Abstract This article examines the effect that different
specifications of the time trade-off (TTO) valuation task
may have on values for EQ-5D-5L health states. The new
variants of the TTO, namely lead-time TTO and lag-time
TTO, along with the classic approach to TTO were compared
using two durations for the health states (15 and
20 years). The study tested whether these methods yield
comparable health-state values. TTO tasks were administered
online. It was found that lag-time TTO produced
lower values than lead-time TTO and that the difference
was larger in the longer time frame. Classic TTO values
most resembled those of the lag-time TTO in a 20-year
time frame in terms of mean absolute difference. The relative
importance of different domains of health was systematically
affected by the duration of the health state. In
the tasks with a 10-year health-state duration, anxiety/
depression had the largest negative impact on health-state
values; in the tasks with a 5-year duration, the pain/discomfort
domain had the largest negative impact