National Institute for Japanese Language and LinguisticsNational Institute for Japanese Language and LinguisticsNational Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistic

Hajime Oshima

Masahiro Yamada

Nobuko Kibe

大島 一

山田 真寛

木部 暢子

application/pdfNational Institute for Japanese Language and LinguisticsNational Institute for Japanese Language and LinguisticsNational Institute for Japanese Language and Linguisticsjournal articl

木部, 暢子

7628

大島, 一

7629

山田, 真寛

7630

Kibe, Nobuko

7631

Oshima, Hajime

7632

Yamada, Masahiro

7633

Academic Repository of the National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics / 国立国語研究所学術情報リポジトリ

国立国語研究所学術情報リポジトリPlural Forms in Yoron-Ryukyuan and AddressNouns in Ryukyuan Languages著者(英) Nobuko Kibe, Hajime Oshima, Masahiro Yamadajournal orpublication title25page range 1-11year 2018-12-01URL http://doi.org/10.15084/00002237Japanese/Korean Linguistics 25. Edited by Shin Fukuda, Mary Shin Kim, and Mee-Jeong Park. Copyright © 2018, CSLI Publications 1 Plural Forms in Yoron-Ryukyuan    and Address Nouns in Ryukyuan Languages NOBUKO KIBE, HAJIME OSHIMA, AND MASAHIRO YAMADA National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics 1 Introduction 1.1 Plural Marking in Standard Japanese and Yoron-Ryukyuan Standard Japanese has a plural marker -tatɕi that attaches to human nouns and yields an associative plural interpretation. This plural marker may attach to pronouns (1a), proper nouns (1b) or kinship terms (1c) but it cannot attach to non-human nouns (1d), (1e) (see Nakanishi and Tomioka (2014) for the semantic interpretation of NP-tatɕi).  (1) a. anata-tatɕi   2SG-ASSOCPL   ‘a group of people represented by the addressee’   NOBUKO KIBE, HAJIME OSHIMA AND MASAHIRO YAMADA  b. Nagano-san-tatɕi   Nagano-ADDR-ASSOCPL   ‘a group of people represented by “Nagano-san”’  c. obasan-tatɕi   aunt-ASSOCPL   ‘a group of people represented by “aunt”’  d.  *neko-tatɕi   cat-ASSOCPL   ‘a group of individuals represented by “cat”’  e. *hana-tatɕi   flower-ASSOCPL   ‘a group of individuals represneted by “flower”’  In Yoron-Ryukyuan  too, there is also an associative plural marker -taa that attaches to human nouns like Standard Japanese -tatɕi. The lexical accent, realized as a transitional pitch rise between moras, is marked by “[“ following Uwano’s (1999) convention.  (2) a. ʔu[ɾee-taa ‘2SG-AssocPL’  b. Nagano-[san-taa ‘Nagano-ADDR-ASSOCPL’  c. [ɸuba-taa ‘aunt-ASSOCPL’  d. *mjaŋ[ka-taa ‘cat-ASSOCPL’  e. *pa[na-taa ‘flower-ASSOCPL’  In addition to associative plural, Yoron also exhibits a specialized expression for additive plural, which is likewise realized by -taa. However, this marker cannot be conflated with the marker for associative plural and has to be analyzed as a different morpheme. Indeed, while both markers are segmentally identical, they are systematically differentiated by prosody. As is shown in (3)-(4), accentless -taa marks associative plural, while accented -taa expresses additive plural (see Uwano (1999) for the accent realization of non-lexical items in Yoron).  (3) a. [ʔatɕa-taa   father-ASSOCPL   ‘a group of people represented by “father”’  b. ʔatɕa-[taa   father-ADDITPL   ‘a group of people with the attribute “father”’    PLURAL FORMS IN YORON AND ADDRESS NOUNS IN RYUKYUAN LANGUAGES (4) a. sen[sei-taa   teacher-ASSOCPL   ‘a group of people represented by “teacher”’  b. sensei-[taa   teacher-ADDITPL    ‘a group of people with the attribute “teacher”’  Although the additive plural interpretation can be conceptualized as a special case of associative plural, -[taa exclusively expresses the semantically more restricted non-associative additive plural interpretation. For instance, the noun phrase in (4a) can refer to a group of individuals that includes some non-teachers, provided that the group is understood as one represented by a teacher. Contrary to that, the noun phrase in (4b)  can only refer to a group composed exclusively of individuals all possessing the attribute “teacher”.   Below, we show that the distribution of the Yoron additive plural marker is more restricted than that of the associative plural marker and that it is only available for a subset of human nouns which all share one specific property, namely the possibility to be used as an address term. We then enlarge the discussion to other Ryukyuan languages, and point out that in these languages too, the property of addressability plays a defining role in several different grammatical phenomena. 1.2 Yoron Yoron-Ryukyuan refers to the linguistic variety of Kunigami language spoken in Yoron island (Yoron-town, Oshima-gun, Kagoshima prefecture, Japan). It belongs to the Northern-Ryukyuan language group and is, like other Ryukyuan languages, severely endangered. All present day speakers of Yoron are bilingual in Japanese and the youngest generations are now completely monolingual in Japanese. Yoron island is situated at the southernmost edge of the Amami islands,  approximately 22km away from the Northern tip of Okinawa's  main island. The island is divided into nine administrative districts and is characterized by systematic dialectal variations. The data reported in this paper is provided by a consultant from (Mugiya-)Higashi-district, Hidenori Kiku, born in 1957 (see Nakamoto (1976) and Kibe (2016) for Yoron's typological characteristics and its dialectal variations).      NOBUKO KIBE, HAJIME OSHIMA AND MASAHIRO YAMADA                           Figure 1. Location of Yoron island  According to Yoron-town (2015), there are 5186 inhabitants in the island, including 650 in Higashi-district. The accurate number of fluent speakers of Yoron is not known. However, based on personal accounts from local community members, we assume that fluent speakers are all above fifty. Based on Yoron-town's population statistics  (Table.1), the number of fluent speakers is then estimated to be 2919 (i.e. population above fifty, approximately 56% of the total population). Assuming that the age distribution in Higashi-district is the same as that in the whole town, the number of fluent speakers in Higashi-district is estimated to be 366 (Table.2).    PLURAL FORMS IN YORON AND ADDRESS NOUNS IN RYUKYUAN LANGUAGES Age Group Population Ratio Age Group Population Ratio 40-49 544 10.49% 40≤ 3463 66.78% 50-59 815 15.76% 50≤ 2919 56.29% 60-69 820 15.81% 60≤ 2104 40.57% 70-79 578 11.15% 70≤ 1284 24.78% 80≤ 706 13.61%    Total 5186     Table 1. Population and Ratio of Yoron-town (as of 2015)  Age Group Estimated Pupulation  Age GroupEstimatedPopulation40-49 68  40≤ 434 50-59 102  50≤ 366 60-69 103  60≤ 264 70-79 72  70≤ 161 80≤ 88    Total 650    Table 2. Estimated Population of Higashi-district (as of 2015)  2 Yoron’s Two Plural Markers 2.1 A Puzzle The distribution of the additive plural marker is more restricted than that of the associative plural marker. For example, both markers can attach to jaka ‘elder.brother’ and sensei ‘teacher’, yielding two different contrastive interpretations (5)-(6). However, only the associative plural marker can attach to ʔut[tubi ‘younger.sibling’ and seito ‘students’, the additive plural marker being in that case ungrammatical (7)-(8).  (5) a. [jaka-taa ‘elder.brother-ASSOCPL’  b. jaka-[taa ‘elder.brother-ADDITPL’ (6) a. seɴ[sei-taa ‘teacher-ASSOCPL’    b. seɴsei-[taa ‘teacher-ADDITPL’  (8) a. ʔut[tubi-taa ‘younger.sibling-ASSOCPL’  b. *ʔuttubi-[taa ‘younger.sibling-ADDITPL’ (7) a. [seito-taa ‘student-ASSOCPL’  b. *seito-[taa ‘student-ADDITPL’  NOBUKO KIBE, HAJIME OSHIMA AND MASAHIRO YAMADA At first sight, the difference in distribution seems puzzling since all  nouns in (5)-(8) belong to the same macro-category, namely human nouns (note also that Standard Japanese -tatɕi can attach to all of them). Furthermore, this distribution cannot be accounted for by the nominal hierarchy usually proposed in the literature. For example, Tsunoda (2009) divides common nouns into four classes: kinship, non-kinship human, non-human animate, and inanimate nouns. However, both the pair (5)-(6), in which the additive plural marker is allowed, and the pair (7)-(8), in which the same marker is ungrammatical, each include one kinship term (higher in the hierarchy) and one non-kinship human noun (lower in the hierarchy).  Therefore, the data in (5)-(8) compels us to look for some other factor explaining the distribution of plural markers in Yoron.  2.2 Address Nouns In Yoron, human nouns can be classified into two groups using the criterion of addressability. Nouns refering to senior people (e.g. [jaka ‘elder brother’, [ʔupu ‘grandfather’) or to people with a higher social rank (ɕa[ʨoo ‘CEO’, seɴ[sei ‘professor’) can be used as such as address terms (equivalent in their addressative function to, for example, English “Sir”). The other human nouns (e.g. ʔut[tubi ‘younger sibling’, [seito ‘student’) cannot be used as address term, in which case the name of the referent has to be used.  (see Suzuki (1973) and Takubo (1997) for Standard Japanese and Pellard (2010) and many others cited below for Ryukyuan). Pellard (2010; 132) groups the nouns allowing the addressative function into one category he calls “address nouns”. This category of nouns contain “kinship terms for elders (‘father’, ‘elder sister’, etc.) and status or function names (‘teacher’, ‘chief’ etc.)”. We show below examples of address nouns and non-address nouns in Yoron. Here, it is important to note that the category of address nouns cross-splits across both the category of kinship terms and that of non-kinship human nouns.  (9) Expressions that can be used to address someone   a.  [ʔupu ‘grandfather’  b. paa[paa ‘grandmother’  c. [ʔaʨa ‘father’  d. ʔam[maa ‘mother’  e. [jaka ‘elder brother’  f. aɲ[ɲaa ‘elder sister’   g. [ɸuʥa ‘uncle’  h. [ɸuba ‘aunt’  k. seɴ[sei ‘teacher’  l. ɕa[ʨoo ‘CEO’ PLURAL FORMS IN YORON AND ADDRESS NOUNS IN RYUKYUAN LANGUAGES  (10) Expressions that cannot be used to address someone  a. [miikwaa ‘nephew/niece’  b. ʔut[tubi ‘younger sibling’  c. [seito ‘student’  d. ni[see ‘young man/woman’  2.3 Nouns allowing the Additive Plural Markers are Address Nouns Upon closer inspection, we find that the distribution of the additive plural marker is exactly correlated with the addressability property of human nouns. In other words, the additive plural marker can attach to address nouns, but not to the other human nouns, whether they be kinship terms (Table.3) or non-kinship human nouns (Table.4).  Adress Nouns Gloss SingularAssociative Plural Additive Plural YES grandfather [ʔupu ʔu[pu-taa ʔupu-[taa YES grandmother paa[paa paa[paa-taa paapaa-[taa YES father [ʔaʨa [ʔaʨa-taa ʔaʨa-[taa YES mother ʔam[maa ʔam[maa-taa ʔammaa-[taa YES elder brother [jaka [jaka-taa jaka-[taa YES elder sister aɲ[ɲaa aɲ[ɲaa-taa aɲɲaa-[taa YES uncle [ɸuʥa [ɸuʥa-taa ɸuʥa-[taa YES aunt [ɸuba [ɸuba-taa ɸuba-[taa NO nephew/niece [miikwaa [miikwaa-taa N/A NO younger sibling ʔut[tubi ʔut[tubi-taa N/A Table 3. Address Nouns and Plural Forms, Kinship Terms  Adress Nouns Gloss SingularAssociative Plural Additive Plural YES teacher seɴ[sei seɴ[sei-taa seɴsei-[taa YES CEO ɕa[ʨoo ɕa[ʨoo-taa ɕaʨoo-[taa NO student [seito [seito-taa N/A NO young people ni[see ni[see-taa nisee-[taa N/A Table 4. Address Nouns and Plural Forms, Human Nouns1                                                           1 Many other human nouns take a third expression -(bi)nɕaa for plural form.  NOBUKO KIBE, HAJIME OSHIMA AND MASAHIRO YAMADA 3 The Noun Class “Address Terms” Plays a Role in the Grammar of Ryukyuan Languages The result above shows that the category of “address nouns” plays an important role in the grammar of Yoron, since, beyond the adressability property of the relevant nouns, it can also account for the distribution of the additive plural marker. Actually, the category of “address nouns” plays an important role in other Ryukyuan languages too (Shigeno and Shirata (2016) make a smilar claim). The noun class “address nouns” correlates with the choice of different plural markers in Kamikatetsu-Kikai and Onotsu-Kikai (Shirata et al. 2011, Shigeno and Shirata 2016), Ura-Amami (Shigeno and Shirata 2016), Yuwan-Amami (Niinaga 2010, 2015), Okinoerabu (Yokoyama 2014), and Ōgami-Miyako (Pellard 2010). For example, Ōgami-Miyako has two (associative) plural markers -ta and -nummi and Pellard (2010:131) reports that “-ta attaches to pronouns referring to humans as well as address nouns, while -nummi attaches to other animate nouns”.  (11) a. kama=n=tu taɾo-ta=ka uɯ.   there=DAT=FOC Taro-PL=NOM be    ‘Taro and the others are over there.’  b. uɾɛ=ɛ  an-ta=ka faa-nummi.   PROX=TOP I-PL=NOM child-PL   ‘These are our children.’   (Pellard’s (2010) (29a) and (29c))  Niinaga (2010: 57) describes associative plural (“approximantive” for him) markers in Yuwan-Amami and says that “-taa can attach to demonstratives, human names, elder kinship terms, and profession names” and “kinship terms which refer to younger people do not take the approximative suffix -taa, but take the approximative clitic =nkja”.  (12) a. zjuu-taa=ga ik-ju-i.   father-APPR=NOM go-IPFV-NPST   ‘(My) father and some people will go.’  b. maga=nkja=nu  ik-ju-i.   grandchild= APPR=NOM go-IPFV-NPST   ‘(My) grandchild and some people will go.’   (Niinaga’s (2010) (43) and (44))  PLURAL FORMS IN YORON AND ADDRESS NOUNS IN RYUKYUAN LANGUAGES In addition to the domain of the plural marking, the noun class “address nouns” also correlates with the choice of nominative and/or genitive case markers in Irabu-Miyako (Shimoji 2017) and Yonaguni (Yamada 2015) in addition to those languages just mentioned (see van der Lubbe & Tokunaga (2016) for Okinoerabu in this respect). For instance, according to Pellard (2010: 143), Ōgami-Miyako’s nominative-genitive marker “ka is used with nominals located on the upper part of the hierarchy (pronouns and address nouns), and nu with the other nominals”.  (13) a. a=ka=tu kss.   I= NOM= FOC come   ‘Here I come!’  b. mii-taɯ=nu pstu=nu  kss-i.   three-CLF= NOM person=NOM come-CVB   ‘Three people came.’   (Pellard’s (2010) (50a) and (50b))  Irabu-Miyako’s genitive marker alternation also correlates with the noun class “address nouns”. Furthermore, Shimoji (2017: 142) explains the special status of the noun class “address nouns” in terms of personal pronominal system and claims that the alternation of genitive markers =ga or =nu in Irabu-Miyako is “dependent primarily on whether a given nominal is integrated into personal pronominal system”. He gives an interesting pair of examples (14a-b) (provided in the text withotu the gloss) and explains the difference as follows: “there are certain nouns that are used in place of pronouns in Irabu, such as proper names, kinship terms for elders (e.g. uja ‘father’; ani ‘elder sister’) and a restricted set of social status terms (e.g. sinsii ‘teacher’;soncjoo ‘mayor’), and they are marked by =ga when they are used in place of personal/demonstrative pronouns, as in [(14a)]. Such nouns may be marked by =nu when they are not used pronominally, as in” (14b).  (14) a. sinsii=ga ffa=a umukutukam=mi.   ‘(addressing teacher) your child is smart, teacher.’  b. sinsii=nu ffa=a umukutukar kutu=nu   uu-kam.   ‘(in general) a teacher’s child tends to be smart.’ 4 Conclusion We have shown that Yoron has a designated additive plural marker in addition to the associative plural marker. Both markers are segmentally NOBUKO KIBE, HAJIME OSHIMA AND MASAHIRO YAMADA identical but are suprasegmentally differentiated. We have pointed out that only a subset of kinship terms and non-kinship human nouns can host the additive plural marker. It was demonstrated that the nouns that can host the additive plural marker are the ones that can be used to address someone. The class of nouns that can be used to address someone is what Pellard (2010) call “address nouns”. We pointed out that the noun class “address nouns” plays a role in several other grammatical domains of many Ryukyuan languages. Although it is yet unclear what the linguistic or grammatical basis is for such a noun class, we believe that further investigation will deepen our understanding of Ryukyuan languages or Japonic languages in general. Acknowledgments We thank our kind and patient consultant Hidenori Kiku for the Yoron date reported in this paper, and JK25 participants for their stimulating comments for our presentation. This study was supported in part by the NINJAL collaborative research project “General Research for the Study and Conservation of Endangered Dialects in Japan” and the ROIS (Research Organization of Information and Systems) Feasibility Study of Integration Project of Humanities and Sciences “Evolution of Japanese Archipelago People and Origin of their Languages and Cultures”. References Kibe, N. (eds.). 2016. General Research for the Study and Conservation of Endangered Dialects in Japan: Research Report on Yoron and Okinoerabu Dialect. NINJAL. Nakamoto, M. 1976. Ryukyu-hoogen on’in-no kenkyuu (“Study of the phonology of Ryukyuan dialects”). Hosei University Press. Nakanishi, K. and S. Tomioka. 2004. Japanese Plurals Are Exceptional. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13.2: 113-140. Niinaga, Y. 2010. Yuwan (Amami Ryukyuan). Shimoji, M. and T. Pellard (eds.) An Introduction to Ryukyuan Languages. 35-88. ILCAA. Niinaga, Y. 2015. A Grammar of Yuwan, a Northern Ryukyuan Language. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the University of Tokyo. van der Lubbe, G. and A. Tokunaga. 2016. Okinoerabu grammar. Heinrich, P., S. Miyara, and M. Shimoji (eds.) Handbook of Ryukyuan Languages. 345-378. Muton de Gruyter. Shimoji, M. 2017. A Grammar of Irabu. Kyushu University Press. Shigeno, H. and Shirata, R. 2016. Kitaryukyu amiami hougen-ni okeru yuuseisei-kaisou (“Animacy hierarchy in Amami, Northern-Ryukyuan”). Working Papers of Hiroshima University of Economics 38.4: 111-133. PLURAL FORMS IN YORON AND ADDRESS NOUNS IN RYUKYUAN LANGUAGES Shirata, R., M. Yamada, C. Ogino and Y. Takubo. 2011. Common Nouns as Proper Names in Kamikatetsu-Kikai Ryukyuan. Paper presented at the 21st Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference, Seoul National University. Suzuki, T. 1973. Kotoba-to Bunka (“Language and Culture”). Iwanami Shoten. Takubo, Y. 1997. Nihongo-no ninshou hyoogen (“Personal nouns in Japanese”). Takubo, Y. (ed.) Shiten-to Gengo Koudou (“Point of view and linguistic act”). 13-44. Kuroshio. Tsunoda, T. 2009. Sekai-no Gengo-to Nihongo (“Japanese and World’s Languages”). Kurosiho. Uwano, Z. 1999. Yoronjima higashiku hoogenno takei akusento taikei (“Takei-accent system of Yoron-higashi dialect). Kokugogaku 199: 188-174. Yamada, M. 2015. ‘Rajio taisoo daiichi Dunan-munui’-de oboeru Dunan-munui (Yonaguni-go) (“Learning Dunan-munui (Yonaguni-Ryukyuan) by Dunan version of Radio Calisthenics 1”). Karimata, S. (ed.) Ryukyu Shogo Kijutsu Bumpoo I (“Descriptive Grammars of Ryukyuan Languages I”): 231-245. University of Ryukyus. Yokoyama, A. 2014. Amami Okinoerabu hoogen-no hukusuu setsubiji (“On the plural markers in Okinoerabu-Amami-Ryukyuan”). Proceedings of Japanese Language Variation and Change Conference 2014. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics. 

Plural Forms in Yoron-Ryukyuan and Address Nouns in Ryukyuan Languages

https://repository.ninjal.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=2253&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1

Plural Forms in Yoron-Ryukyuan and Address Nouns in Ryukyuan Languages

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Academic Repository of the National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics / 国立国語研究所学術情報リポジトリ