Adherence to pre-set benchmark quality criteria to qualify as expert assessor of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus biopsies – towards digital review of Barrett’s esophagus

Bergman, J.J.G.H.M. (Jacques); Biermann, K. (Katharina); Brosens, L.A. (Lodewijk); Doukas, M. (M.); Duits, L.C. (L. C.); Huysentruyt, C.J. (Clément J.); Karrenbeld, A. (A.); Kats-Ugurlu, G. (Gursah); Klaver, E. (E.); Lijnschoten, G. van; Meijer, S.L. (Sybren); Moll, F.C.P.; Offerhaus, G.J.A. (Johan); Ooms, A.H.A.G. (Ariadne); Pouw, R.E. (R. E.); Seldenrijk, K.A. (Kees); ten Kate, F.J.W. (F. J.W.); Tijssen, J.G.P. (Jan); van der Laan, J.S. (J. S.); van der Wel, M.J. (M. J.); Visser, M. (Marjan)

Adherence to pre-set benchmark quality criteria to qualify as expert assessor of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus biopsies – towards digital review of Barrett’s esophagus

Abstract

Background: Dysplasia assessment of Barrett’s esophagus biopsies is associated with low observer agreement; guidelines advise expert review. We have developed a web-based review panel for dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus biopsies. Objective: The purpose of this study was to test if 10 gastrointestinal pathologists working at Dutch Barrett’s esophagus expert centres met pre-set benchmark scores for quality criteria. Methods: Ten gastrointestinal pathologists twice assessed 60 digitalized Barrett’s esophagus cases, enriched for dysplasia; then

Similar works

Full text

Open in the Core reader

Download PDF

Available Versions

Erasmus University Digital Repository

oai:repub.eur.nl:118682

Last time updated on 04/09/2019