PSU’s ninth president, Dr. Rahmat Shoureshi (pronounced Shoe-re-she) is an experienced administrator and innovative academic who considers his work with students his greatest accomplishment. Shoureshi is a mechanical engineer who earned a master’s degree and a doctorate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Shoureshi says PSU’s commitment to diversity, civic engagement and innovation persuaded him to join the university

JANG Se-Young

JEON Byong-Tae

KAWAMURA Kensuke

KIM Sang-Woo

MOON Sang-Ho

OGURA Shin-ichiro

SEONG Hye-Jin

YAYOTA Masato

YUN Yeong-Sik

English

Martin, Sheila

Morehead, Elizabeth

PDXScholar (Portland State University)

Portland State UniversityPDXScholarMetroscape Institute of Portland Metropolitan StudiesWinter 2018Engineering PSU's Future: An Interview with Dr. RahmatShoureshiSheila MartinPortland State UniversityElizabeth MoreheadPortland State UniversityLet us know how access to this document benefits you.Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/metroscapePart of the Higher Education Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning CommonsThis Interview is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Metroscape by an authorized administrator ofPDXScholar. For more information, please contact pdxscholar@pdx.edu.Recommended CitationMartin, Sheila and Morehead, Elizabeth, "Engineering PSU's Future: An Interview with Dr. Rahmat Shoureshi" (2018). Metroscape.131.https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/metroscape/131Page 20MetroscapeDr. Morehead: Your career has taken you from Iran to Boston to Colorado, Michigan, and New York. What were your motivations for com-ing to Portland and PSU at this point in your career?President Shoureshi: That PSU and Portland are so intertwined is really attractive, because when you're an urban university that means this city becomes a live lab for your faculty and the students. It provides the opportunity so that the students not only understand the education in the classroom, they also have the ability to experiment locally on some of  the issues and topics that they are learning. The other reason is that, when you talk to peo-ple, everybody says this is a great place to move to. When I would ask why, there were basically three words: it’s innovative, creative, and entre-preneurial. I looked at PSU and I looked at what the place has, and it's a university that has all of  the ingredients to be really a model global urban university. And having those ingredients PSU’s ninth president, Dr. Rahmat Shoureshi (pronounced Shoe-re-she) is an expe-rienced administrator and innovative academic who considers his work with students his greatest accomplishment. Shoureshi is a mechanical engineer who earned a master’s degree and a doctorate from the Massachusetts Institute of  Technology. Shoureshi says PSU’s commitment to diversity, civic engagement and innovation persuaded him to join the university.Engineering PSU's Future:An interview with Dr. Rahmat Shoureshi by Sheila Martin and Elizabeth MoreheadPage 21Metroscapeenables you to actually reach that goal. And that's why, when I looked at those ele-ments, I realized this is a place that I can make a difference and that's why I decided to come. There are a number of  other fac-tors. You know that for three years in a row now it has been selected by US News & World Report as among the top ten most innovative universities.The other is I have interacted with a num-ber of  the board of  trustees. And I have seen the commitment and devotion that every member of  the board has for this university. So they were another factor. Research is very important. And every-where I have gone I try to make sure that faculty get more engaged in research and scholarship and creative work, because I truly believe that, in order to enhance the quality of  education in the classroom, in the studio, in the lab, and in the exhibits, you've got to be up to date with what's going on in your field. And so, when I see, for example, the Institute for Sustainable Solutions or the transportation centers and see how many faculty are engaged, that is exciting to me. I also believe in cross-disci-plinary studies, both in terms of  research as well as the educational, and I see a good number of  examples of  those here at PSU. So, again, I see the alignment between my interest and some of  the key elements at PSU.Dr. Morehead: You talked a little bit about PSU as an urban school. What is your view of  PSU's role in the metropolitan region?President Shoureshi: I can divide it up into three categories. The first is providing transformational education for the citizens of  that urban setting. And I talked in my convocation speech about how transforma-tive is college education in everybody's life. The demographics you typically see in an urban environment are not typical of  what you may see in a small college town. This is where you see the most diverse group, the people who come from the two extremes of  financial status. This is where you see the number of  minorities. So what that does is provide an opportunity for that urban institution to impact a very diverse group of  constituents. So that's one ele-ment: providing education for a diverse group of  students, some of  whom are nontraditional. I look at this as part of  the pride and opportunity for PSU.The second category is the opportu-nity that an urban university has to really become partners and collaborate with local government. And we have a good number of  examples of  how successful this part-nership has been. It helps that many of  our graduates end up in those government positions. I call it a positive feedback loop that keeps strengthening itself  very well. The third and really very crucial element is the opportunity to build relationships with the business community, because, for those businesses to thrive, they need to have this constant flow of  ideas and opportunity or what I call an intellectual pool that the uni-versity provides. It's that urban institution that has the almost fiduciary responsibility to educate the type of  students and gradu-ates that have the right skills, and therefore the university will have a huge impact on the socioeconomics of  the urban region. And many of  the businesses will be depen-dent on that partnership. So these are the three key elements that I truly believe PSU has demonstrated and will continue playing a leading role in.Dr. Morehead: PSU’s motto is "let knowl-edge serve the city." And certainly that can mean the education of  the population. What does that mean to you beyond that?President Shoureshi: It means serving the city in terms of  education and also bring-ing economic opportunity to the region.Let me give you some examples. When I was at Wayne State back in 1981, the automotive industry was just at the begin-ning of  bringing electronics and micro-control systems into vehicles. Ford Motor Company came to us and said that our engineers graduated when there were hard-ly any computers and we needed to reedu-cate them. We don't want to lose them, at the same time we want to make sure they are more productive for the future of  "...an urban uni-versity has to...become partners and collab-orate with local gov-ernment."Page 22MetroscapeFord. And so we put together what was truly a tailor-made master’s degree program for them. That was my first experience in putting together a cross-disciplinary degree program combining mechanical, electrical, and software engineering. And that was the beginning. After Ford, there was General Motors, there was Chrysler, and you can see how a university could impact the growth and productivity of  the businesses in the region. In Colorado, I had a similar experience when I started with Lockheed Martin. I asked them what type of  engineers they would like to have five years and ten years from now. Listening to them and responding to their needs, to their future needs, made a huge difference. We had a master's and PhD program for Lockheed Martin on mechatronics systems engineering and it was the first of  such programs in the country. And so, that relationship blossomed. The next one was Northrup that came and said we'd like to see a similar arrangement. The university, besides having an educational component, can have a direct impact on the growth of  industry and businesses. And that's what I see PSU really doing with both the local government as well as the state: growing future sectors of  the economy for Portland and for Oregon. Dr. Morehead: Despite our success in attracting a skilled workforce and the com-panies that want to employ them, our region faces many critical issues, including housing affordability, homelessness, racial achievement gap, and state and local government funding crisis. Which of  the region's important chal-lenges are you looking forward to personally engaging in, and how will you approach that issue?President Shoureshi: I truly believe, as an urban university, we need to address all of  those. Homelessness is important to PSU, because number one, this is the population that, for whatever reason, may not have had opportunities. If  there is anything we can do to help them, the least that as a university we can do is provide them the opportunity for education. So homelessness is important to us partly because we are so intertwined. I see on the streets of  the PSU campus the same issues that the rest of  the city is seeing—and the whole area of  housing. Portland has not yet become as bad as New York, Boston, LA, San Diego, Austin or Boulder. So what it would take is to develop, especially through our certificate program in urban design, a long range plan that addresses urbanization not just in the central city—because, if  you only focus it there, all you do is make real estate even more expensive—but also beyond. So that, on "... you can see how a univer-sity could impact the growth and pro-ductivity of the busi-nesses in the region."Page 23Metroscapea larger scale, people would be interested in living there, not because it's cheaper, but because you have designed it so that all of  the amenities extend beyond the central city, including workforce development for the businesses and industry and other key elements. Dr. Morehead: US News and World Report, as you mentioned, has ranked PSU among the top ten most innovative national uni-versities in its Best Colleges 2017 rankings. How important do you think innovation is to a university? President Shoureshi: Huge. Universities have two major roles. One is education and educating the next generation. The other role is creativity and innovation. Let me give you some examples. When you think about how the Silicon Valley started, when you look at the North Carolina Triangle Park, when you look at the whole of  businesses in Austin and La Jolla, Del Mar, San Diego, all those, they didn't just come off  because somebody thought, okay, let me go and I'll start a business there. It was the universities that provided the base of  these new and innovative ideas. It's another key element of  a university to con-tinue innovations and creativity. That would set the tone for the faculty and for our stu-dents. Besides educating the next genera-tion, the university can provide opportuni-ties for, especially, businesses and industry, because they are all looking for innovative ideas. Now, if  you are a major corporation, you can afford to do some of  it internally. But many others, especially small busi-nesses, depend on what the universities are doing, because universities are really centers of  creativity for these small businesses. So that's why innovation is a key element of  a university. It is part of  its mission. Dr. Morehead: What do you think cur-rently is the most innovative part of  Portland State?President Shoureshi: The integration of  what we provide for our undergraduates between classroom education and com-munity education. So, for me to know that some of  our students actually go even to the prisons and try to provide all types of  support systems for prisoners, I think about that. This is such an experience, an especially transforming experience for them to see that happening. I want to go back to what I said earlier, that one of  the attractive features of  PSU is its integration with the city and the community. It's not just saying it, PSU is actually doing it by all of  these projects.A team of  our students has designed hous-ing for women. It isn't just a part of  a great education for them, but it's also something that really has a positive benefit for the community.So, I can see that this has been, and why it has been, selected as a key element of  PSU’s success. This integration with the community brings education and experien-tial learning together. Dr. Morehead: How can we continue to be innovative?President Shoureshi: You've got to do two things. One is to really encourage and incentivize those innovators so that they see that we recognize their effort, and we want to make sure that they are success-ful. The other one is to really create an environment that nurtures innovation and creativity. Both of  those go hand-in-hand and are important. One of  the first things that I asked when I came is, I want to have a meeting with the top fifty most active fac-ulty researchers of  PSU, and this meeting is coming up. And it's not just those who have brought in the highest dollar amounts of  external grants, but also those who have really been active and effective. It could be artists or it could be those who are looking at water quality and air pollution. It's a wide variety. The reason is for me, of  course, to get to know them, but more importantly I want them to know that I care. It’s part of  our future to make sure that they continue this whole area of  creativity and innova-tion.It's important to me. I have seen the bene-fits of  it myself  and have been a researcher all through my academic life. I'm just trying to see if  I could still continue it as a presi-"...small business-es...depend on what the uni-versities are doing, because universi-ties are really cen-ters of cre-ativity."Page 24Metroscapedent or not. I was sending an email to my last graduate student, who is still in New York finishing at the end of  this semester his thesis, to make sure that he's having progress in that regard.So I truly believe in the importance of  being an active scholar. What I call the teacher/scholar model is the right model for faculty.Dr. Morehead: Thank you very much for answering our questions. Metroscape® is published twice a year by the Institute of Metropolitan Studies at Portland State University. Since 1993, we have been informing our readers about  the most significant and timely issues affecting the Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro  metropolitan area—from fiscal crises, to environmental challenges, to nationally  recognized success stories. In addition to giving readers the context to understand the big issues, we also reflect the region’s people and sense of place through poetry, photographs, and well-crafted prose.  As part of our continual effort to improve Metroscape, we are conducting a survey to gain information about the magazine and its readers. Through the 2018 Reader Survey, we hope to better understand who our readers are, how you interact with the magazine, and how we could improve Metroscape to better serve the region. We are asking for just a few moments of your time to make sure we hear your opinions and suggestions so the magazine can best serve your interests. Your participation in this survey is entirely voluntary. The survey should only take a few minutes of your time and is anonymous. Thank you for your time and support in completing this survey.  Metroscape 2018 Reader Survey Your opportunity to influence our future https://survey.zohopublic.com/zs/nLB01i 

Engineering PSU\u27s Future: An Interview with Dr. Rahmat Shoureshi

紀要類（bulletin）Oral Sessionsdepartmental bulletin pape

JANG, Se-Young

OGURA, Shin-ichiro

KAWAMURA, Kensuke

YAYOTA, Masato

YUN, Yeong-Sik

SEONG, Hye-Jin

KIM, Sang-Woo

JEON, Byong-Tae

MOON, Sang-Ho

Tohoku University Repository (TOUR) / 東北大学機関リポジトリ

Seasonal Changes in Forage and AnimalProductivity of Korean Native Goats Grazed atDifferent Forage Type著者 JANG Se-Young, OGURA Shin-ichiro, KAWAMURAKensuke, YAYOTA Masato, YUN Yeong-Sik, SEONGHye-Jin, KIM Sang-Woo, JEON Byong-Tae, MOONSang-Hojournal orpublication titleJournal of Integrated Field Sciencevolume 14page range 96-96year 2017-03URL http://hdl.handle.net/10097/0012123196Oral Session1-2. Seasonal Changes in Forage and Animal Productivity of Korean Native Goats Grazed at Different Forage TypeSe-Young JANG1, Shin-ichiro OGURA3, Kensuke KAWAMURA4, Masato YAYOTA5, Yeong-Sik YUN1, Hye-Jin SEONG1, Sang-Woo KIM2, Byong-Tae JEON1 and Sang-Ho MOON11Division of Food Bio Science, Konkuk University, Chungju, 380-701, Korea2Nation Institute of Animal Science, RDA, 590-832, Korea3Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Japan4Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Japan5Faculty of Applied Biological Science, Gifu University, JapanThis study was conducted to determine grazing intensity of growing Korean native goats (Capra hircus coreanae) on mountainous pasture. It was carried out to obtain basic information for improvement of mountainous pasture management and establishing feeding system of Korean native goats. A total of 30 Korean goat were grouped by feeding system [a pasture grazing group (concentrate body weight 1%, treatment 1), a forage grazing group (concentrate body weight 1.5%, treatment 2) and a barn feeding group (TMR, treatment 3), n=10] to conduct study from May to October. Average daily gains (ADG) for the T1, T2 and T3 group were the highest in June for T1 (99.5±6.4 d/g), May for T2 (166.7±62.9 d/g) and May for T3 (206.7±7.1 d/g). The forage productivity of pasture was the largest from May to June (1718.7±207.5~1672.0±422.8 g/ha) but it was decreased in July (1356.0±103.8 g/ha) because of drought and summer depression. Grazing intensity was calculated by forage productivity and dry matter intake (DMI) and was the highest in May (65 head/ha, T1). Grazing intensity was calculated by forage productivity and DMI and was the highest in May for T1 (65 head/ha) and in May for T2 (58 head/ha). It is desirable that adequate grazing intensity was maintained by adjusting supplemental feed.

Seasonal Changes in Forage and Animal Productivity of Korean Native Goats Grazed at Different Forage Type

紀要類（bulletin）Symposium mini reviewdepartmental bulletin pape

Seasonal Changes in Forage and AnimalProductivity of Korean Native Goats Grazed atDifferent Forage Type著者 JANG Se-Young, OGURA Shin-ichiro, KAWAMURAKensuke, YAYOTA Masato, YUN Yeong-Sik, SEONGHye-Jin, KIM Sang-Woo, JEON Byong-Tae, MOONSang-Hojournal orpublication titleJournal of Integrated Field Sciencevolume 14page range 29-31year 2017-03URL http://hdl.handle.net/10097/0012122129Symposium mini reviewJIFS, 14 : 29 31 (2017)Seasonal Changes in Forage and Animal Productivity of Korean Native Goats Grazed at Different Forage TypeSe-Young JANG1, Shin-ichiro OGURA3, Kensuke KAWAMURA4, Masato YAYOTA5,Yeong-Sik YUN1, Hye-Jin SEONG1, Sang-Woo KIM2, Byong-Tae JEON1 and Sang-Ho MOON1  1Division of Food Bio Science, Konkuk University, Chungju, 380-701, Korea2Nation Institute of Animal Science, RDA, 590-832, Korea3Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Japan4Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Japan5Faculty of Applied Biological Science, Gifu University, JapanCorresponding authors: Sang-Ho MOON, moon0204@kku.ac.krKeywords: goat, grazing, pasture, seasonal changesAbstractThis study was conducted to determine grazing in-tensity of growing Korean native goats (Capra hircus coreanae) on mountainous pasture. It was carried out to obtain basic information for improvement of mountainous pasture management and establishing feeding system of Korean native goats. A total of 30 Korean goat were grouped by feeding system [a pasture grazng group (concentrate body weight 1%, treatment 1), a forage grazing group (concentrate body weight 1.5%, treatment 2) and a barn feeding group (TMR, treatment 3), n=10] to conduct study from May to October. Average daily gains (ADG) for the T1, T2 and T3 group were the highest in June for T1 (99.5±6.4d/g), May for T2 (166.7±62.9d/g) and May for T3 (206.7±7.1d/g). The forage pro-ductivity of pasture was the largest from May to June (1718.7±207.5~1672.0±422.8g/ha) but it was decreased in July (1356.0±103.8g/ha) because of drought and summer depression. Grazing intensity was calculated by forage productivity and dry mat-ter intake (DMI) and was the highest in May for T1 (65head/ha) and in May for T2 (58head/ha). It is desirable that adequate grazing intensity was main-tained by adjusting supplemental feed.IntroductionThe consumption of Korean black goats, which has traditionally been known as a health food, has increased significantly during recent years. The common goat farming system is multiple farming in which large areas of plant resources are available for grazing within fences. And the goats returned to barns where their diet was supplemented with concentrates and this system allows more utilization of grass within the forest (Shahjalal, et al., 1992). Especially, goats differ from other ruminants in their feeding habits, and they appear to have more efficiency in digestion of crude  ber and being better utilizers of poor roughages (Gihad et al, 1980). Hence, goats are highly adaptable with good production potential in the Korea. Geographically, Korea is a mountainous country with 64 percent of its terrain consisting of hills and peaks (Kim, 2002). In addition, Korea having such distinctive four seasons. However, little information is available on the seasonal changes in forage and livestock productivity at different pasture types. The experiment was carried out to obtain basic information for improvement of mountainous pasture management and establishing feeding system of Korean black goats (Capra hircus coreanae). Consequently, the objective of this study was to determine grazing intensity of growing Korean native goats on mountainous pasture.Material and MethodsAnimals and dietsField studies were conducted from the months May to September in order to determine the seasonal forage and animal productivity. Three treatments were selected as experimental farms. Growing goats of farm A (T1) were grazed at pasture and those of farm 30Se-Young Jang et al.Season Farm DM1) CP2) CF3) EE4) NDF5) ADF6) Ash% •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••%in DM•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••May   T1* 28.75±1.81 17.26±0.11 27.46±0.43 3.40±0.11 60.14±0.47 32.10±0.85 7.92±0.15   T2** 11.90±0.87 14.94±0.79 22.70±0.62 6.68±0.06 43.99±0.83 32.86±0.80 13.17±0.69June   T1 33.48±2.56 16.19±0.22 25.22±0.87 4.11±0.33 54.62±0.46 30.92±0.75 7.16±0.15   T2 19.58±0.12 13.71±0.31 23.11±0.85 6.01±0.27 48.03±0.31 40.25±0.49 12.78±0.26July   T1 21.24±2.80 19.98±0.61 23.27±0.55 4.32±0.07 58.50±0.71 24.42±0.83 9.09±0.10   T2 13.32±0.21 19.28±0.69 17.73±0.76 6.82±0.42 41.97±0.59 32.78±0.64 17.52±0.17August   T1 21.04±2.37 19.77±0.25 26.85±0.35 4.24±0.36 62.41±0.84 29.16±0.19 8.69±0.05   T2 14.74±0.48 19.11±0.89 29.52±0.84 6.80±0.38 42.91±0.86 30.09±0.78 13.81±0.68September   T1 20.81±1.57 19.78±0.18 30.25±0.35 4.40±0.03 59.85±0.26 31.96±0.33 8.39±0.05   T2 19.00±1.35 15.26±0.49 16.39±0.62 7.10±0.87 34.90±0.85 25.44±0.47 21.65±0.13Table 1. Seasonal changes in chemical compositions at different pasture and woodland               pasture type grazed by Korea native goats.1)DM: Dry matter 2)CP: Crude protein 3)CF: Crude  ber 4)EE: Ether extract 5)NDF: Neutral detergent  ber 6)ADF: Acid detergent  ber.*T1: pasture grazing group **T2: woodland pasture grazing groupB (T2) were grazed at woodland pasture. Comparison group (T3) was a TMR feeding group. All experiment groups has a ten growing wethers of Korean native black goats (Capra hircus corenae) aged 4 months. Grazing goats were supplemented by concentrates with T1 (1.0%) and T2 (1.5%). The dry matter yield of pasture and average daily gain of goats were seasonally evaluated in T1 and T2 groups. The forage productivity, dry matter intake (DMI) and grazing intensity were conducted by the method of Moon et al. (2015).Chemical analysisForage samples were analyzed for crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), crude fiber (CF) and ash according to the methods of the Association of Of  cial Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 1990). Neutral detergent  ber (NDF) and acid detergent  ber (ADF) was analyzed by the procedures of Van Soest et al. (1970).Statistical analysis Data were expressed as means and standard errors and were statistically analyzed with Tukey multiple range tests using the SAS package (1955) general linear models (GLM) procedure.Results and DiscussionNutrient composition at pastureThe nutrient composition of the experimental pasture is shown in Table 1. Dry matter content was seasonally different at pasture. Body weight and Average daily gainGoats of all farms increased consistently body weight. Average daily gain (ADG) of goats were the highest in June (99.5 d/g, T1), in May (127.6 d/g, T2) and in May (206.7 d/g, T3).Forage productivity, dry matter intake and grazing intensity The forage productivity was decreased from May to October.  The forage productivity of pas ture  was  the  h ighes t  f rom May to  June (1718.7±207.5~1672.0±422.8 kg/ha) but it was decreased in July (1356.0±103.8 kg/ha) because of drought and summer depression (T1). Grazing intensity was calculated by forage productivity and dry matter intake (DMI) and was the highest in May (65 head/ha, T1) and in May (58 head/ha, T2).31May June July August September     T1* (d/g) 19.8 99.5 79.1 81.6 37.9     T2** (d/g) 127.6 72.3 20.0 92.6 20.8     T3*** (d/g) 206.7 92.3 112.5 108.3 149.2*T1: pasture grazing group **T2: woodland pasture grazing group ***T3: TMR grazing groupSeasonal Changes in Forage and Animal Productivity of Korean Native Goats Grazed at Different Forage TypeTable 2. Seasonal change in average daily gain of Korean native goats grazed at different pastureMay June July August September MeanForage productivity (kg/ha)1,718.7 1,672.0 1,356.0 1,280.0 690.7 919.8±207.5 ±422.8 ±103.8 ±153.7 ±95.9 ±480.6Dry matter intake (g/d)678.4 769.7 606.0 689.6 808.0 770.0±209.9 ±380.8 ±1,573.3 ±1,561.6 ±1,902.5 ±170.2Grazing intensity (head/ha) 65 58 58 48 23 39Table 3. Estimated grazing intensity (head/ha) per ha as affected by forage productivity and dry matter intake at pastureTable 4. Estimated grazing intensity (head/ha) per ha as affected by forage productivity and dry matter intake at woodland pastureMay June July August September MeanForage productivity (kg/ha)410.0 460.0 494.7 574.7 506.7 500.9±237.3 ±20.0 ±38.0 ±237.3 ±498.0 ±61.41Dry matter intake (g/d) 650 880 850 870 910 750Grazing intensity (head/ha) 58 14 15 18 15 28ConclusionAs shown in the results of this research, grazing intensity was suggested to average 39 head/ha for T1 and 28 head/ha for T2 from May to September. It is desirable that adequate grazing intensity was maintained by adjusting supplemental feed.AcknowledgementThis work was carried out with the support of the ‘Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ010229)’ Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.ReferencesA.O.A.C. (1990) Official  methods analysis, Association of official analytical chemists, 15th edition. Kenneth Helrich (Ed.) Association of of  cial analytical chemists, Inc. Arlington, VirginiaGihad, E. A., T. M. El-Bedawy and A. Z. Mehrez. (1980) Fiber digestibility by goats and sheep. J. Dairy Sci., 63: 1701.Kim, T.H.,  K.I  Sung.  and B.W. Kim (2002) Sustainable l ivestock production in hil l  a woodland. Forage production and environment in 21C. : 131–156.Shahjalal, M., H. Galbraith and J. H.Topps (1992) The effect of changes in dietary protein and energy on growth, body composition and mohair fiber characteristics of British Angora- goats. Anim. Prod, 54: 405–412.

Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)

https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1131&amp;context=metroscape

Engineering PSU\u27s Future: An Interview with Dr. Rahmat Shoureshi

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

PDXScholar (Portland State University)

Tohoku University Repository (TOUR) / 東北大学機関リポジトリ

Tohoku University Repository (TOUR) / 東北大学機関リポジトリ

Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)