CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Ruminant trans-fatty acids and risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Authors
M. Bagheri
M. Kolahdouz Mohammadi
R. Kolahdouz Mohammadi
F. Shidfar
Publication date
1 January 2017
Publisher
'Edizioni Minerva Medica'
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Ruminant trans-fatty acids, especially cis9, trans11-conjugated linoleic acid (c9, t11-CLA) and trans11-18:1 vaccenic acid (t11-18:1 VA) appear to have anticarcinogenic activity against breast cancer in animal and in vitro experiments. However, the results remain inconsistent. We therefore conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis to assess the association of c9, t11-CLA, and t11-18:1 VA (intake or serum levels) with breast cancer risk. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Relevant studies were identified by a search of PubMed, OVID, SCOPUS and Google scholar databases through 25 May 2015. We included case-control and cohort studies that reported relative risk (RR) estimates with 95 confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between c9, t11-CLA and t11-18:1 VA intake or their serum levels and the risk of breast cancer. This meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines for the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Three studies on c9, t11-CLA and t11-18:1 VA serum levels and t11-18:1 VA intake were evaluated in the systematic review only (narrative synthesis) and four studies (2 case-control and 2 cohort studies on c9, t11-CLA intake) were included in the meta-analysis (quantitative synthesis). The pooled RR for the highest vs lowest category of c9, t11-CLA intake was 0.94 (95 CI: 0.64-1.25) with evidence of heterogeneity (with 67, 533 participants, I2=78.3, P=0.003). Studies that could not be included in the quantitative syntheses were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: No association was found between c9, t11-CLA intake and breast cancer risk, but the number of studies identified was small. © 2016 Edizioni Minerva Medica
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
eprints Iran University of Medical Sciences
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:eprints.iums.ac.ir:7626
Last time updated on 10/10/2019