CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Meta-analysis: Acupuncture for osteoarthritis of the knee
Authors
B.M. Berman
L.M. Bouter
+3 more
L.X. Lao
K. van der Linde
E. Manheimer
Publication date
1 January 2007
Publisher
Doi
Abstract
Background: Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of pain and functional limitation. Purpose: To evaluate the effects of acupuncture for treating knee osteoarthritis. Data Sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases to January 2007. No language restrictions were applied. Study Selection: Randomized trials longer than 6 weeks in duration that compared needle acupuncture with a sham, usual care, or waiting list control group for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Data Extraction: Two authors independently agreed on eligibility, assessed methodological quality and acupuncture adequacy, and extracted outcome data on pain and function measures. Data Synthesis: Eleven trials met the selection criteria, and 9 reported sufficient data for pooling. Standardized mean differences were calculated by using differences in improvements from baseline between patients assigned to acupuncture and those assigned to control groups. Compared with patients in waiting list control groups, patients who received acupuncture reported clinically relevant short-term improvements in pain (standardized mean difference, -0.96 [95% CI, -1.21 to -0.70]) and function (standardized mean difference, -0.93 [CI, -1.16 to -0.69]). Patients who received acupuncture also reported clinically relevant short- and long-term improvements in pain and function compared with patients in usual care control groups. Compared with a sham control, acupuncture provided clinically irrelevant short-term improvements in pain (standardized mean difference, -0.35 [CI, -0.55 to -0.15]) and function (standardized mean difference, -0.35 [CI, -0.56 to -0.14]) and clinically irrelevant long-term improvements in pain (standardized mean difference, -0.13 [CI, -0.24 to -0.01]) and function (standardized mean difference, -0.14 [CI, -0.26 to -0.03]). Limitation: Sham-controlled trials had heterogeneous results that were probably due to the variability of acupuncture and sham protocols, patient samples, and settings. Conclusions: Sham-controlled trials show clinically irrelevant short-term benefits of acupuncture for treating knee osteoarthritis. Waiting list-controlled trials suggest clinically relevant benefits, some of which may be due to placebo or expectation effects. © 2007 American College of Physicians.link_to_subscribed_fulltex
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
VU Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research.vu.nl:publication...
Last time updated on 04/03/2021
HKU Scholars Hub
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:hub.hku.hk:10722/188587
Last time updated on 01/06/2016
DSpace at VU
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:dare.ubvu.vu.nl:1871/22555
Last time updated on 03/09/2013
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.7326%2F0003-4819-1...
Last time updated on 05/06/2019
NARCIS
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 30/03/2019