The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its second issue of the 2010–2011 academic year

Oroszlan, Francis C.

English

University of Richmond

Richmond Journal of Law and TechnologyVolume 17 | Issue 2 Article 12011Introduction: contains Cover, Table of Contents,Letter from the Editor, and MastheadFrancis C. OroszlanUniversity of RichmondFollow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/joltPart of the Computer Law Commons, Evidence Commons, and the Intellectual Property LawCommonsThis Introduction is brought to you for free and open access by UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Richmond Journal ofLaw and Technology by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contactscholarshiprepository@richmond.edu.Recommended CitationFrancis C. Oroszlan, Introduction: contains Cover, Table of Contents, Letter from the Editor, and Masthead, 17 Rich. J.L. & Tech (2011).Available at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/jolt/vol17/iss2/1 RICHMOND Journal of Law and Technology The first exclusively online law review.  VOLUME XVII, ISSUE 2, WINTER 2011  ARTICLES  5.   The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Under the Federal Rules of Evidence   Jonathan D. Frieden & Leigh M. Murray  6.   Teacher Cell Phone Searches in Light of Ontario v. Quon  Joseph O. Oluwole  7.  Busting Blocks: Revisiting 47 U.S.C. § 230 to Address the Lack of Effective Legal Recourse for Wrongful Inclusion in Spam Filters  Jonathan I. Ezor Richmond Journal of Law & Technology       Volume XVII, Issue 2   TABLE OF CONTENTS  LETTER FROM THE EDITOR  MASTHEAD  ARTICLES  5.   THE ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE  By Jonathan D. Frieden & Leigh M. Murray  6.   TEACHER CELL PHONE SEARCHES IN LIGHT OF ONTARIO V. QUON  By Joseph O. Oluwole   7.  BUSTING BLOCKS: REVISITING 47 U.S.C. § 230 TO ADDRESS THE LACK OF EFFECTIVE LEGAL RECOURSE FOR WRONGFUL INCLUSION IN SPAM FILTERS  By Jonathan I. Ezor  Richmond Journal of Law & Technology  Volume XVII, Issue 2 February 2, 2011   Dear Readers:  The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its second issue of the 2010–2011 academic year.   In pursuit of our mission to address the crossroads of law and technology, it is the Journal’s goal to produce scholarly analysis that both identifies and resolves issues where the law and technology intersect.  In our first article, “The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Under the Federal Rules of Evidence,” Jonathan Frieden and Leigh Murray explore the current state of electronic evidence, structuring their article as a practitioner’s “How To” guide for admitting electronic evidence in Federal courts.  In a similar vein, Joseph Oluwole’s article, “Teacher Cell Phone Searches in Light of Ontario v. Quon,” examines the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Ontario v. Quon.  Oluwole applies the Court’s ruling to teacher cell phone searches in public schools, and calls for the application of two existing approaches to ensure the effectiveness of a search without violating the sanctity of an individual’s right to privacy.   Our final article, “Busting Blocks: Revisiting 47 U.S.C. § 230 to Address the Lack of Effective Legal Recourse for Wrongful Inclusion in Spam Filters,” examines the negative, and relatively unknown, side of spam filtering, which leaves e-mail senders who are wrongfully accused of spamming technologically stranded with little to no remedy.  Author Jonathan Ezor begins his article with an outline of the process by which spam filters and block lists unjustly label an e-mail sender as a spammer.  Then, after identifying the disastrous consequences that result from such an unwarranted designation, Ezor articulates the need to adopt certain characteristics of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as a means to rectify occurrences of improper spam blocking or filtering.  On behalf of the entire Journal staff, I extend our deepest gratitude and sincerest thanks for your continued readership and support.  The Journal also appreciates the continuing support and assistance of the faculty and Richmond Journal of Law & Technology  Volume XVII, Issue 2 staff at the University of Richmond School of Law, most especially the guidance we receive from our faculty advisors, Professors Melanie Holloway and Christopher Cotropia.    We are confident you will enjoy our second issue.  As always, your comments and suggestions are welcome at jolt@richmond.edu.  Best regards,  Francis C. Oroszlan Editor-in-Chief    Richmond Journal of Law & Technology Volume XVII, Issue 2  2010-2011 EDITORIAL BOARD  Francis C. Oroszlan Editor-in-Chief   Matthew D. Powers Colleen Koch Chris Jones  Managing Editor Executive Editor Manuscripts Editor   Jason E. Fisher Stephen J. Rancourt Hamilton Garnett  Articles Editor Annual Survey Editor Symposium &    Solicitations Editor   Wiley Grandy David Quinn Jesse Roche  Copy Editor Technical Editor Notes & Comments     Editor   ASSOCIATE EDITORS    Scott Bergeson Christine Cogbill Michele Fanney   Anthony Holman Ian Lambeets Lauren Palmer   Lindsey Strachan Jim Tartaglia Jacob Tingen   SENIOR STAFF  Connellee Armentrout Sam Bernier Sue Chan David Eberline Beth Gould  Andrew Green Bo Greenwood Joel Hermsdorfer Diana Koch-Blackman Luke Mitchell Nikki Najmyar Tyler Rhodes Jessica Smith Ben Spence Bryant Thomas   FACULTY ADVISORS  Melanie Holloway  Christopher Cotropia  

Introduction: contains Cover, Table of Contents, Letter from the Editor, and Masthead

https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1336&context=jolt

Introduction: contains Cover, Table of Contents, Letter from the Editor, and Masthead

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Richmond