Assessing Concerns and Leading Pedagogical Innovation in Higher Education: A Case Study of the Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business

Abstract

Studies of pedagogical innovation indicate that the implementation process is enhanced by addressing teachers’ concerns. Institutions address teacher preparedness mainly from the perspectives of their preparation and institutional support, without recognising teachers’ mental state and particular implementation concerns. This paper adopts the Concerns Based Adoption Model (CBAM) to examine the Stages of Concern (SoC) of faculty involved in the implementation of pedagogical reform. The standardized 35-item SoC questionnaire was sent online to 152 faculty members and 31 responses were obtained. The study found the faculty body had high levels of self-concerns, low levels of impact concerns and a willingness to continue with the implementation process. The study addressed the theoretical gap in teacher preparedness research by combining the SoC with contextual factors

    Similar works