CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
The Validity of the 16-Item Version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to Screen for Ultra High Risk of Developing Psychosis in the General Help-Seeking Population
Authors
S. Dragt
M. van der Gaag
+9 more
H.K. Ising
R.M. Klaassen
D.H. Linszen
R.L. Loewy
D.H. Nieman
J. Rietdijk
M.W. Rietveld
W. Veling
L. Wunderink
Publication date
1 January 2012
Publisher
Doi
View
on
PubMed
Abstract
In order to bring about implementation of routine screening for psychosis risk, a brief version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ; Loewy et al., 2005) was developed and tested in a general help-seeking population. We assessed a consecutive patient sample of 3533 young adults who were help-seeking for nonpsychotic disorders at the secondary mental health services in the Hague with the PQ. We performed logistic regression analyses and CHi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector decision tree analysis to shorten the original 92 items. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to examine the psychometric properties of the PQ-16. In the general help-seeking population, a cutoff score of 6 or more positively answered items on the 16-item version of the PQ produced correct classification of Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental State (Yung et al., 2005) psychosis risk/clinical psychosis in 44% of the cases, distinguishing Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) diagnosis from no CAARMS diagnosis with high sensitivity (87%) and specificity (87%). These results were comparable to the PQ-92. The PQ-16 is a good self-report screen for use in secondary mental health care services to select subjects for interviewing for psychosis risk. The low number of items makes it quite appropriate for screening large help-seeking populations, thus enhancing the feasibility of detection and treatment of ultra high-risk patients in routine mental health services. © The Author 2012
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
DSpace at VU
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:dare.ubvu.vu.nl:1871/38057
Last time updated on 03/09/2013
NARCIS
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 14/10/2017
VU Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research.vu.nl:publication...
Last time updated on 18/04/2020
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1093%2Fschbul%2Fsb...
Last time updated on 01/04/2019
NARCIS
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 14/10/2017
Maastricht University Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:cris.maastrichtuniversity....
Last time updated on 03/01/2026
Maastricht University Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:cris.maastrichtuniversity....
Last time updated on 13/05/2023
Maastricht University Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:cris.maastrichtuniversity....
Last time updated on 17/10/2019