Working document to the ICES Arctic Fisheries Working Group, Copenhagen 20-28 August 199

Bogstad, Bjarte

Gjøsæter, Harald

Mehl, Sigbjørn

English

Brage IMR

 1 Multispecies considerations  Working document to the ICES Arctic Fisheries Working Group, Copenhagen 20-28 August 1997.   by Bjarte Bogstad, Harald Gjøsæter and Sigbjørn Mehl Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway  Cod consumption  The consumption by cod of various prey species is shown in Table 1. The consumption is calculated using the same method as in Bogstad and Mehl (1997), using stomach content data from the joint PINRO-IMR stomach content data base, a model for the gastric evacuation rate of cod and data on sea temperature and the abundance and geographical distribution of cod. The consumption is calculated for three main areas in the Barents Sea and for the first and second half of the year, for age groups 1-11+ separately. On the average 6000 stomachs have been sampled annually since 1984. The consumption estimates in Table 1 do not include consumption by mature cod in the period when it is outside the Barents Sea (assumed to be 3 months during the first half of the year). During this period it may consume significant amounts of adult herring (Bogstad and Mehl, 1997).   The consumption of capelin decreased from approximately 3 million tonnes in 1991-1993 to about 650 thousand tonnes in 1996. This decrease corresponds well to the observed development of the capelin stock. Amphipods and krill combined accounts for about 35% of the diet in 1995-1996, with krill as the most important of those two in 1996. After a drop in 1993-1994, the consumption of redfish is now back at the normal level of 200-300 thousand tonnes. The consumption of cod by cod (cannibalism) has increased strongly since 1992, and  cod now makes up more than 10 % of the diet. The consumption of haddock by cod has varied around 100 thousand tonnes since 1992. The consumption of cod and haddock by prey age group is given in Tables 2 and 3.  The consumption of herring and polar cod decreased strongly from 1994 to 1996, and those two species combined  made up only 3 %  of the diet in 1996. The consumption of shrimp has been  stable around 500 thousand tonnes in the last years.   Table 1. The Northeast Arctic cod stock’s consumption in 1000 tonnes of main prey species in 1984 - 1996.  Prey species Year  Amphip. Krill Shr-imp Capelin Herr-ing Polarcod Cod Had-dock Red-fish Gr. hal. Oth-ers Total 1984 27 112 439 735 77 15 23 51 370 0 511 2359 1985 168 57 154 1617 180 3 33 47 225 0 1153 3637 1986 1216 107 140 828 132 140 82 109 312 + 660 3727 1987 1061 65 187 225 32 199 24 4 313 + 666 2778 1988 1246 313 130 336 8 91 9 3 225 0 411 2772 1989 835 247 132 593 3 33 8 11 233 0 744 2838 1990 143 94 202 1679 7 6 20 17 250 0 1620 4037 1991 81 94 209 3093 8 12 27 21 326 8 1202 5083 1992 117 190 444 2849 348 111 57 114 209 28 1160 5627 1993 314 820 388 3644 196 327 328 87 114 2 958 7177 1994 725 924 654 1391 196 822 276 63 99 + 869 6019 1995 1349 719 484 813 165 335 541 159 272 2 1170 6010 1996 658 1503 525 652 79 85 663 98 200 0 1210 5672 Mean 610 403 314 1420 110 168 161 60 242 3 949 4441 % 14 9 7 32 3 4 4 1 6 0 21 100          Table 2. The Northeast Arctic cod stock’s consumption of cod in 1984-1996, by prey age group.  2   Year Age 0 cons. Age 1 cons.  Age 2 cons. Age 3 cons. Age 4 cons. Age 5 cons. Age 6 cons. 1984 0 440 23 + 0 0 0 1985 1479 380 70 + 0 0 0 1986 53 418 392 99 0 0 0 1987 654 176 274 14 0 0 0 1988 29 422 23 2 0 0 0 1989 967 142 + 0 0 0 0 1990 0 64 29 0 0 0 0 1991 141 156 221 2 0 0 0 1992 4262 1117 162 4 0 0 0 1993 4895 23375 602 61 2 + 0 1994 10347 9355 820 147 57 8 + 1995 11038 19789 1095 357 120 4 + 1996 53 26011 2245 241 94 29 2   Table 3. The Northeast Arctic cod stock’s consumption of haddock in 1984-1996, by prey age group.   Year Age 0 cons. Age 1 cons.  Age 2 cons. Age 3 cons. Age 4 cons. Age 5 cons. Age 6 cons. 1984 1906 1011 16 + 0 0 0 1985 1678 1197 5 0 0 0 0 1986 91 558 242 165 0 0 0 1987 0 759 0 0 0 0 0 1988 0 16 1 9 0 0 0 1989 22 238 0 0 0 0 0 1990 0 149 42 4 0 0 0 1991 52 470 15 0 0 0 0 1992 0 2254 155 1 0 0 0 1993 171 1844 184 40 4 3 0 1994 1082 2009 93 28 9 1 + 1995 1797 3818 236 18 41 42 + 1996 0 1716 290 93 12 6 8   Consumption by minke whales and harp seals  Nilssen et al. (1997) and Folkow et al. (1997) calculated the consumption by harp seals and minke whales in the Barents Sea using data on energy intake, diet composition, energy density of prey and stock size. The food consumption by the 700 000 harp seals (including 100 000 pups) was calculated both for periods with a high and low capelin stock. In the calculations of the consumption by 85 000 minke whales in the Barents Sea and in Norwegian coastal waters , data from 1992-1995 were used, but data from 1992 in areas with much capelin were excluded in order to get an estimate for a period with a low capelin stock. Table 4 compares the consumption by minke whale, harp seal and cod in the Barents Sea for a situation with a low capelin stock and high herring stock. The consumption by harp seals in a situation with a high capelin stock is given in brackets.        Table 4. Annual consumption by minke whale, harp seal and cod in the Barents Sea when the capelin stock is low and the herring stock is high. 1000 tonnes (wet weight)  3  Prey Minke whale consumption  Harp seal consumption (period with high capelin stock in brackets) Cod consumption (1993-1995 average) Capelin 142 7(258) 1949 Herring 633 131(70) 186 Cod 256 93(32) 382 Haddock 128 14(*) 103 Krill 602 215(215) 821 Amphipods 0 115(109) 796 Shrimp 0 *(*) 509 Polar cod * 326(213) 495 Other fish 55 224(142) 1631 Other crustaceans 0 127(104) 9992 Total 1816 1253(1143) 6402      * indicates that the prey species is included in the ‘other’ groups for this predator  1 redfish and Greenland halibut only  2 including fish other than redfish, Greenland halibut and the fish species mentioned in the table.   Haug et al. (1997) studied variations in the diet of minke whales, and found that in the ES (Svalbard) area (west of 30° E and north of 73°N), minke whales switched from a capelin-dominated diet to a diet almost completely comprised of krill Thysanoessa sp. In the EB area (the rest of the Barents Sea including the coastal areas of Finnmark and Kola), the diet was dominated by herring in 1992-1994. Herring was replaced by krill and capelin in the diet in 1995-1996, when the abundance of herring was greatly reduced.    Prognosis for development of the capelin stock  The Barents Sea capelin stock is at present at a low level, but is probably going to recover within a relatively short time. Consequently, it is nearly impossible to give any prognosis for its development. The recovery could take two years (as it did in 1988-90) or it could take five, depending on the conditions. The two main factors regulating the process of recovery are the presence of young herring in the Barents Sea (which will hamper the recruitment) and the amount of zooplankton (which will regulate the growth of the capelin cohorts already in the stock). The stock will in 1998 consist of the year classes 1997, 1996, 1995, and 1994.  The 1994 year class  This year class was estimated in autumn 1996 at 11.5 billion individuals and 215 000 tonnes, out of which almost 200 000 tonnes probably spawned in winter 1997. This unusually high proportion of spawners among the 2 (3 at time of spawning) years old fish was caused by the highest growth rate on record. Consequently, only some 2 billion individuals will probably survive the spawning season, and the majority of those surviving until winter 1997-98 will spawn and die in winter 1998. Not much will be left till spring-summer 1998.  The 1995 year class  This year class was estimated in autumn 1996 at 82 billion individuals which is considerably stronger than the preceding year class, but still a weak one in a longer perspective. With the same mortality as the 1994 year class at the same age, it will be reduced to 54 billion by August 1997, which is a little less than 5 times the strength of the 1994 year class at corresponding age. With the same growth as the proceeding year class (which may seem too optimistic) its biomass in autumn 1997 will be about 900 000 tonnes, out of which about 800 000 tonnes will be maturing and will spawn in winter 1998. Less than 100 000 tonnes (when reduced by natural mortality) will survive till spring-summer 1998.  The 1996 year class  4  This year class has yet to be estimated by acoustic methods. At the international 0-group survey in August 1996 an index of 291 was calculated, high compared to the three preceding year classes at the same stage, but still a weak year class in a longer perspective. Gundersen & Gjøsæter (in press) established a linear regression between the 0-group indices and the number of 1-group one year later. According to this regression, the prognosis for its abundance in autumn 1997 is about 150 billions or about twice that of the 1995 year class at the same stage. Following the logic discussed above, (which may be even more optimistic for this year class) it will constitute about 1.7 million tonnes in autumn 1998, out of which 1.5 million tonnes will mature and spawn in winter 1999.  The 1997 year class  Not much is known about this year class yet. Its larval abundance in June 1997 was estimated at 6.9 thousand billion individuals, which is probably an underestimate since the surveying vessel was not granted permission to work in Russian EEZ. This means that the 1997 year class may be of  “normal” strength at the larval stage. Its fate is, however, totally determined by the predation from herring in the period June-September 1997. During the same survey as that where the capelin larval abundance was estimated, low numbers of young herring was found. However, herring of the 1996 year class, which, on the basis of the 0-group survey in autumn 1996 was thought to be numerous, may stay in the Russian EEZ, which was not surveyed. It is therefore impossible to give any prognosis for the 1997 year class of capelin at the present stage. A first estimate of its size will be obtained during the 0-group survey in August.  Conclusions  The first signs of a recovery of the Barents Sea capelin stock is evident. The year classes 1995 and 1996 are seemingly stronger than the preceding ones, and the 1997 year class may be of a “pre-collapse” strength. If the predation rate on the larvae continues to be  low, and if the growth rate of all age groups continues to be high, the stock may recover within 1-2 years from now. If either the growth slows down or the natural mortality increases, it may take longer. The stock biomass and M-output biomass for the period 1984-1996 is shown in Table 5, together with predictions for 1997 and 1998.   Table 5. Capelin stock biomass and M-output biomass 1984-1998. All quantities in thousand tonnes.  Year Total stock biomass (Oct. 1) M output biomass during year 1984 2964 3197 1985 860 1987 1986 120 657 1987 101 200 1988 428 80 1989 864 549 1990 5831 357 1991 7287 3326 1992 5150 7751 1993 796 4590 1994 199 981 1995 193 163 1996 503 261 1997 * 1300 600 1998 ** 2000 1000    * Estimate, includes the 1996 year class which size is estimated from a regression on an 0-group index ** Guestimate, includes the 1997 year class which size is unknown, in addition to the 1996 year class  Relationship between cod growth and capelin abundance  References   5 Bogstad, B.  and Mehl, S. 1997. Interactions between Cod and Its Prey Species in the Barents Sea. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Role of Forage Fish in Marine Ecosystems, Anchorage, Alaska, 13-16 November 1996. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, AK-SG-97-01. (in press).   Folkow, L-P., Haug, T., Nilssen, K.T. and Nordøy, E.S. 1997. Estimated Food Consumption of Minke Whales Balaenoptera acutorostrata in Northeast Atlantic Waters in 1992-1995.  ICES C.M. 1997/GG:01, 26 pp.  Haug, T., Lindstrøm, U. and Nilssen, K.T. 1997. Variations in northeast Atlantic minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata diets in response to environmental changes. ICES C.M. 1997/BB:20, 15 pp.  Nilssen, K.T., Pedersen, O-P., Folkow, L.P. and Haug, T. 1997. Food consumption estimates of Barents Sea harp seals. NAMMCO Scientific Committee Working Group on the Role of Minke Whales, Harp seals and hooded seals in North Atlantic ecosystems, Tromsø, Norway 10-13 March 1997. SC/5/ME/27, 21 pp.      

Multispecies considerations

NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives

HSN Open Archive

https://imr.brage.unit.no/imr-xmlui/bitstream/11250/100679/4/WD-Multcons.pdf

Multispecies considerations

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Brage IMR

NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives

HSN Open Archive