US Department of Justice

English

Golden Gate University School of Law: Digital Commons

Golden Gate University School of LawGGU Law Digital CommonsNational Institute of Justice Research in Brief Government Documents1-1993The Effect of Drug Testing in New OrleansUS Department of JusticeFollow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/nij-ribPart of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections CommonsThis Government Document is brought to you for free and open access by the Government Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has beenaccepted for inclusion in National Institute of Justice Research in Brief by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For moreinformation, please contact jfischer@ggu.edu.Recommended CitationUS Department of Justice, "The Effect of Drug Testing in New Orleans" (1993). National Institute of Justice Research in Brief. 42.https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/nij-rib/42HV 5824 .Y,I F61!! 1993 l>ep~rtment of Justice ~ ofJustice Programs nallnstitute of Justice Charles B. DeWitt, Director January 1993 The Effect of Drug Testing in New Orleans The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) initi-ated it~ Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) pro-gram in 1987, and in the intervening years it has come to be recognized a one of the Nation's leading indicators of drug use among arrestees in urban areas. By detect-ing and measuring drug use among those arrested and charged with criminal offen-ses, the DUF program sheds new light on an element long believed to drive criminal behavior. • -lew Orleans was one of the earliest and has been one of the most consistent prutici-pants in NIJ' s DUF program. The Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff's office joined the DUF program in 1987 and has never missed a quarterly data collection. The DUF program has been invaluable in docu-menting the relationship between drug use and crime and has proved what criminal justice professionals had long suspected-that drugs play at least an underlying role in most serious crime. From the Director NIJ's Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) pro-gram uses drug tests and interview data to estimate the levels and types of drugs used by booked arres tces in 24 urban sites across the Nation. The DUF program, rec gnized as a leading drug use indicator by the Office of National Drug Control Policy. has proved its worth. ln Hl inc>is, for example, success of the DUF program led to a St:ite-funded replication of the Chicago DUF cffon in seven counties. In Florida, DUF was the model for a new drug testing progrom e. tablished in Pinellas County and. mo ·t recently, in Maryland for drug testing of juveniles in Baltimore ounly. by Charles C. Foti, Jr. NIJ's DUF program has had a positive im-pact on law enforcement, citizens' under-standing of the extent of the drug problem, and Stale legislation aimed at curbing drug abu e. ln 1990, after years of rejecting all tax increase proposals- including those for p lice and tlre ervices-Orleans Par-ish voters approved a bond issue to finance a $34 million, 2,000-bed jail expansion program. In my opinion data on the per-centage of arrestees testing positive in our DUF program made the critical difference. Also, the DOF program was primarily re-sponsible for the State legislature 's enact-ment of law mandating drug testing for aU pretrial felony arrestees, requiring Lhe pres-ence of an assistant District Attorney at bai l reducLion hearings, the admission of drug possession as a factor in setting bail amounts, and a requirement that drug-use second offenders complete a drug treat-ment program. As a pructicaJ tool, DUF findjngs have shown I hal the use of cocuine among urrestees in many major cities remains high despite th general decline in cocaine use that has been noted among the overall pop-ulation. And DUF data have ~hown that arrestee drug test re ults have improved the nbiJi ty of local fliciuls to forecast drug-related community problems. Among the goals of the DUF program is to help local governments plan and develop programs within their communities to com-bat drug use and establish treatment pro-grams. Fostering cooperation between Federal, State, and local criminal justice agencies in the struggle against one of the Drugs and juvenile crime The incidence of juvenile crimes in New Orleans has substantially increased in re-cent years, and young persons are commit-ting more violent acts at an alarming rate. A January 1992 Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Update on Statistics reports that between 198 1 and 1990, arrests of juveniles for violent crime increased 29 percent in the United States. The rise in juvenile crime in New Orleans has reflected this national trend . NU's DUF program has focused the com-munity 's attention on the direct linkage be-tween drugs and crime, and this holds true for the juvenile offender population as well. According to the New Orlean Police Department, juvenile drug arrests in-creased by I 50 percent between the years 1985 and 1990-and a lmost 160 percent for arrest involving marijuana or cocaine use (exhibit 1). Nation's greatest social problems is an important pan of the DUF mission. This Research in Brief de ·cribes ways in which NIJ's DUFprogram has proved useful both t law enforcement in Orleans Purisl1, Louisiana-by informing I cal clti7.ens of lhe extent of the drug problem there-and 10 the Louisiumt State legisla-ture when framing laws lhal will aid in curbing drug abuse. charles .G9UYiiN GATE UNIVERSITY Director National Instit't}f~11e 1993 .... ~o- r ,,..:rre1B'lL LAW LIBRARY HV5824.Y68 F68 1993 Foti, Charles C The effect of drug testing ~~~~~~~~~~~~~111111111 in New Orleans How DUF Works DUF data are collected in booking facilities throughout the United States. For approximately 14 consecutive evenings each quarter, trained local staff obtain voluntary and anonymous urine specimens and interviews from a new sample of booked arrestees. In each site, approximately 225 males are sampled. In some sites, female ar-restees and juvenile arrestees/detainees are also sampled. More than 90 percent of the arrestees approached agree to be interviewed, and approximately 80 percent of those interviewed provide urine specimens. All urine specimens are sent to a cen-trallaboratory for analysis. The speci-mens are analyzed by EMJJ'l'M for 10 drugs: cocaine, opiates, marijuana, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines, methaqualone, propoxyphene, barbitu-rates, and amphetamines. All positive results for amphetamines are con-firmed by gas chromatography to eliminate positives that may be caused by over-the-counter drugs. For most drugs, the urine test can detect use in the. previous 2 to 3 days. Exceptions are marijuana and PCP, which can sometimes be detected several weeks after use. In 1990, the sheriff's office introduced the nationally known Project DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) to area schools. Now our office is pressing a "ju-venile agenda" that will include drug inter-vention programs for youngsters aged 7 through 1 0---the age when children are most receptive to drug intervention-and drug testing of juveniles on arrest. "Test free-Live free" Data collected through the DUF program in Orleans Parish were also responsible for the creation of "Drugs Off The Streets" (DOTS), a volunteer group formed to sup-port the anti-drug programs of such area officials as the sheriff, the district attorney, the city police department, district court judges, the clerk of court, the coroner, and State legislators. The DOTS motto is "Test free-Live free." DOTS promotes a comprehensive plan to reduce drug activity and crime in New Or-leans; it begins with drug testing for all persons arrested, includes initiatives against crack houses and drugs in public housing, and involves efforts to prevent the use of drugs by jail inmates. The DUF program in Orleans Parish When Orleans Parish began its voluntary urinalysis screening of non-drug-felony arrestees as part of the DUF program, 70 percent of male and female anestees showed the use of some illegal drug. Of these, 36 percent tested positive for co-caine, 55 percent for marijuana, and 22 percent for PCP. Two years later, in 1989, cocaine use had increased to the point where more than 60 percent of male anest-ees and more than half the females tested positive. And by 1992, figures showed that more female arrestees than males were us-ing cocaine. Marijuana use among both sexes had declined (exhibits 2 and 3). Nationwide, all DUF sites test males, some test females, some test juveniles, and some test all three categories. In Orleans Parish, we have consistently tested both male and female adult anestees charged ptimarily with nondrug crimes. (To guarantee a vari-Exhibit 1. Number of Juvenile Drug Arrests in New Orleans by Charge, 1985-1990 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199Q Distribution of cocaine 4 0 22 101 143 110 Distribution of marijuana 19 35 20 30 16 7 Possession of cocaine 7 6 26 71 162 172 Possession of marijuana 91 69 62 86 58 25 Source: New Orleans Police Department 2 ety of offenses in each sample of males, NIJ's DUF program is designed so that the number of arrestees charged with drug of-fenses is limited, while the inclusion of persons charged with serious non-drug of-fenses is emphasized; all female anestees are tested.) In its first 4 years as a DUF program site, Orleans Parish screened approximately 5,600 arrestees and continues to screen 250 males and 100 females each quarter. Determining release conditions In November 1991, our office began test-ing for marijuana, PCP, cocaine, and opi-ates for all pretrial release recommen-dations, DUF data having shown these drugs to be those most frequently abused in New Orleans. Forty-five percent of all those released tested positive for at least one drug, with cocaine most common at 31 percent. Marijuana usage tested at 22 per-cent. Opiates and PCP showed only negli-gible positive results. After testing, some 327 persons had their pretrial releases revoked; arrest warrants were issued for those failing to appear for retesting or for continuing to test positive. Showing positive results The good news in all these results lies in the way DUF statistics have alerted our cit-izens generally to the prevalence of drug use among those anested and charged with serious crimes. And while the declining rate of drug use that appeared to be emerg-ing in 1991 has not continued in 1992, the increases noted of late have taken place at a far lesser rate than in 1988 and 1989. New Orleans citizens, however, are more aware of drug use and how it fuels criminal activity-and law enforcement efforts to combat it-than ever before. £xhibit 2. Drug Use Among Male Booked Arrestees In New Orleans 1987 1988 1989 1990 - AnyOrug Marijuana Cocaine Note: Positive by urinalysis, quarterly results, 1987 through 1992. Source: National Institute of Justice/Drug Use Forecasting Program I 1992 Exhibit 3. Drug Use Among Female Booked Arrestees In New Orleans 80% ~------------------------------------------------------------~ - AnyOrug Marijuana - Cocaine Note: Positive by urinalysis, quarterly results, 1987 through 1992. Source: National Institute of Justice/Drug Use Forecasting Program 3 Charles C. Foti. Jr., ha.'l serv d as Crimi-nal Sheriff of Orlean.· Parish. Loui lana, since 1974. Earlier, he. was a htigation anomcy with the Federal Housing Au-thority, a trial attorney with the ew Orl~ Di trict Auomey' office and the Legal Aid Bureau, and an anomey for the New Orltans-.Police Department. Sheriff Fotl is a mcnnbcr of numerous profe, ional rganizations. among them the National Sheriff' AS! IX:iitli n and the American Bar Association. He i · an Advisory Board Member of NJJ' · Crime Abatement Committee and a member of the ew Orlean· Coordinating Counci1 on the Prevuntion of Drug U e and Treat· me.nt of Drug Abuse. Thi Research in Brief was adl\pted (and updatetl) from a report Sheriff Foti pre-pared for Uu! 1991 annual NlJ meeting of Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) site din:cton;. Points of view or opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the offici a] position or policies of Lhe U.S. Department.of Juslice. TheNatimrallnstiwre of Justice is a compo-nem oft he Office of Jusrice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assist-ance. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preven-tion, and the Office for Victims of Crime. NCJ 140090 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Washington, D.C. 20531 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 POSTAGE & FEES PAID l DOJ/NU Permit No. G-91 

The Effect of Drug Testing in New Orleans

https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&amp;context=nij-rib

The Effect of Drug Testing in New Orleans

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Golden Gate University School of Law: Digital Commons