Using a geology-based probabilistic methodology, the USGS estimated the occurrence 

of undiscovered oil and gas in 33 geologic provinces thought to be prospective for petroleum. The sum of the mean estimates for each province indicates that 90 billion barrels of oil, 1,669 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and 44 billion barrels of natural gas liquids may remain to be found in the Arctic, of which approximately 

84 percent is expected to occur in offshore areas

Stauffer, Peter

Arctic Portal Library

U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological SurveyUSGS Fact Sheet 2008-30492008Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: Estimates of  Undiscovered Oil and Gas North of the Arctic CircleThe U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has completed an assessment ofundiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in all areas north of the Arctic Circle. Using a geology-based probabilistic methodology, the USGS estimated the occurrence of undiscovered oil and gas in 33 geologic provinces thought to be prospective for petroleum. The sum of the mean estimates for each province indicates that 90 billion barrels of oil, 1,669 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and 44 billion barrels of natural gas liquids may remain to be found in the Arctic, of which approximately 84 percent is expected to occur in offshore areas. Introduction In May 2008 a team of U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists completed an ap-praisal of possible future additions to world oil and gas reserves from new field dis-coveries in the Arctic. This Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal (CARA) evaluated the petroleum potential of all areas north of the Arctic Circle (66.56° north latitude); quantitative assessments were conducted in those geologic areas considered to have at least a 10-percent chance of one or more significant oil or gas accumulations. For the purposes of the study, a significant accu-mulation contains recoverable volumes of at least 50 million barrels of oil and/or oil-equivalent natural gas. The study included only those resources believed to be recov-erable using existing technology, but with the important assumptions for offshore areas that the resources would be recover-able even in the presence of permanent sea ice and oceanic water depth. No economic considerations are included in these initial estimates; results are presented without reference to costs of exploration and devel-opment, which will be important in many of the assessed areas. So-called nonconventional resources, such as coal bed methane, gas hy-drate, oil shale, and tar sand, were explicitly excluded from the study. Full details of the CARA study will be published later.A number of onshore areas in Canada, Rus-sia, and Alaska already have been explored for petroleum, resulting in the discovery of more than 400 oil and gas fields north of the Arctic Circle. These fields account for ap-proximately 240 billion barrels (BBOE) of oil and oil-equivalent natural gas, which is almost 10 percent of the world’s known con-ventional petroleum resources (cumulative production and remaining proved reserves). Nevertheless, most of the Arctic, especially offshore, is essentially unexplored with respect to petroleum. The Arctic Circle encompasses about 6 percent of the Earth’s surface, an area of more than 21 million km2 (8.2 million mi2), of which almost 8 million km2 (3.1 million mi2) is onshore and more than 7 million km2 (2.7 million mi2) is on continental shelves under less than 500 m of water. The extensive Arctic continental shelves may constitute the geographically largest unexplored prospective area for petroleum remaining on Earth. MethodologyA newly compiled map of Arctic sedimen-tary basins (Arthur Grantz and others, un-published work) was used to define geologic provinces, each containing more than 3 km of sedimentary strata. Assessment units (AUs)—mappable volumes of rock with common geologic traits—were identified within each province and quantitatively assessed for  petroleum potential. Because of the sparse seismic and drilling data in much of the  Arctic, the usual tools and techniques used in USGS resource assessments, such as discov-ery process modeling, prospect delineation, and deposit simulation, were not generally applicable. Therefore, the CARA relied on a probabilistic methodology of geological analysis and analog modeling. A world  analog database (Charpentier and others, 2008) was developed using the AUs defined in the USGS World Petroleum Assessment 2000 (USGS World Assessment Team, 2000). Overturned sedimentary rocks of the Lisburne Group under a midnight rainbow near Galbraith Lake, Alaska, summer 2001. USGS photo by David Houseknecht. [Continued on back page]PETROLEUM POTENTIAL OF ASSESSMENT UNITS AND PROVINCES IN THE CIRCUM-ARCTICIn the Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal (CARA), 33 provinces were examined, of which 25 were judged to have a 10-percent or great-er probability of at least one significant undiscovered petroleum accumulation in any constituent assessment unit (AU) and were there-fore quantitatively assessed. Shown in these three maps are the relative probabilities for all assessment units assessed and the estimated relative potentials for undiscovered oil and gas in the assessed provinces.AACBWSBFSAMLMTUN SBEBBEBBPWGECYKNMLSSEGRLVTPBNKBHBMZBNWCYFLANGSVLKESSNCWFJMMZBNZAANWLSLSFigure 1. Assessment units (AUs) in the Circum-Arctic  Resource  Appraisal (CARA) color-coded by assessed  probability of the presence of at least one undiscovered oil and/or gas field with recoverable  resources greater than 50 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE). Probabilities for AUs are based on the entire area of the AU, including any parts south of the Arctic Circle.PROBABILITY  (percent) 10050–10030–5010–30<10Area of low petroleum potential90º E90º E 90º W0 º180º   A R C T I C    C I R C L ECBAANCWFWSBFSAMLMEBTUN SBEBBBPWGECYKNMLSSEGRLVTPBNKBHBMZBNWCYFLANGSVLKESSJMMZBNZAANWLSLSAACBWSBFSAMLMTUN SBEBBEBBPWGECYKNMLSSEGRLVTPBNKBHBMZBNWCYFLANGSVLKESSNCWFJMMZBNZAANWLSLSFigure 3.  Provinces in the Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal (CARA) color-cod-ed for mean estimated undiscovered oil in oil fields. Only areas north of the Arctic Circle are included in the estimates. Province labels are the same as in table 1.UNDISCOVERED OIL(billion barrels)>101-10<1Area not quantitatively assessedArea of low petroleum potentialFigure 2. Provinces in the Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal (CARA) color-coded for mean estimated undiscovered gas. Only areas north of the Arctic Circle are included in the estimates. Province labels are the same as in table 1.UNDISCOVERED GAS(trillion cubic feet)>1006–100<6Area not quantitatively assessedArea of low petroleum potential0 º90º W180º90º E90º W0 º180º   A R C T I C    C I R C L E   A R C T I C    C I R C L EPrinted on recycled paperThe database includes areas that account for more than 95 percent of the world’s known oil and gas resources outside the United States.For each assessment unit, the CARA team assessed the probability (AU probability) that a significant oil or gas accumulation was pres-ent. This evaluation of AU probability was based on three geologic elements: (1) charge (including source rocks and thermal maturi-ty), (2) rocks (including reservoirs, traps, and seals), and (3) timing (including the relative ages of migration and trap formation, as well as preservation). Each assessment unit was ranked according to its AU probability; those AUs judged to have less than a 10-percent probability of a significant accumulation were not quantitatively assessed.In addition to the AU probability, the number of accumulations, the size-frequency distribution of accumulations, and the relative likelihood of oil versus gas were assessed for each AU and combined by means of a Monte Carlo simulation. The probabilistic results re-flect the wide range of uncertainty inherent in frontier geological provinces such as those of the Arctic. Results—Resource SummaryWithin the area of the CARA, 25 provinc-es were quantitatively assessed; 8 provinces were judged to have less than a 10-percent probability of at least one significant accu-mulation in any AU and were, therefore, not assessed. Results of individual AU assess-ments are not reported here, but the AUs are shown as mapped areas on figure 1, where they are color-coded for the probability of at least one undiscovered accumulation of minimum size. The provinces are listed in table 1, in ranked order of total mean esti-mated oil-equivalent volumes of undiscov-ered oil, gas, and natural gas liquids (NGL). The provinces are shown in figures 2 and 3, where they have been color-coded with re-spect to fully risked (including AU probabili-ties) potential for gas and oil, respectively.More than 70 percent of the mean undis-covered oil resources is estimated to occur in five provinces: Arctic Alaska, Amerasia Ba-sin, East Greenland Rift Basins, East Barents Basins, and West Greenland–East Canada. More than 70 percent of the undiscovered natural gas is estimated to occur in three prov-inces, the West Siberian Basin, the East Bar-ents Basins, and Arctic Alaska. It is further estimated that approximately 84 percent of the undiscovered oil and gas occurs offshore. The total mean undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources of the Arctic are estimated to be approximately 90 billion barrels of oil, 1,669 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and 44 billion barrels of natural gas liquids. ReferencesCharpentier, R.R., Klett, T.R., and Attanasi, E.D., 2008, Database for assessment unit-scale ana-logs (exclusive of the United States): U.S. Geo-logical Survey Open-File Report 2007-1404  [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1404/]. USGS World Assessment Team, 2000, U.S. Geo-logical Survey World Petroleum Assessment 2000-Description and Results: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series – DDS60  [http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-060/].Circum-Arctic Resource  Appraisal Assessment Team  (in alphabetical order):  Kenneth J. Bird, Ronald R. Charpentier,  Donald L. Gautier (CARA Project Chief),  David W. Houseknecht, Timothy R. Klett,  Janet K. Pitman, Thomas E. Moore,  Christopher J. Schenk, Marilyn E. Tennyson,  and Craig J. WandreyEdited by Peter H. StaufferGraphic design by Judy Weathers and Zenon Valin[Continued from front page]For further information contact:Donald L. Gautier:  gautier@usgs.gov U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 969345 Middlefield RoadMenlo Park, CA 94025This fact sheet and any updates to it are available online at:http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/Table 1. Summary of Results of the Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal[MMBO, million barrels of oil; BCFG, billion cubic feet of natural gas; MMBNGL, million barrels of natural gas liquids; NQA, not quantitatively assessed. Results shown are fully risked mean estimates. For gas accumulations, all liquids are included as NGL (natural gas liquids). Provinces are listed in ranked order of total barrels of oil and oil-equivalent natural gas (BOE).]Province CodeProvince Oil  (MMBO)Total Gas  (BCFG)NGL  (MMBNGL)BOE  (MMBOE)WSB West Siberian Basin 3,659.88 651,498.56 20,328.69 132,571.66AA Arctic Alaska 29,960.94 221,397.60 5,904.97 72,765.52EBB East Barents Basin 7,406.49 317,557.97 1,422.28 61,755.10EGR East Greenland Rift Basins 8,902.13 86,180.06 8,121.57 31,387.04YK Yenisey-Khatanga Basin 5,583.74 99,964.26 2,675.15 24,919.61AM Amerasia Basin 9,723.58 56,891.21 541.69 19,747.14WGEC West Greenland-East Canada 7,274.40 51,818.16 1,152.59 17,063.35LSS Laptev Sea Shelf 3,115.57 32,562.84 867.16 9,409.87NM Norwegian Margin 1,437.29 32,281.01 504.73 7,322.19BP Barents Platform 2,055.51 26,218.67 278.71 6,704.00EB Eurasia Basin 1,342.15 19,475.43 520.26 5,108.31NKB North Kara Basins and Platforms 1,807.26 14,973.58 390.22 4,693.07TPB Timan-Pechora Basin 1,667.21 9,062.59 202.80 3,380.44NGS North Greenland Sheared Margin 1,349.80 10,207.24 273.09 3,324.09LM Lomonosov-Makarov 1,106.78 7,156.25 191.55 2,491.04SB Sverdrup Basin 851.11 8,596.36 191.20 2,475.04LA Lena-Anabar Basin 1,912.89 2,106.75 56.41 2,320.43NCWF North Chukchi-Wrangel Foreland Basin85.99 6,065.76 106.57 1,203.52VLK Vilkitskii Basin 98.03 5,741.87 101.63 1,156.63NWLS Northwest Laptev Sea Shelf 172.24 4,488.12 119.63 1,039.90LV Lena-Vilyui Basin 376.86 1,335.20 35.66 635.06ZB Zyryanka Basin 47.82 1,505.99 40.14 338.95ESS East Siberian Sea Basin 19.73 618.83 10.91 133.78HB Hope Basin 2.47 648.17 11.37 121.87NWC Northwest Canada Interior Basins 23.34 305.34 15.24 89.47MZB Mezen’ Basin NQA NQA NQA NQANZAA Novaya Zemlya Basins and Admiralty ArchNQA NQA NQA NQATUN Tunguska Basin NQA NQA NQA NQACB Chuckhi Borderland NQA NQA NQA NQAYF Yukon Flats (part of Central Alaska Province)NQA NQA NQA NQALS Long Strait NQA NQA NQA NQAJMM Jan Mayen Microcontinent NQA NQA NQA NQAFS Franklinian Shelf NQA NQA NQA NQATotal 89,983.21 1,668,657.84 44,064.24 412,157.09

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: Estimates of Undiscovered Oil and Gas North of the Arctic Circle

http://library.arcticportal.org/1554/1/usgs.pdf

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: Estimates of Undiscovered Oil and Gas North of the Arctic Circle

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Arctic Portal Library