Fairclough, Isabela

Fairclough, Norman

English

CLoK

Argument, Deliberation, Dialectic and the Nature of the Political: A CDA Perspective

 We are grateful to Alan Finlayson, Colin Hay and Stephen Coleman for their challenging responses to Political Discourse Analysis (PDA) and we hope to give a satisfactory answer to their main arguments. Both Hay and Finlayson argue that, in focusing on argumentation and deliberation, we misunderstand the nature of the political. Second, Finlayson thinks that there is a discontinuity between critical discourse analysis (CDA), in its previous versions, and our present framework. Third, Finlayson claims that CDA's focus on representations should not be displaced by a focus on action, that conflict over representations is fundamental in politics, and a rhetorical (not dialectical) perspective is best suited to analysing political discourse. Fourth, Coleman argues that important features of political discourse cannot be addressed by our approach, which should be supplemented by ‘dramatistic’ methods. </jats:p

Isabela Fairclough

Norman Fairclough

Crossref

Political Studies Review

http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/8940/1/13172_Argument_Deliberation_and_the_Nature_of_the_Political.pdf

Argument, Deliberation, Dialectic and the Nature of the Political: A CDA Perspective

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CLoK

Crossref