Context: The main objective of open data initiatives is to make information freely available through easily accessible mechanisms and facilitate exploitation. In practice openness should be accompanied with a certain level of trustwor- thiness or guarantees about the quality of data. Traditional data quality is a thoroughly researched field with several benchmarks and frameworks to grasp its dimensions. However, quality assessment in open data is a complicated process as it consists of stakeholders, evaluation of datasets as well as the publishing platform.
Objective: In this work, we aim to identify and synthesize various features of open data quality approaches in practice. We applied thematic synthesis to identify the most relevant research problems and quality assessment methodologies. Method: We undertook a systematic literature review to summarize the state of the art on open data quality. The review process starts by developing the review protocol in which all steps, research questions, inclusion and exclusion criteria and analysis procedures are included. The search strategy retrieved 9323 publications from four scientific digital libraries. The selected papers were published between 2005 and 2015. Finally, through a discussion between the authors, 63 paper were included in the final set of selected papers.
Results: Open data quality, in general, is a broad concept, and it could apply to multiple areas. There are many quality issues concerning open data hindering their actual usage for real-world applications. The main ones are unstruc- tured metadata, heterogeneity of data formats, lack of accuracy, incompleteness and lack of validation techniques. Furthermore, we collected the existing quality methodologies from selected papers and synthesized under a unifying classification schema. Also, a list of quality dimensions and metrics from selected paper is reported.
Conclusion: In this research, we provided an overview of the methods related to open data quality, using the instru- ment of systematic literature reviews. Open data quality methodologies vary depending on the application domain. Moreover, the majority of studies focus on satisfying specific quality criteria. With metrics based on generalized data attributes a platform can be created to evaluate all possible open dataset. Also, the lack of methodology validation remains a major problem. Studies should focus on validation techniques
