systems be transposed to study the international legal system?
In this issue of Erasmus Law Review, a number of scholars with different legal backgrounds reflect on these questions