thesis

SCREENING INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PROTEINS AND DISORDERED PEPTIDES BY A NOVEL COMPUTATIONAL METHOD

Abstract

Concerted interactions between proteins in cells form the basis of most biological processes. Biophysicists study protein–protein association by measuring thermodynamic and kinetic properties. Naively, strong binding affinity should be preferred in protein–protein binding to conduct certain biological functions. However, evidence shows that regulatory interactions, such as those between adapter proteins and intrinsically disordered proteins, communicate via low affinity but high complementarity interactions. PDZ domains are one class of adapters that bind linear disordered peptides, which play key roles in signaling pathways. The misregulation of these signals has been implicated in the progression of human cancers. To understand the underlying mechanism of protein-peptide binding interactions and to predict new interactions, in this thesis I have developed: (a) a unique biophysical-derived model to estimate their binding free energy; (b) a novel semi-flexible structure-based method to dock disordered peptides to PDZ domains; (c) predictions of the peptide binding landscape; and, (d) an automated algorithm and web-interface to predict the likelihood that a given linear sequence of amino acids binds to a specific PDZ domain. The docking method, PepDock, takes a peptide sequence and a PDZ protein structure as input, and outputs docked conformations and their corresponding binding affinity estimation, including their optimal free energy pathway. We have applied PepDock to screen several PDZ protein domains. The results not only validated the capabilities of PepDock to accurately discriminate interactions, but also explored the underlying binding mechanism. Specifically, I showed that interactions followed downhill free energy pathways, reconciling a relatively fast association mechanism of intrinsically disordered peptides. The pathways are such that initially the peptide’s C-terminal motif binds non-specifically, forming a weak intermediate, whereas specific binding is achieved only by a subsequent network of contacts (7–9 residues in total). This mechanism allows peptides to quickly probe PDZ domains, rapidly releasing those that do not attain sufficient affinity during binding. Further kinetic analysis indicates that disorder enhanced the specificity of promiscuous interactions between proteins and peptides, while achieving association rates comparable to interactions between ordered proteins

    Similar works