Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided and dual antiplatelet therapies in acute coronary syndrome.

Abstract

BackgroundThe choice of antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is complicated: Ticagrelor and prasugrel are novel alternatives to clopidogrel, patients with some genotypes may not respond to clopidogrel, and low-cost generic formulations of clopidogrel are available.ObjectiveTo determine the most cost-effective strategy for dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS.DesignDecision-analytic model.Data sourcesPublished literature, Medicare claims, and life tables.Target populationPatients having percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS.Time horizonLifetime.PerspectiveSocietal.InterventionFive strategies were examined: generic clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and genotyping for polymorphisms of CYP2C19 with carriers of loss-of-function alleles receiving either ticagrelor (genotyping with ticagrelor) or prasugrel (genotyping with prasugrel) and noncarriers receiving clopidogrel.Outcome measuresDirect medical costs, quality-adjusted life years(QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).Results of base-case analysisThe clopidogrel strategy produced$179 301 in costs and 9.428 QALYs. Genotyping with prasugrel was superior to prasugrel alone, with an ICER of$35 800 per QALY relative to clopidogrel. Genotyping with ticagrelor was more effective than genotyping with prasugrel ($30 200 per QALY relative to clopidogrel). Ticagrelor was the most effective strategy($52 600 per QALY relative to genotyping with ticagrelor).Results of sensitivity analysisStronger associations between genotype and thrombotic outcomes rendered ticagrelor substantially less cost-effective ($104 800 per QALY). Genotyping with prasugrel was the preferred therapy among patients who could not tolerate ticagrelor.LimitationNo randomized trials have directly compared genotyping strategies or prasugrel with ticagrelor.ConclusionGenotype-guided personalization may improve the cost-effectiveness of prasugrel and ticagrelor after percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS, but ticagrelor for all patients may bean economically reasonable alternative in some settings