CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Evaluation of a direct PCR method and the Qiagen Investigator 24plex GO! Kit for typing blood, saliva and touch DNA on multiple substrates
Authors
Angelita Pierre-Noel
Publication date
1 December 2017
Publisher
CUNY Academic Works
Abstract
In forensic DNA typing, omitting the DNA extraction procedure and adding the sample directly to the polymerase chain reaction (direct PCR) mixture has several advantages. Without extraction and purification, there is less of a risk of sample loss, sample mix up, or contamination. This study tested the feasibility of direct PCR using the Qiagen® Investigator® 24plex GO! Kit, a megaplex kit that amplifies 22 polymorphic STR markers and the Amelogenin sex determination alleles. Test samples included blood, saliva and skin cells on porous substrates, specifically denim, white cotton, polyester fabric, and paper tissue. Glass slides were used to represent non-porous surfaces. Body fluids like blood and saliva were collected using the following: Scotch™ double-sided tape, Zots™ dots, Sellotape® and two different FLOQSwabs™ from Copan© (microFLOQ® and a nylon FLOQSwab™). The results show that utilization of Sellotape® as a sample collection method was the most successful in generating a profile. This collection yields fast PCR-STR results and is non-destructive, so that the remaining sample can be re-tested if necessary. For touch samples, collection employed a double swab technique using the nylon FLOQSwab™ from Copan, a single Fitzco CEP swab, as well as a cutting method for the fabric substrates. The use of swabs had better success than cutting, probably due to the swab covering a larger surface area, thereby collecting a larger quantity of sample. Touch samples on glass were problematic. This sample type showed some PCR inhibition for samples collected with the FLOQSwab™ and had the lowest overall success rate
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
City University of New York
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:jj_...
Last time updated on 09/07/2019