Scanning electron microscopy showed that the myrmecophilous cricket, Myrmecophila manni Schimmer, retains many structural features common to typical gryllids and has few of the morphological features often associated with myrmecophily. However, the mouth parts, particularly the labrum and epipharynx, are highly modified for strigilation and trophallaxis. The structure of the ovipositor is unique in that it can expand greatly to permit the passage of large eggs. This cricket also differs from typical gryllids in having stemmata instead of compound eyes, a feature probably related to its life inside dark ant nests where it does not need good vision. Behavioral, rather than morphological, attributes are probably more important in adapting the crickets for life with ants

Akre, Roger D.

Henderson, Gregg

Scanning electron microscopy showed that the myrmecophilous cricket, &lt;i&gt;Myrmecophila manni&lt;/i&gt; Schimmer, retains many structural features common to typical gryllids and has few of the morphological features often associated with myrmecophily. However, the mouth parts, particularly the labrum and epipharynx, are highly modified for strigilation and trophallaxis. The structure of the ovipositor is unique in that it can expand greatly to permit the passage of large eggs. This cricket also differs from typical gryllids in having stemmata instead of compound eyes, a feature probably related to its life inside dark ant nests where it does not need good vision. Behavioral, rather than morphological, attributes are probably more important in adapting the crickets for life with ants

Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia

J. E:\TO~1()1. Soc BRI"I COLLI~IBI ,\ ti 3 ( 19S6). DI.C 31. 1986 MORPHOLOGY OF MYRMECOPHILA MANNI, A MYRMECOPHILOUS CRICKET (ORTHOPTERA:GRYLLIDAE)I GREGG H ENDERSOI\ and ROGER D. AKRE Departmcnt of Enlomolog) Washington State Univcr!>ity Pullman. WA 99164-6432 ABSTRACT Scanning electron microscopy showed that the myr lllccoph il ous cricket. MI'nIlCC0l'ili/1i 1I/(lIlIli Schimmer. retains many structural features COlllmon to typical gryllid, and ha, reV. of the Illorphological Icatures often associated with myr111ccophily. Howeve r. the 1110uth parts. particularl ) the labrum and epipharynx. arc highly 1110dified for strigila tion and trophallaxis. The structurc of the ovipm.itor is unique in that it can expand greatly to permit the passage of large eggs. This c ri cket al so dillers from typical gryll ids in having stemmata instead ofcol1lpound eyes. a feature probably re lated to its life inside dark ant nests where it docs not need good vision. Behavioral. rather than morphological. attributes arc probabl\ more important in adapting the crickets for life with ant s. INTRODUCTION Four species ofM."nlll'col'ili/a Latrei lle. small C .3-4.0 111m ). apterous cr ickets. arc found in North America (Hebard 1920). Ml'rlllccopili/a are the only l11yrmecophi -lous cricket> known. Inquil ines. especially myrme-cophiles. often share a number of characteristics that enahle thel11 to li ve in the hostile but energy- ri ch environ-ment of the ant nest. Often these adaptations include a myrmecoid body shape. a hard cuticle. reduction of certain appendages. and the use of glandular secre tions appeasing to the ants. The degree of morpholog ical change in myrmccophiles is prohably directlv related to thc dcgree with which th ey have integrated into the colony (Wilson 197 1). M l'rllll'c0l' il i/a llloll lli Schimmel' reta ins many of th~ st ructu ra l fcalllres cOll1monly found in the fam il y Gryll idae and docs not possess many of the adapta-tions often associa ted with myrlllecophil y. The purpose of thi s study was to cxamine the morpho-logical leatu res of M . 1III/IIIIi and to relate these li nd ing to the crickets' relationsh ip wi th thcir ant hosts . I\IATERIAL AND I\IETHODS Eight M. /lllIlIlIi were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Livc specimens were fixed in 2 '1r osmiull1tctroxide (OsO) for I h. and thcn 39; glutaraldc-hyde for 2 h at 4 °C. Standard procedures for SEM preparation followed using an Omar SPC 1500 cr itical point dryer. Hummer V gold coaler and EPTEC SEM. equipped with 55 PIN li lill. Ficld and laboratory observa-tion ofM. lIIalllli behavior we re madc to support interpre-tations of the fun ctional morpholog~ re\ calcd by SEM . l S(l~Il!lril' P..lPl,'f 'umtx-r 70XS. \\a .. ,l-lln~l\)n S[:l1L' Lnl\~r ... It~. rnlk~,,-' \11 .A,~n .. :ult lJn.· .IIlJ HOllw EUlll\lIllll'''' RL· :-'c."~rl·h (\'1111.'1". PUIlIll.1Il \\",d.. \."1 111 JUl'lt'd unJl'I" prlllC'L' \ (X)J-RESUI:rs AND DISCUSSION Sensory Apparatus Thc SEM showed that M. 1III/IIIIi has morphological features cOllllllonly found in the rami I) Gryllidae . How-cver. some pecula rities of M. 1IIllllili n1<l) bc adaptations to myrmccophily. The antennae of M. IIWlllli arc as long as the body and have a proportionate ly large scape. The row of hairs along thc scape Illay help the cricket detec t the source of a stimulus (F ig. I). That is. when cr ickets arc in a fixed position it can be del110nstrated that they will follow a visual object with their antcn nae . The hairs on the scapes signal the ang le the antennae arc dellected. helping pinpoint the stimulus . The scnsilla of the anten-nac occlir in a repetitive t~lshi on along the 4-4- + !-.cgmcnts. NUn1croll !'. rdi fo rm hairs CO\'cr the en tire surface or lhe antennae and probably perce ive sound or respond to air displacement vibrations (Haskell 1960) (Fig . 2). Coe lomic pegs. considered to serve a chemosensory function. occur at the rate of about I per segmcnt. The cerci. like the antennae. arc la rge in M . IIIOlllli (Fig 2) . Thev arc l"uall) held awaY from the body giv ing the nickel a larger suriace arca for perception. Their entire surlace is covered with va rious-siLed trichoid scns illa. Thc thinner hairs . which are also the longest. are bem by thc slightest breeze. Cercal hairs of grasshoppers rc;.pond to sound freq uencics of 30- 1000 Hz and can be stimulatcd by ai r moving at4 cm/sec (Ha"kell. 1961). Rcduction of appendages is common fo r myrme-cnphiles. However. M. II/Willi rctai ns its elaborate sensing struc tures. suggesting a beneficial funct ion in the ant-cricket relationship. Behavioral studies ,ho\\' that Ml'r-1I/1'copili/o arc often allacked b) the host fWhee ler 1900 . Hencierson 1985). However. rare l) is a cricket caught off guard and captured by an ant . The antennae and ce rc i probably warn the cricket of approaching ants. The cricket also uscs it ;. antennae [0 mil11ic thc conspeci fi c antcn nation used by ant s prececd ing mutual grooming J. Er-:TOMOI . Soc BR IT COI.UM BI A R~ ( 19Ro). DEC ~ I. 1986 Fig. I . Highly ma~nifi ed SEM show ing scape (sc) of the an tenna and stel11 mata (stc) . Note the row of ha irs along the scapc. F i ~. 2. Typical arrangemcnt of sensory hairs that are found on eac h ofthe44 + segment s of the antenn<lc. The hair in the centre is a coelomic peg. and its chel11osensory function is well doclImcnted. The tri choid hairs surrounding the peg art: Illostl y tac tik ~c nsing hair~ . J. EI\TO.\ IOL Soc BRI T. COLl i ~I 81 ,\ ~n I I LJK6 1. DEC -' I. I LJK6 Fig. 3. Diagram , howing the oriclllatH)J1 of Ihe cc rn" to the re,t of the hod y. Two major Iype, of hair' arc located here . The lOp in .,cn shows filamentou s hairs that detect soun d or vihration . The,e hairs arc located oYer moSi of the ccreal surhlCc. The second t\ pe of hair. loca ted o nlv along the tir,ttwo hasal ,egillenb. arc hal loon hair' whie!. he lp Ihe in,eel orient to gravit~ (Bi, hof 197-+). Fig. -+. The lCeding mechanism or M. I//(///l l i is modified to increasc the c nic icncy olliS keding habilS . Lahrum (lhn . Ephiphal) nx (cphy). Galea (ga). 60 J. ENTOMOL SOC BRIT. COLlIMRI ,\ X3 ( I YR6). D EC ~ I . 19X6 Fig. S. SEM shows the top of the head . ce rv ix. and pro no tul11 of M. !/I III I II i. The a rrow po int s to a s ing le hair scalc. its se rrated natu re is show n. g rea tly en la rged. to the right. Fig. 6. SEM revea ls the ex pandi ng na ture of the ov ipos itor of M. !/IanJli. Th is a ll ows for ov ipos itio n of large eggs. The fi rst valvul ae (I vi v) can spread apart and the spira led egg guide (e.g.) can unspi ra l, inc reasi ng the total surrace area . The thi rd val vu lae (3 vlv) a re fu seu and wrap around the sc le roti zed ti ps of the second va lvu lae (2 vlv). .I. E:--: I()~I()I Soc BIU! COLl \1 KIA ~:; ( 19N6 J. DI.c. .\ I. 1<)X6 6t and trophallaxi,. The length of thc al1!ennae aids the cr icket in mimicking thc:-,c ~ignaJ:.. \\ hich a ll ()w~ til l' crlc!-"ct. in a ~cn~~, (() para~i t i/c ib ho~l. In addition. oh~cr\'alion~ ~ho\\ that M. JIll/III/; u .... t:\ ib antennae and ce rci in elahorate di~play~ during mating and intra~peci­fi c agg rc~ .... inn (Hcndcr .... on 19 ~5). Cereal shahing ha .... a 1 ... 0 bec n obse rved In I'ield crickcb a nd Illay aid in di rcCling tlw lcillaic into proper rosition for copul at ion (Alexander 1961 ) The cyes llf M. 1I/ll1111i arc nm cO fllpound. '" in 1ll0,t cr icket'. hut are comr(l,cd of I R to 20 , tcnlfllata located ahove each anlenna. Vi,ual pe rception f()r thi , type of eyc i, believed to be ofa co,u',e Ill,,,aic that can only di flcren-ti ate ,hares and ,harpl~ cont rast ing images (Dc thicr 19·n. Me)er Rocho\\' 197-+). Morphological regres, ion of the eye, is a"ociatcu wi th Ill) rmecorhily (Wilson 1971). and although ,temmata arc not a rcgre"cd form of compound c)e. the cnd rcs ult i, much the ,amc. Fi nc visua l acui t) i, probabl y not ncce"ar) since thc cricke ts spc nu most of th ei r li\'es inside a dad, ne,1. LOl:O Jll otory Apparatus M. II/allili arc both ,a ltatoria l ano cur,orial. thu s they re tain thc jumping and running abilitie, typ ica l o f G ry ll i-dac. With M. 1IIIIIIIIi retaining se ns illa to allow for pe rcep-ti on of a pproach ing anls. it follows th at the) ,hould re tain the ir ' pced and jumping abilit \ to alk)\\ for escarc. Wheeler ( 1900) belic\·cd tha t the complicated fig-zag path 01 M l'nllcclI!,hi/li was the major l;lCtor in a llowing thcm to li\e \\ it h anls. OINo' rvati o ns in the l aborator~ revealed th at M. 1Illlllili aho retain, the ahi lit y tn lo,e a hind leg if ,eized by an an t. Stei ncr ( 196R) was thc first to recognize thi~ ~Idaptat ioll in field cr i ckL' t ~ a~ we ll i.I~ ~() Ill e grasshoppers a, a possihle mean, of ",cape. M. 1I/IIIIIIi appeared 10 function norlllall) with a leg Illis,ing and lived as long a, intact Mrnlll'c(j/Jhi/a (He nderson 1985). Feeding A pparat", The mouth pan, of M. 1IIlIIIIIi arc of the general oni1or-tc rall t} pC' \\ ith a large numbe r of chc/1lo ..... cn...,nr) ~c n~i ll a on the tir' of th e lab ia l a nd ma\il la n pa lpi. Hl)\\cver. SEM revealed tha t the cpiphar) nx and lahrum arc lllodi fied in M. 1IIIIIIII i The lab ru m i, reduccd an d th e cpipharyn\ protrudc's from heneath it in finger-like pro-lec tion,. fused pro\imall) and ,Iightl~ sera rate distalh (Fig . -+ 1. Epirhar~ ngeal rrojectilHl, ofthi, type arc some-time, fo und IJ1 aquatic in,cct, (Haliplidae. Cllicopte ra. rer, . ob,cn. 1 and arc probahl~ meu lor ,craping food I()o~(' Irom \arinu:-. ~lIh~ l ratc~ . M . lJIaf/lli ... trigilate an'" and engage thclll in lr()pha l~ la\i,. The brush-l ike erirharyn\ appears to be a adapta-tion for taking this lood, The protruding eplphar) n\ Innea,c, the surface arc; that comes In contact \\ ith the ball of liquid rcgurgitated b) the anI. Thc ,urface ten,ion of the liqUid i, e<l,il) broken and adhere, to the mouth pan, o f the cr icket Also. the manoible, are recc"cd behind the labrum. an o when the cricket scrape , th e integument of the ant the eriphar\'nx m,,) act as a seoor. The galeae . u,cd to pull food in to th e ma ndibular arca. have a ret icu lated surLice and arc posi tioned to sw<:er an) panicle, scrared by the ma ndible, inlO th e epi phary nx. Highl) lllodified mouth rarts abo occur among th o~c inquili nl'~ which arc \\el l intcgrated In{() ant co lonies (c'.g .. Psdaphidae. Akrc and Hill 19131. Odor Camouflage M. lllill illi arc all ac~ed b) a nt s. bu t the) arc abo found at thL very heart of the ant nesl. the brood chamber ( He nder,on 1985 I. Onc mea ns by which Ihe cr icket allain, en trance int o the chamber i, through behavioral mimicry. Odor eamon ll age may be another mcan". M. lIIillllli arc covered with ,errated sealc, on the dorsum of th e hcad. thora\. and abdomen th at lIlay be used to acq uire odors (Figs. 5). Acquisition ofthc nl',t odor b) my rlllccophile, through mechani ca l mea ns is COlllmon. Host odors are transferred by hi sterid beetles a"oc iatcd with ar my ant s by rubb ing their t ibial bru,hes on the ants (Rettenllleyc r 1961. Akrc 19(8) . The Illyrmccophilous bectle M r nll('<"l/ph"di ll .\ ('x("(/\'IIlico/li,\ (Bl a nc hard) (Scarabae idae) has rcce ntl y heen found 10 acquire spe-e ie'-' peci fi e hydrocarbons from it, host by contacl. b) grooming behavior. and by i n gc~ti()n of r~gurg.ita tcd ant post pharyngcal g land cnntents (Vander 1..,1cer and Wojick 19X~). The ,erratcd ,cale, on M. IIltllllli might scrape pa rtic le, oil the walls a nd galleries of the ant ne st during the cricket's tra\c1s. Wheeler ( 1900) repon ed that the wall, and gallerie, of ant ne, t, arc co\ered with cu t ic ular lipids deposited b) the con,tant travcl or the ants. Al -though attack~ h~ an l ~ on thei r cricket glle~b ~lIggcsllhat h"'t hydrocarbo n acquisition is not full y cflective . acqui -s it ion o f e\·en a sma Ii amount of h",t hydrocarbons may he lp in the c ri cket\ l'ommcnsal existence . Reproductive .~ lllrph() l og.' Schimmcr ( 1909 ) found that the m' irmitor of M\TII/('-("1I!,hi/" has unique aniculatillit as a rcsult of e longation <.Ind fusinn oj' th \~ eigh th and ninth Icrga rlur~t1I ~. Gorok hov (19RO) suggestcd th at the co lulll ll gavc th e (\\ ip",itnr the ahilit) to e\tcnd and retract: a necc"an abilit\ si nce the in ,eCl (lVipo,Slts eggs nearl y one-t hi rd a s long a, its bod) . SEM ,howed that the mClllbranou, cgg guide i, 'ri raled (Fig 6) . Thc ,pirallng permit, expansi on of' the egg gdid~. and \\~ ~uggC\t that th is abo is ar. adapialillll for lay ing propLlrtionatcl)' large cgg\. 1\:-, til ... egg Ira\'cl~ dtw, n the egg gu iue the :-.piral opcn~ lip gi\'lIlf, the egg the area it needs v.:hiIL ~Idl providing a :-,mooth patl",·a\ Summar. ,\1. 11/(111111 i, morrhologicall) \\cll c4u ipned for myr-mec·orhih. The antennae and c~rci are dcnsch c1.lthell \\ ith ,cn,or) hair, that qui<'~I~ detcct approaching allis This carl~ warning s),stel11. Cllurlcd with the rropcnslt\ <lithe crickets 10 run in 7ig-7ag rallerns and tOlumn \\ hen c,earc b~ running is impossible. en"lrc, that tC\\ cr ickets arc caught h) ant,. In addillon. th e large h in J legs rcadd\ detach \\ hen Ihe) arc ,eizcd b~ allacking al1l '. and cncl--cis lacking onc hind kg are apparenth able to Cl)J1 tinuc tn I'unct ion norlllall) . Thc,e ,Iighimorrhologicallllodifica-62 J . ENTOMOL SOc. BR IT. COL.UMB IA 83 (1986). DEC. 3 I . 1986 tions. coupled with appropr ia te behavior. perm it these cricke ts to integrate into the co lonies of their host ants without much difficul ty. Also imponant is their small size (2.3 t04.0 mm) which makes them difficult 10 catch even with a determined allack by an ant. Well integratecl mynnecophiles freq ucntly have g reatly modifieclmouth pans to take advantage of food within the ant colony. and these crickets arc no exception . Their brush-type epipharynx probably helps sweep food into the bucca l cav it y when the c ri cket is stri g ilating an ant. During trophallaxi s the large and irregu lar surface of th e epipharynx may aid in the transfer of the regurgitated liquid . Much more important ly. it appea rs that the mim-icking of recognition s ignal s of the ants cnables the cricket to tap a nearl y unlimited resource. the contents of the crops of forag ing workers. These small crickets have used a mi nimum of morpho-logical adaptations and a maximum of behavioral mod if i -cations to integrate themselves in to co lon ies of the ir host ants. The number of crickets in th ese co lonics (o ne nest harbored over 300 cric kets) suggests that they are at least as successful as myrmcco id inquilines . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We sincerely thank E.P. Call s and P.c. Schroeder fo r advice on many aspec ts of thi s project . We arc gra te ful to J. Jenkins. J. We ll s. and M.G. Means for ass is tance in coll ec ting cri ckets. We also thank E. P. CallS. P.c. Sch-roeder. R.W. Sites . and R .S. Zack for cr itically rev iewing the manuscri pt and for making numerous suggesti ons for improvement. A. Mudge provided untiring technica l as-sistance in the fina l prepa ration of the manuscript. REFERENCES CITED Akre . R. D. 1968. The behavior of Euxl'l/isll'r and Pull ·il/isler . histerid bect les associatcd with army ant s (Fo rmicidae: Ec itonini ). Pa n-Pac En!. 44 : 87- 101 Akre. R.D .. and Will. B. Hill . 1973. Bchavior of Adml/!'s {(Iv/ori. a myrmccoph ilous bectle assoc iated with LlISillS silkaellsis in the Pacific Northwest. (Coleoptera : Psclaph idac: Hymenoptera . Formicidae) . J. Kansas En t. Soc . 46: 526-536. Alexande r. R. D. 1961 . Aggress ivcness. terr ito riality and sexua l behavio r in field c ri ckets (Onhoptera: Gry ll idae). Bchav iour 17: 130-225. Bishof. H. F. 1974. The clu b-shaped sensill a on thc cc rci of Gr.l'lIus !Jill/lleu/mus as g rav ity reccptors (Ort h .. Gry ll idae). J.Comp. Phys io!. 98: 277-288 . Dethier. Y.G. 1943. T he dioptric apparatus oflater,,1 oce lli . II. Visual capaci ties of the oce llus. J. Cc ll. Com po Phys io!. 22: 115- 126. Gorok hov. A. Y. 1982. Morphologica l pec ul iari t ies of cricke ts of the ge nera Mynllecophi/us Bcnh . and Erell/ogryl/ode> Chop. and syste matic position of the trihe Bothr iopy laci ni (O rthoptera. Gry llidae). Entomo!' Obnz r. 59: 287-293. Haskell. P.T. 1960. The sensory equipme nt of the migrato ry locust. Symp. Zoo!. Soc. Lond . 3: 1-23. Haske ll . P.T. 196 1. Insec ts sounds. H . F. and G. Witherby: London. 189 pp. Hebard. M. 1920. A rev ision of Nort h Ame rican spec ies of the gen us Mynllecophi /a (O rthoptera: Gryllidac; Myrmecoph ilinae). Trans. Am. E11lomo!. Soc. 49 : 9 1- 111 . Henderson. G. 1985. The Biology of Mvrll/ecophi /a II/al/lli Schimmer (Onhoptcra: Gryllidae ). M.S . Thesis. Washing-ton Statc Uni versity. 83 pp . Mcye r-Rochow. Y.B. 1974. Structu re and function of the larva l eye of the sawfl y. Perga. J. Insec t Phys io!. 20 : 1565-159 1. Rettcn meyer. C. W. 1961 . Arthropods associated with Neotrop ical army an ts wit h a rev iew of the bchavior of these ants (Art hropoda: Form ic idae: Dorylinae). Ph. D. Dissenation, Uni v. Kansas. 605 pp. Schimmer. F. 1909. Beitrag zu ei ner Monograph ic der G ryllodcengatung Mynllecophi/a Latr. Ze itschr. Wissensch. Zoo!. 93: 409-534 . Stei ner. A. L. 1968. Behavioral inte ractions between Liris lIigra Van Der Linde r (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) and Gryllus domesticus L. (Onhoptera: G ry llidae). Psyche 75: 256-273. Vander Meer. R.K. and D.P. Wojcik 1982 . Chem ica l m imic ry in the mynnecoph ilous beetle Ml'rll/ ecaphodilis excomlicollis. Science 2 18: 806-808. Wheele r. W.M. 1900. The habit s of M.I'rll/ecophi/a lI ebrascellsis Brunner. Psyche 9: 111 - 11 5. Wil son, E.O. 1971 . The insect societi es. Belknap/Harvard: Cambridge. MA 548 pp. 

English

Morphology of Myrmecophila manni, a myrmecophilous cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

https://journal.entsocbc.ca/index.php/journal/article/download/2233/2297

Morphology of Myrmecophila manni, a myrmecophilous cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia