This paper provides an axiomatic characterization of choices in a setting where a
decision-maker may not fully internalize all the consequences of her choices on herself.
Such a departure from rationality, it turns out, is common across a variety of positive
behavioral models and admits the standard rational choice model as a special case. We
show that choice data satisfying (a) Senís axioms if and
fully characterize behavioral
decisions, and (b) Senís axiom if and if fully characterize standard decision-making. In
addition, we show that (a) it is possible to identify a minimal and a maximal set of
psychological states using choice data alone, and (b) under specific choice scenarios,
"revealed mistakes" can be inferred directly from choice data
