Stanley Hauerwas has achieved singular preeminence among theologians in the United States as a public intellectual. Writing on subjects from Christian ethics to law, pacifism, bioethics, and political philosophy, he has provided bountiful fodder for academics while managing to leave footprints in the general culture-he is surely one of very few theologians ever to appear on Oprah. Any new book bearing Hauerwas\u27 name is noteworthy, and the latest one doesn\u27t disappoint

Portier, William L.

English

University of Dayton

University of DaytoneCommonsReligious Studies Faculty Publications Department of Religious Studies2-21-2014Hauerwas on Hauerwas: Review of 'Approachingthe End: Eschatological Reflections on Church,Politics, and Life'William L. PortierUniversity of Dayton, wportier1@udayton.eduFollow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/rel_fac_pubPart of the Catholic Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Ethics and Political PhilosophyCommons, Other Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy ofReligion CommonsThis Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religious Studies at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion inReligious Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact frice1@udayton.edu,mschlangen1@udayton.edu.eCommons CitationPortier, William L., "Hauerwas on Hauerwas: Review of 'Approaching the End: Eschatological Reflections on Church, Politics, andLife'" (2014). Religious Studies Faculty Publications. 88.https://ecommons.udayton.edu/rel_fac_pub/88-32 William L. Portier ·Hauerwas on Hauerwas Approaching the End Eschatological Reflections on Church, Politics, and Life Stanley Hauerwas Eerdmans, $24, 269 pp. S tanley Hauerwas has achieved sin-gular preeminence among theo-logians in the United States as a public intellectual. Writing on subjects from Christian ethics to law, pacifism, bioethics, and political philosophy, he has provided bountiful fodder for aca-demics while managing to leave foot-prints in the general culture-he is surely one of very few theologians ever to appear on Oprah. Any new book bear-ing Hauerwas's name is noteworthy, and the latest one doesn't disappoint. In Approaching the End, the theologian revisits his earlier works, responding to critics while trying to write "in a differ-ent voice" and encouraging readers to "think twice about how they learned to think about how I think." Such convo-luted reflexivity signals the self-refer-ential character of this book. Hauerwas divides Approaching the End into three parts dealing respectivelywith Stanley Hauerwas eschatology, the church, and what he calls "the difficulty of reality." The voice of the late Mennonite theologian John Howard Yoder, Hauerwas's colleague at Notre Dame, haunts these pages. From Yoder Hauerwas learned that the estab-lishment of Christianity as a dominant religion, beginning with Constantine, turned Christians complacent, making . them forgetful of eschatology, and in-clining them to feel too much at home in the world. They lost their sense of living "between the times" of the rev-elation of the Lordship of Christ and his final manifestation. The coercion and killing for the Kingdom involved in: Christendom and subsequent confes-sional states led eventually to an almost complete "fusion of Christianity and nationalism"-a fusion that denied the lordship of Christ, whose own death established his dominion as "the Lamb who was slain" (Rev 5). . When Hauerwas talks about Con-stantine and Christendom, he isn't re-ally talking about the fourth century and the Middle Ages, but rather about America, "the great experiment in Prot-estant cultural formation." He inhabits a .historical-theological narrative that begins proximately with the Niebuhr brothers. This tradition addresses the task of responding theologically to "the end of Christendom"-that is, to the dwindling of the sodal and cultural hegemony of "nonsectarian" Protestant Christianity in the United States. Cath-olics have a serious stake in this project, since from the beginning they sought admission to Protestant America. Now that they're in, the end of Christendom is their problem too. Of two prevaiHng theological ap-proaches to the loss of Christendom, one-Hauerwas's-focuses on the life of the church and its witness in society, the other on Christianity's public role in shaping opinion and influencing politi-cal policy. Many maintain that the first alternative withdraws into the church and fails to engage America. But this is a mistake. Like his ahtitype, Reinhold Niebuhr, Hauerwas is a theologian to America. His America, however, has suffered the loss of Christendom, and in assessing this loss Hauerwas draws favorably and often on Brad Gregory's The Unintended Reformation, which ex-amined the ways in which the Protestant Reformation undermined religious be-lief and shaped the contours of modern secular individualism. While Hauerwas fears that "Catholicism in America may now be a form of Protestantistn," a mat-ter of denominational choice, he asserts that Christendom's end means at least "that the church is finally free to be a politics." What Hauerwas means by "church" here is not so easily explained. In fact, his language about the church tends to make Catholics crazy. Which church, they ask, where is it? Part II's chapter on Christian unity takes up these questions. In it Hauer-was responds to Lutheran theologian George Lindbeck's query: Why, given his concern with the unity of the church, has Hauerwas not participated in formal ecumenism? His response provides the most comprehensive account of his own "ambig~ous ecclesial status" and "pro-miscuous" ecclesial practice. A review cannot do justice to t~is extraordinarily honest account of Christian unity from the perspective of a self-described "high church Mennonite" and "congregation-alist with Catholic sensibilities." It ends with Yoder's account of the church's unity an4 catholicity as "necessarily local," and a close-to-bizarre yet plau-sible attempt to relate this to Anglican polity. Such is Hauerwas's church. But what is the world? Hauerwas takes questions Catholic theolo-gians treat under the rubric of nature and grace and sub'sumes them into the contrasting alternatives of church and world, with world essentially identified with the modern liberal state. Reject-ing as insufficiently eschatological Jean Porter's arguments on the nece.ssity of the doctrine of creation for natural law, he remains an admitted theocrat who has nevertheless renounced coercion in the name of]esus. This seeming deni-al of any rightful created autonomy to the worldly realms of culture and poli-. tics makes it easy for Catholic thinkers to dismiss, in the name of the good-ness of creation or the graced charac-ter of our world, Hauerwas's powerful case against liberal states. Why, he asks, don't parents who want their children to make up their minds about "reli-gion" let them make up their minds about America? What if Hauerwas is right-and right as a matter of fact, rather than on theo-logical grounds Catholic thinkers might reject? What if it is through historical contingency, rather than theological necessity, that modern states demand the human sacrifice of war as the price of their legitimacy? He would agree with the American Catholic bishops that the state cannot define the mis-sion of the church, but. its attempt to do so would not surprise him. He might argue that the bishops'· focus on mat-ters of sexuality and the family fulfills an unspoken concorda~ with liberal states, one that domesticates faith and makes it private. To be sure, the im- · petus for public political protest has shriveled. Philip ~errigan expr~ssed his conscientious objection to war by pouring blood on draft-board records, hammering warhead nose cones, and submitting to imprisonment.·Today's American Catholic bishops protest the state's attempts to define the missions of the church's hospitals and schools with lawsuits and fortnights for freedom. If Hauerwas had a fortnight for freedom, its agenda would include COfl:Scientious objection to war. Alas,· he doesn't men-tion abortion. Hauerwas recognizes the powerful instinct of the state to swallow churches whole, and appeals to the resources that the faithful have to resist being swal-lowed. When Hitler sought to create a German Christian Church, Karl Barth's Barmen Declaration helped midwife the Confessing Church, with its commit-ment to the Lordship of Christ alone. In an earlier century, when Napoleon wanted to make the church a depart-ment of the French state, Catholics turned to the pope as embodying the transnational unity of Christ's church. A Protestant, Hauerwas appreciates the "polit'ical importance of the papacy," but he worries that An:ierican Catholics do not. Along with Mennonites, Catholics have transnational resources, unavail-able ·to other 'Christians, for resisting omnivorous states. Hauerwas challenges Catholics in the United States to ask if they have become just another liberal Protestant denomination in thrall to American nationalism. Do they re-ally get the catholicity of their own church? Hauerwas wants Catholics to be Catholic. The stumbling block that often keeps Catholics from taking this challenge seriously is Hauerwas's star~ church-world dichotomizing. He tackles this difficulty at the beginning of Part III . "B · n l' " ful fl m earmg .ea 1ty, a power re ec-tion onJ. M. Coetzee's novel Elizabeth Costello. Comparing himself to Coe-tzee's character-"Like Costello, I am old and trapped by a track record whose defense can stop thought from meeting . the demands to say as best one can what is true"-Hauerwas acknowledges that his emphasis on the centrality of Christ has identified him as "one whose strong theological voice tends to overwhelm an appropriate acknowledgment of what it means to. be human." This essay raises i,rs-r~ ... PRAY ... IA-K~ A-C-llON ! I You can help create hope and opportunity by using and sharing with others the 2014 Lenten Prayers for Hungry Peop le. A 6 x 9 inch "table tent" includes scripture readings (from Year A of the Common Lectionary), prayers, and actions for each of the five weeks of Lent as well as Holy Week. You may order multiple copies-free-for distribution to members of your church or community. Lent begins with Ash Wednesday on March 5, so order your free table tents today. To order Lenten Prayers for Hungry People visit: www.bread.org/l~nt or call toll-free 1-800-822-7323 e1 breadfortheworld H A V E FA I T H. E N D H U N G ER. 425 3rd Street SW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20024 iii www.bread.org :;r ~ 33 questions Catholics might view in terms of nature and grace. "How," Hauerwas asks himself, "can I think consistently with theologians like John Howard Yoder and Karl Barth and at the same time learn from philosophers like Lud-wig Wittgenstein, Iris Murdoch, and Cora Diamond?" He approaches the question of what it means to be human via analytic phi-losopher and Wittgenstein interpreter Cora Diamond's notion of the "diffi-culty of reality" in naming aspects oflife that defy explanation but with which, whether in pain or astonishment, we must nevertheless live. For Hauerwas, the intractability of another's pain, as set forth in Coetzee's novel, exemplifies the "difficulty of reality." To'this perspective he brings Yoder's account, in a 1988 ad-dress to the Society of Christian Ethics, of the difficulty of being a Christian. (Hauerwas misses an opportunity to treat, in Yoder's own terms,· the pain and division caused among Mennon-ites by continuing allegations of sexual misconduct on the part of Yoder-a disappointing omission, given his book's determined honesty.) Part Ill's remain-ing essays, on habit and on questions of theology and medicine, deepen Hauer-was's answer to the question of what it means to be human. In writing Approaching the End, Hau-erwas tells us that he set out to surprise us with the "tone if not the substance" of his reflections. Readers may judge whether he has turned into "an old lion who has learned to eat straw," or has simply continued to ask hard questions and offer surprising answers. Either way, such an engaging intellectual retrospec-"" tive by a world-class theologian deserves ~ . wide readership, both among those ....,~ committed to the Lordship of Christ t, and the continuing life of the church, ~ and among those simply interested in ~ what it means to be human. • ~ -;a William L. Portier is Mary Ann Spearin ~ Chair of Catholic Theology at the Uni-§ versity of Dayton: His most recent book is E Divided Friends, Portraits of the Roman E Catholic Modernist Crisis in the United 0 U States (Catholic University Press). 34 

Hauerwas on Hauerwas: Review of \u27Approaching the End: Eschatological Reflections on Church, Politics, and Life\u27

https://ecommons.udayton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&amp;context=rel_fac_pub

Hauerwas on Hauerwas: Review of \u27Approaching the End: Eschatological Reflections on Church, Politics, and Life\u27

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Dayton