CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
research
Regulation of South China Sea throughflow by pressure difference
Authors
Rui Xin Huang
Huiling Qin
Weiqiang Wang
Huijie Xue
Publication date
12 June 2016
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2016. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 121 (2016): 4077–4096, doi:10.1002/2015JC011177.Sea Surface Height (SSH) data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts-Ocean Reanalysis System 4 (ECMWF-ORAS4) are used to determine the pressure difference in connection with variability of the South China Sea ThroughFlow (SCSTF) from 1958 to 2007. Two branches of SCSTF, the Karimata-Sunda Strait ThroughFlow (KSSTF) and the Mindoro Strait ThroughFlow (MSTF), are examined. Using the ensemble empirical mode decomposition method (EEMD), time series of pressure difference and volume transport are decomposed into intrinsic mode functions and trend functions, with the corresponding variability on different time scales. Pressure difference agrees with the KSSTF volume transport on decadal time scale; while for the MSTF, pressure difference varies similarly with volume transport on interannual time scale. Separating the dynamic height difference into the thermal and haline terms, for the KSSTF more than half of the dynamic height difference (32 cm) is due to the thermal contributions; while the remaining dynamic height difference (23 cm) is due to the haline contributions. For the MSTF, the dynamic height difference (29 cm) is primarily due to the thermal contribution (26 cm).This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant XDA11010304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 41306015 and 41476013) and the Independent Research Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography (grant LTOZZ1603).2016-12-1
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Woods Hole Open Access Server
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:darchive.mblwhoilibrary.or...
Last time updated on 07/08/2019