CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Tree survival and growth responses in the aftermath of a strong earthquake
Authors
RB Allen
EA Arnst
+5 more
PJ Bellingham
DA Coomes
JM Hurst
DI MacKenzie
SK Wiser
Publication date
1 January 2020
Publisher
Journal of Ecology
Doi
Cite
Abstract
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society The infrequent and unpredictable nature of earthquakes means that their landslide-generated impacts on forests are rarely investigated. In montane forests, landslides are the main cause of tree death and injury during earthquakes. Landslides range from soil movements that uproot and bury trees over extensive areas to rock falls that strike individual trees. We examined unexplored relationships between tree survival and distance from an epicentre, soil-available phosphorus (P) as an indicator of soil development and tree diameter. We expected decreased tree growth in damaged forests because of tree injury. We used a plot network, established in 1974 and resurveyed regularly ever since, to quantify survival and growth responses 6–30 km from the epicentre of a 1994 earthquake in New Zealand's Southern Alps. Our Bayesian analysis used 8,518 trees from 250 plots that representatively sampled a naturally monospecific Nothofagus forest. As the time-scales over which responses could emerge were unknown, we compared relationships for a pre-earthquake period with 0–5 years post-earthquake, and with 5+ years post-earthquake. Not all plots were affected by the earthquake. We found that 0–5 years post-earthquake survival increased logarithmically with distance from the epicentre with lowered survival up to 20 km from the epicentre. Survival was low on plots with high soil-available P. An inverted U-shaped relationship between survival and diameter pre-earthquake was not found 0–5 years post-earthquake. This was because of surprisingly high survival by large trees. The earthquake most often suppressed 0–5 years post-earthquake growth up to 15 km from the epicentre, but this was only apparent after accounting for more general growth differences among periods. The positive relationship between growth and soil-available P pre-earthquake and 5+ years post-earthquake reflected enhanced growth on young soils. This contrasted with a negative effect of soil-available P on growth 0–5 years post-earthquake. Synthesis. Soil-available P, tree diameter and distance from the epicentre independently determined how tree survival and growth responded to an earthquake. The impacts on survival and growth largely occurred 0–5 years post-earthquake and suggests a level of resilience in mountain beech forests
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Sustaining member
Apollo (Cambridge)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1...
Last time updated on 04/09/2019