Mammography is the current standard imaging method for detecting breast cancer by using x-rays to produce 2D images of the breast. However, with mammography alone there is difficulty determining whether a lesion is benign or malignant and reduced sensitivity to detecting lesions in dense breasts. Ultrasound imaging used in conjunction with mammography has shown valuable contributions for lesion characterization by differentiating between solid and cystic lesions. Conventional breast ultrasound has high false positive rates; however, it has shown improved abilities to detect lesions in dense breasts. Breast ultrasound is typically performed freehand to produce anterior-to-posterior 2D images in a different geometry (supine) than mammography (upright). This difference in geometries is likely responsible for the finding that at least 10% of the time lesions found in the ultrasound images do not correspond with lesions found in mammograms. To solve this problem additional imaging techniques must be investigated to aid a radiologist in identifying corresponding lesions in the two modalities to ensure early detection of a potential cancer.
This dissertation describes and validates automated deformable mapping methods to register and relate corresponding lesions between multi-modality images acquired using 3D mammography (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and dedicated breast Computed Tomography (bCT)) and 3D ultrasound (Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS)). The methodology involves the use of finite element modeling and analysis to simulate the differences in compression and breast orientation to better align lesions acquired from images from these modalities. Preliminary studies were performed using several multimodality compressible breast phantoms to determine breast lesion registrations between: i) cranio-caudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) DBT views and ABUS, ii) simulated bCT and DBT (CC and MLO views), and iii) simulated bCT and ABUS. Distances between the centers of masses, dCOM, of corresponding lesions were used to assess the deformable mapping method.
These phantom studies showed the potential to apply this technique for real breast lesions with mean dCOM registration values as low as 4.9 ± 2.4 mm for DBT (CC view) mapped to ABUS, 9.3 ± 2.8 mm for DBT (MLO view) mapped to ABUS, 4.8 ± 2.4 mm for bCT mapped to ABUS, 5.0 ± 2.2 mm for bCT mapped to DBT (CC view), and 4.7 ± 2.5 mm for bCT mapped to DBT (MLO view). All of the phantom studies showed that using external fiducial markers helped improve the registration capability of the deformable mapping algorithm. An IRB-approved proof-of-concept study was performed with patient volunteers to validate the deformable registration method on 5 patient datasets with a total of up to 7 lesions for DBT (CC and MLO views) to ABUS registration. Resulting dCOM’s using the deformable method showed statistically significant improvements over rigid registration techniques with a mean dCOM of 11.6 ± 5.3 mm for DBT (CC view) mapped to ABUS and a mean dCOM of 12.3 ± 4.8 mm for DBT (MLO view) mapped to ABUS.
The present work demonstrates the potential for using deformable registration techniques to relate corresponding lesions in 3D x-ray and 3D ultrasound images. This methodology should improve a radiologists’ characterization of breast lesions which can reduce patient callbacks, misdiagnoses, additional patient dose and unnecessary biopsies. Additionally, this technique can save a radiologist time in navigating 3D image volumes and the one-to-one lesion correspondence between modalities can aid in the early detection of breast malignancies.PHDNuclear Engineering & Radiological SciencesUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150042/1/canngree_1.pd
