Sheff v. O\u27Neill: Weak Desegregation Remedies and Strong Disincentives in Connecticut, 1996-2008

Abstract

In 1996, as the Supreme Court and the nation were retreating from school integration, Connecticut\u27s judicial system was advancing with Sheff V. O\u27Neill. This chapter explores the case and it aftermath, as the judicial system stalled the process of desegregation and then explores and analyzes the results of Sheff I, a four year legal settlement that produced limited results. The case study continues on to explore the next legal remedy, Sheff II, and throughout, looks at our understanding of school desegregation policy by discussing what this voluntary plan has not yet achieved in Connecticut

    Similar works