ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law
Abstract
The distinction between tort and tort arising out of contract is becoming blurred where awards of punitive damages are sought. The article analyzes torts arising out of contract and the present approach of the Maryland courts to malice, the key element governing the recovery of punitive damages. The author suggests that the conduct, and not the technical term of the wrongful act, should dictate whether a plaintiff may recover punitive damages
