CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
research
The role of self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity versus neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision making in the prediction of relapse in pathological gamblers
Authors
A. E. Goudriaan
E. De Beurs
+9 more
Goudriaan
Groth-Marnat
Hammes
Hesselbrock
J. Oosterlaan
Logan
Monti
Robins
W. Van Den Brink
Publication date
1 January 2008
Publisher
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Background: Disinhibition and decision-making skills play an important role in theories on the cause and outcome of addictive behaviors such as substance use disorders and pathological gambling. In recent studies, both disinhibition and disadvantageous decision-making strategies, as measured by neurocognitive tests, have been found to influence the course of substance use disorders. Research on factors affecting relapse in pathological gambling is scarce. Method: This study investigated the effect of both self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity, and neurocognitively assessed disinhibition and decision-making under conflicting contingencies, on relapse in a group of 46 pathological gamblers. Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated that longer duration of the disorder and neurocognitive indicators of disinhibition (Stop Signal Reaction Time) and decision-making (Card Playing Task) were significant predictors of relapse (explaining 53% of the variance in relapse), whereas self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity did not significantly predict relapse. Overall classification accuracy was 76%, with a positive classification accuracy of 76% and a negative classification accuracy of 75%. Conclusions: Duration of the disorder and neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision-making are powerful predictors of relapse in pathological gambling. The results suggest that endophenotypical neurocognitive characteristics are more promising in the prediction of relapse in pathological gambling than phenotypical personality characteristics. Neurocognitive predictors may be useful to guide treatment planning of follow-up contacts and booster sessions. © 2007 Cambridge University Press
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
NARCIS
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 14/10/2017
NARCIS
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 16/12/2017
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 03/01/2020
DSpace at VU
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:dare.ubvu.vu.nl:1871/17844
Last time updated on 03/09/2013
VU Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:research.vu.nl:publication...
Last time updated on 18/04/2020