Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for extubation failure after cardiac surgery: Pilot safety evaluation.
- Publication date
- Publisher
Abstract
Objective: Extubation failure is a serious complication after cardiac surgery. The role of noninvasive positivepressure
ventilation for acute respiratory failure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is unknown. This study
aimed to assess the safety of implementing noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in this setting and its impact
on lung function and operative outcomes.
Methods: In a 6-month pilot prospective survey, the study population comprised 43 patients (32were male with
a mean age of 65.73 9 years; 3 heart transplantations, 18 coronary artery bypass grafts, 5 aortic dissections, and
17 valvular procedures; 34 active smokers, 25 with medically treated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 21
emergency/urgency procedures) who required noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure
after initial weaning from a respirator. The cause of acute respiratory failure (classified as post-cardiopulmonary
bypass lung injury in 48.8% [21 patients], cardiogenic edema in 30.2% [13 patients], and pneumonia in
21%[9 patients]), length of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation support, respiratory ratios (arterial oxygen
tension/fraction of inspired oxygen assessed immediately before noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, and
every 6 hours after institution of pressure ventilation), and need for reintubation along with a set of predefined
safety parameters were recorded.
Results: The mean length of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation support was 33.8 24.04 hours. Plotting
respiratory ratios with length of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation supports a significant improvement was
already evident within the first 6-hour frame (133.6 39.5 vs 205 65.7; P<.001) for all causes. Noninvasive
positive-pressure ventilation prevented intubation in 74.4% of the patients, with satisfactory recovery for postcardiopulmonary
bypass lung injury and cardiogenic dysfunction (90.5% and 69.2%, respectively) and poor
results (55% reintubated) in those treated for pneumonia. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation safety
approached 97.7%.
Conclusion: In appropriate candidates, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation exerts favorable effects on lung
function, preventing reintubation. The cost-effectiveness of its systematic use in this setting should be assessed