A. Sozza

F. Rozzo

L. Giaccone

L. Spinolo

M. Tartaglia

English

GIACCONE, LUCA

TARTAGLIA, Michele

PORTO@iris (Publications Open Repository TOrino - Politecnico di Torino)

05 August 2020POLITECNICO DI TORINORepository ISTITUZIONALEImprovement of the energy networks in a small town district / L. Giaccone; F. Rozzo; A. Sozza; L. Spinolo; M. Tartaglia. -STAMPA. - (2008), pp. 1-6. ((Intervento presentato al convegno WESC 2008 tenutosi a IASI ROMANIA nel 29 GIUGNO2 LUGLIO 2008.OriginalImprovement of the energy networks in a small town districtPublisher:PublishedDOI:Terms of use:openAccessPublisher copyright(Article begins on next page)This article is made available under terms and conditions as specified in the  corresponding bibliographic description inthe repositoryAvailability:This version is available at: 11583/1906268 since:IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENERGY NETWORKS  IN A SMALL TOWN DISTRICT L. Giaccone(1), F. Rozzo(2), A. Sozza(3), L. Spinolo(4), M. Tartaglia(1) (1) Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy (2) Municipality of Torino, Torino, Italy (3) Gradenigo Hospital, Torino, Italy (4) GTT Gruppo Torinese Trasporti, Torino, Italy E-mail:luca.giaccone@polito.it   Abstract  Recent studies have shown that the primary energy consumption in the EU-25 has risen steadily doubling its value with reference to the year 1970. Current greenhouse gas emissions are still too high as clearly recognised in the Kyoto process. As a consequence of these energy developments, CO2 emissions will rise significantly up to 2010 which is clearly incompatible with the EU’s climate policy. Within this scenario it has been developed the idea of improving the energy use by introducing energy networks. It will be analyzed a district ot Torino which includes an hospital called Gradenigo, a public primary school and a parking managed by the local transport utility. A micro-grid will substitute the actual energy independent circuits making advantages of a suitable energy management. The new structure will be based on a polygeneration system. In particular a tri-generation plant and a Photovoltaic system will be installed. In this paper the energy consumption analysis of the existing systems will be given which is the base to design the proposed grid systems. Technical and economical design of the new network will be justified predicting the energetic and environmental balance in order to highlight the primary energy savings and the CO2 reduction that the new technologies offers Keywords: energy smart grid, trigeneration, photovoltaic installations, electric vehicles.   1. INTRODUCTION  Recent studies have shown that the primary energy consumption in the EU-25 has risen steadily doubling its value with reference to the year 1970 [1]. As a consequence of these energy developments, CO2 emissions are expected to rise significantly up to 2010 which is clearly incompatible with the EU’s climate policy. Within this scenario it has been developed the idea of improving the energy use by introducing energy networks. In this paper it will be analyzed a district which includes an hospital named Gradenigo, a public primary school and a parking managed by the local transport utility GTT. The existing network is represented in Figure 1 and the energy needs of the users are summarized in Table 1.  Table 1 – Energy needs  Hospital Gradenigo Group of schools Parking Electricity yes yes yes Heating yes yes no Cooling yes no no  A micro-grid will substitute the actual energy independent circuits making advantages of a suitable energy management, Figure 2. The new structure will be based on a polygeneration system. In particular a trigeneration plant (also known as Combined Heat and Cooling Power or CHCP) will be installed to produce electricity, heating and cooling mainly for the hospital. The cogenerator (CHP, Combined Heat Power) will be coupled to the heating system of the hospital and to an absorption chiller in order to give a contribution to the cooling demand. Moreover PV modules will be installed in the district and connected in parallel to the existing low voltage network.   Electrical energyHeat energyNatural GasCold energyT.P. = Thermal plantH.E. = Heat ExchangerCHP = Combined Heat & PowerABS = Absorption Cycle T.P.Heat circuitCold circuitElectric circuitElectric circuitCold circuitHeat circuitT.P.Electric circuitElectric circuitHeat circuitT.P.UtilityGradenigo Hospital (New Side)Gradenigo Hospital (Old Side)GTT parking Group of schoolsBatteriesof Electric buses Figure 1 – Existing network    In this paper the energy consumption analysis of the existing systems will be given and this will be the base to design the proposed grid systems. Technical and economical design of the new network will be justified predicting the energetic and environmental balance in order to highlight the primary energy savings and the CO2 reduction that the new technologies offers. The environmental balance has been done using the emission factors referenced in [2, 3, 4] and listed here below: • ef_elt: emission factor for separate production of electricity. The mentioned kWh correspond to the electrical energy produced • ef_th: emission factor for separate production of heating. The mentioned kWh correspond to the thermal energy produced • ef_chp: emission factor for combined production of electricity and heating. The mentioned kWh correspond to the CHP fuel  Table 2 – Emission factor ef_elt ef_th ef_chp kg CO2/kWh kg CO2/kWh kg CO2/kWh 0.494 0.252 0.202  2. USER CONSUMPTION ANALYSYS  As a general rule suitable for every field, the benefit of a new development have to be defined with reference to a common base configuration. In this paper the base configuration is obtained evaluating the actual consumption of the users in the district.   Heat circuitCold circuitElectric circuitElectric circuitCold circuitHeat circuitH.E.H.E. T.P.Electric circuitHeat circuitH.E. T.P.UtilityCHPABSGradenigo Hospital (New Side)Gradenigo Hospital (Old Side)GTT parking Group of schoolsPV systemBatteriesof Electric busesElectric circuitT.P.H.E. H.E. Figure 2 – Future network  The district user with higher consumption is the hospital, the schools have an intermediate consumption and finally we have the parking. Unfortunately some technical constraints make impossible (or not convenient) the installation of a new energy source in the schools. In fact in these building there is no space for the installation of a CHP/CHCP unit and the roofs are not oriented in a suitable direction for a PV system installation. Therefore the CHCP unit will be installed in the existing thermal plant of the hospital and the PV system will be installed on the parking roof.  2.1 Gradenigo Hospital  Electricity consumption The main building of the district is the hospital named Gradenigo. This is the user that requires a more detailed analysis because it needs at the same time energy for electricity, heating and cooling. As frequently happen the most detailed data are available for the electricity consumption because big users, like hospitals, can buy electricity at prices defined with reference to the hourly bands. In this case the local utility installs an energy meter which stores the user load profile. Through the data downloaded from this meter it is possible to derive 2 typical days per month, one is representative for week days (Figure 3) and the other one for week-end days (Figure 4).  0 5 10 15 2002004006008001000Hour[kW]Electricity consumption - Week DaysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Figure 3 - Gradenigo Electricity load profiles - Week Days   0 5 10 15 200100200300400500600700800900Hour[kW]Electricity consumption - Week-end DaysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Figure 4 - Gradenigo Electricity load profiles - Week-end Days  The annual energy consumption for electricity is equal to 4925213 kWhe.  Heating consumption The evaluation of heating consumption has been done using the energy bills. This means that the thermal load profile are not directly available. The evaluation of the Gradenigo thermal consumption during the day have been done using the load profile of another hospital in Rome called “Fondazione Santa Lucia”. The consumption of this hospital are taken from reference [5]. Using this notation: • jSLthP −− : “Fondazione Santa Lucia” thermal consumption in the hour j; • jGthP −− : “Gradenigo” thermal consumption in the hour j; • dSLthE −− : “Fondazione Santa Lucia” thermal consumption in the day d; • dGthE −− : “Gradenigo” thermal consumption in the day d;  the Gradenigo load profile are found by means of the following equation:   jSLthdSLthdGthjGth PEEP−−−−−−−−=  with j=1,…,24 (1)  The load profile of “Fondazione Santa Lucia” have been reshaped in order to obtain the daily Gradenigo energy consumption achieving the result in Figure 5. Heating profiles are not divided in week or week-end days because they mainly depend on the external temperature and not on the day of the week.  The annual energy consumption for heating is equal to 8170334 kWht.  Cooling consumption Cooling consumption are often hidden in the electrical one because cooling energy is, in most of the thermal plant, supplied from electrical chiller. Therefore cooling consumption are included in already included in the load profiles of Figure 3 and Figure 4. 0 5 10 15 200500100015002000Hour[kW]Heating consumptionJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Figure 5 - Gradenigo Thermal load profiles  Daily Electricity Consumption010000200003000040000Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecEnergy [kWhe] Figure 6 – Energy consumption for cooling demand  Cooling load profile have been evaluated by mean of energetic consideration. Figure 6 shown that in summer months the daily electricity consumption increase due to cooling demand. The amount of daily electrical energy corresponding to the cooling demand ( )celE −  can be used for deriving a simple cooling load profile defined by the average absorbed power cooling ( )cP :   CHccelcCOPhEP −=  (2) where: • ch  are the working hour of the cooling system (here supposed equal to 16) • cCOP  are the Coefficient Of Performance of the electric chiller (here supposed equal to 3)  Figure 7 shows the cooling profile (only for week days for the sake of brevity) obtained following this procedure. It has to be stressed that now the electricity load profiles in Figure 3 and Figure 4 have to be updated removing the cooling demand just calculated. The new electricity load profile are show in Figure 8.  0 5 10 15 2002004006008001000120014001600Hour[kW]Cooling consumption - Week DaysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Figure 7 – Cooling load profiles – Week Days  0 5 10 15 200100200300400500600700800900Hour[kW]Electricity consumption - Week DaysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Figure 8 – Gradenigo Electricity load profiles without cooling demand  The annual energy consumption for cooling is equal to 2032400 kWh.c and the electricity consumption without the cooling demand is 4328100 kWhe.  2.2 School  The total consumption in the school of the district are: • 49416 kWhe of electricity • 604143 kWht for heating The total consumption of the school is very low with respect to the hospital consumption, therefore the trigeneration system will be designed on the basis of the hospital energy demand.  2.3 Parking  The last important user is the parking of the district. It is managed by the local transport utility. From the point of view of the energy consumption it needs only electrical energy for the lighting system and for charging the electrical buses used for the public transport. The annual electricity consumption, evaluated by the electrical bills, is  400800 kWh. The charging activity is the lower part of this consumption, in fact one bus need 10 kWh of electricity for its charge, and during the day 8 buses are charged. The charging activity is done only during the week days of the year (about 260). Therefore the annual electricity consumption of the parking is:   kWhkWhbusesdays 20800)(10)(8)(260 =⋅⋅   The energy demand for charging the electric buses is about the 5% of the total consumption.  3. CHCP PLANT PRELIMINARY DESIGN  The performance of the CHCP plant are tightly dependent from the user requirements. In other word the higher will be the utilization of the CHCP produced energy, the higher will be the investment profitability and the environmental benefit. The user directly connected to the CHCP system is the hospital, therefore its load profiles (electricity, heating and cooling demand) have been used for simulating the best production system. A CHCP system is composed by a cogenerator (CHP) thermally coupled with an absorption chiller (ABS). Starting from 11 different CHPs and 15 different ABSs all the possible combination have been analyzed for a total of 176 configuration (also the CHPs without ABSs have been considered). The detailed method for evaluating the best CHCP system is out of the scope of this paper so that only the final results will be presented. The CHCP system with best performances is composed by: • Internal combustion engine with 526 kW o electrical power and 656 kW of thermal power • Absorption cycle with 209 kW of cooling power  The economical results are shown in Table 3 where: • I is the initial cost • NPV is the Net Present Value • DPBP is the Discounted Pay Back Period • IRR is the Internal Rate of Return  For more detail about the economic indicator see reference [6].  Finally the energetical results are summarized in Table 4.  Table 3 – Economical results (CHCP) I NPV(15 years) DPBP IRR €  €  years  % 551950 1398209 3.01 37  Table 4 – Energetic results (CHCP) Working hours 4928   Fuel Consumption 6758111  [kWh] Electricity production 2592128  [kWh] Electricity selfconsumption 2513825  [kWh] Thermal energy production 3232768  [kWh] Thermal energy selfconsumtion 2562657  [kWh] Thermal waste 219939  [kWh] Cooling power produced with ABS 337629 [kWh] Primary Energy Savings (PES) 37  [%] Themal Limit (LT) 54 [%] CO2 reduction 611  [tCO2] CO2 reduction spec 31  [%]  In Table 4 the rows concerning PES and LT need a deeper explanation. The PES can be calculated with equation (3)   SPCHPSPEEEPES −=  (3) Where: • ESP is the primary energy consumption with seperete production of electricity and heating • ECHP is the primary energy consumption of the CHP The TL indicator can be calculated with equation (4)   tetT EEEL+=  (4) Where: • Ee is the electrical energy produced by a section of CHP production • Et is the thermal energy produced by a section of CHP production and really used for industrial or civil purposes These two indicator are necessary in Italy for defining a CHP unit. A cogenerator is officially defined a CHP if are satisfied the following constraints:  1) IRE > 0.05 (5%) for existing section  0.08 (8%) for extended part of existing section  0.1 (10%) for new section  2) LT > 0.33 (33%) for size up to 10 MWe  0.22 (22%) for size between 10 and 25 MWe  0.15 (15%) for size over 25 MWe  4. PV SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN  The PV system will be installed on the roof of the parking. During a PV system feasibility study the variables with more influence on the installable power are the economic capability of the investor and the area available for the module installation. These two constraints lead us to the choice of a PV system of 50 kWp. The PV system energy production can be evaluated by this simple formula:   PVPVPV SIE ηη ⋅⋅⋅=  (5)  where: • I is the Irradiation on the surface modules [kWh/m2] • S is the total surface of the PV systems [m2] • PVη  is the module efficiency • gη  is the global efficiency of the other components of the system (inverter, cable, etc…). Usually is considered 75%.  Considering that the module efficiency is defined in Standard Test Conditions (STC), i.e. irradiance 1 kW/m2 (here the other parameters defined in the STC, like cell temperature can be neglected), PVη  can be written introducing the nominal power of the system ( )nP :   [ ][ ]221 mSmkWkWPnPV=η  (6)  Using equation (6) in equation (5) and doing some simplification we obtain:   neqgnsPV PhPhE ⋅=⋅⋅= η  (7)  where: • sh  are the equivalent hours of the sun • gseq hh η⋅=  are the equivalent hours of the PV system The parameter eqh  depends on the geographical latitude and on the module orientation. In the city of Torino, for PV system with optimal tilt angle (34°) oriented in south direction, the eqh  is equal to 1167 hours. Therefore the electricity production of the PV system is:   kWhkWhoursEPV 58530)(50)(1167 =⋅=   This production correspond to 28.91 tCO2 reduction. In Table 5 the economical result for the PV system are shown. Table 5 – Economical result (PV) I NPV(20 years) DPBP IRR € € anni % 301135 247407 8.2 13.6  5. CONCLUSIONS  The energetic balance of a small district in Torino has been done in order to evaluate the benefits of the distributed generation. The new energy network has been designed in order to connect all the single user together and two different technologies for DG will be implemented: a trigeneration plant and a PV system. The aim of the paper is to promote the possible results achievable using DG generation from the economical and environmental point of view. In general, for a trigeneration system, the higher is the power of the plant the higher will be the final gain in both cases. Of course the power of the plant is limited by the user consumption because the final result depend on the energy supplied to the local user. In other words, if the CHCP plant size is too big a lot of energy waste will be done. Therefore a trigeneration plant needs to be very carefully designed on the basis of the actual user load profiles for being sure to achieve calculated results. Finally, a PV system production has been introduced which is relatively low with respect to the parking consumption but enough for the charging activity of the electric buses. This is in any case a good results because usually electric buses are a weak solution to the environmental problem, i.e. they are emission free from the local point of view but their energy needs are satisfied by power plant far away from the urban centre. Under this configuration and from the global point of view the electric buses don’t give any help to the environmental problem. In the future the PV plant will supply enough energy for the electric buses so that the public transport performed by means of electric buses in Torino can be defined emission free.  6. REFERENCES   [1] Commission staff working document, “A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy”, Brussels, 2006 [2] APAT Report, “Analisi dei fattori di emissione di CO2 dal settore dei trasporti”, Roma,, 2003 [3] EDUCOGEN Report, “A guide to cogeneration”, Brussels,, 2001 [4] EDUCOGEN Report, “The European Educational Tool on Cogeneration”, Brussels,, 2001 [5] ENEA Report, “Intervento di cogenerazione per il complesso ospedaliero Fondazione Santa Lucia”, Roma, 2000 [6] F. Karagiannis, “Central cogeneration units in athens-an economical approach,” in Electrotechnical Conference, 2000. MELECON 2000. 10th Mediterranean, vol. 3, 29-31 May 2000, pp. 1032–1035, vol.3. 

Improvement of the energy networks in a small town district

https://iris.polito.it/retrieve/handle/11583/1906268/50794/CNF15_WESC_2008_Improvement_of_the_energy.pdf

Improvement of the energy networks in a small town district

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

PORTO@iris (Publications Open Repository TOrino - Politecnico di Torino)